BACKGROUND Opioid agonist treatment is considered important in preventing acquisition of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people who inject drugs; however, the role of dosage in opioid agonist treatment ...is unclear. We investigated the joint association of prescribed dosage of opioid agonist treatment and patient-perceived dosage adequacy with risk of HCV infection among people who inject drugs. METHODS We followed prospectively people who inject drugs at risk of acquiring HCV infection (who were RNA negative and HCV-antibody negative or positive) in Montréal, Canada (2004–2017). At 6-month, then 3-month intervals, participants were tested for HCV antibodies or RNA, and completed an interviewer-administered behavioural questionnaire, reporting the following: current exposure to opioid agonist treatment (yes/no), prescribed dosage either high (methadone ≥ 60 mg/d or buprenorphine ≥ 16 mg/d) or low, and perceived dosage adequacy (adequate/inadequate). We then assigned participants to 1 of 5 exposure categories: no opioid agonist treatment, high dosage of opioid agonist treatment perceived to be adequate, high dosage perceived to be inadequate, low dosage perceived to be adequate or low dosage perceived to be inadequate. To estimate associations between categories of opioid agonist treatment dosage and incident HCV infection, we conducted Cox regression analyses, adjusting for multiple confounding factors. RESULTS Of 513 participants (median age 35.0 yr, 77.6% male), 168 acquired HCV over 1422.6 person-years of follow-up (incidence 11.8/100 person-years, 95% confidence interval CI 10.1–13.7). We observed a gradient in the relative risks of HCV infection across categories of opioid agonist treatment dosage. Compared with people who inject drugs not receiving opioid agonist treatment, adjusted hazard ratios were 0.43 (95% CI 0.23–0.84) for those receiving high dosages perceived to be adequate, 0.61 (95% CI 0.25–1.50) for those receiving high dosages perceived to be inadequate, 1.22 (95% CI 0.74–2.00) for those receiving low dosages perceived to be adequate and 1.94 (95% CI 1.11–3.39) for those receiving low dosages perceived to be inadequate. INTERPRETATION Risk of HCV infection varies considerably according to dosage of opioid agonist treatment and patient-perceived adequacy, with associations indicating both protective and harmful effects relative to no exposure to opioid agonist treatment.
Opioid use disorder is often a chronic, relapsing condition associated with increased morbidity and death; however, with appropriate treatment and follow-up, individuals can reach sustained long-term ...remission. This guideline strongly recommends opioid agonist treatment with buprenorphine-naloxone as the preferred first-line treatment when possible, because of buprenorphine's multiple advantages, which include a superior safety profile in terms of overdose risk. Withdrawal management alone is not recommended, because this approach has been associated with elevated risks (e.g., syringe sharing) and death from overdose in comparison to providing no treatment, and high rates of relapse when implemented without immediate transition to long-term evidence-based treatment. Here, Bruneau et al discuss management of opioid use disorders.
Background In Canada, interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens are costly. This presents challenges for universal drug coverage of the estimated 220 000 people with ...chronic HCV infection nationwide. The study objective was to appraise criteria for reimbursement of 4 HCV direct-acting antivirals in Canada. Methods We reviewed the reimbursement criteria for simeprevir, sofosbuvir, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and paritaprevir-ritonavir-ombitasvir plus dasabuvir in the 10 provinces and 3 territories. Data were extracted from April 2015 to June 2016. The primary outcomes extracted from health ministerial websites were: 1) minimum fibrosis stage required, 2) drug and alcohol use restrictions, 3) HIV coinfection restrictions and 4) prescriber type restrictions. Results Overall, 85%-92% of provinces/territories limited access to patients with moderate fibrosis (Meta-Analysis of Histologic Data in Viral Hepatitis stage F2 or greater, or equivalent). There were no drug and alcohol use restrictions; however, several criteria (e.g., active injection drug use) were left to the discretion of the physician. Quebec did not reimburse simeprevir and sofosbuvir for people coinfected with HIV; no restrictions were found in the remaining jurisdictions. Prescriber type was restricted to specialists in up to 42% of provinces/territories. Interpretation This review of criteria of reimbursement of HCV direct-acting antivirals in Canada showed substantial interjurisdictional heterogeneity. The findings could inform health policy and support the development and adoption of a national HCV strategy.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
PDF
