Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
ALL libraries (COBIB.SI union bibliographic/catalogue database)
  • Fallacies : do we "use" them or "commit" them? Or: is all our life just a collection of fallacies?
    Žagar, Igor Ž., 1960-
    After C. L. Hamblin's groundbreaking work Fallacies (1970), re-interpreting what used to be known as "mistakes in reasoning" or "bad arguments" since Aristotle (On Sophistical Refutations), the study ... of fallacies started to bloom, coming up with ever new perspectives and conceptualizations of what should count as a mistake in reasoning and argumentation, and why a certain kind of reasoning should at all be considered a mistake (Woods & Walton 1989, van Eemeren & Grootendorst 1992, etc.). This paper will be concerned with two questions. First, an epistemological one: do we (unintentionally) commit fallacies, or do we (intentionally) use them? Secondly, a methodological one: when we (philosophers, sociologists, discourse analysts, ...) detect a fallacy, on what conceptual grounds do we differentiate between committed and used fallacies? Aren't we forced to commit (or use?) "fallacies" whenever we talk about other people, their views, or their work? Examples from Critical Discourse Analysis will be used to extensively illustrate this point.
    Type of material - conference contribution ; adult, serious
    Publish date - 2011
    Language - english
    COBISS.SI-ID - 2411095