While a number of algorithms for multiobjective reinforcement learning have been proposed, and a small number of applications developed, there has been very little rigorous empirical evaluation of ...the performance and limitations of these algorithms. This paper proposes standard methods for such empirical evaluation, to act as a foundation for future comparative studies. Two classes of multiobjective reinforcement learning algorithms are identified, and appropriate evaluation metrics and methodologies are proposed for each class. A suite of benchmark problems with known Pareto fronts is described, and future extensions and implementations of this benchmark suite are discussed. The utility of the proposed evaluation methods are demonstrated via an empirical comparison of two example learning algorithms.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Deep Reinforcement Learning (DeepRL) methods have been widely used in robotics to learn about the environment and acquire behaviours autonomously. Deep Interactive Reinforcement 2 Learning (DeepIRL) ...includes interactive feedback from an external trainer or expert giving advice to help learners choose actions to speed up the learning process. However, current research has been limited to interactions that offer actionable advice to only the current state of the agent. Additionally, the information is discarded by the agent after a single use, which causes a duplicate process at the same state for a revisit. In this paper, we present Broad-Persistent Advising (BPA), an approach that retains and reuses the processed information. It not only helps trainers give more general advice relevant to similar states instead of only the current state, but also allows the agent to speed up the learning process. We tested the proposed approach in two continuous robotic scenarios, namely a cart pole balancing task and a simulated robot navigation task. The results demonstrated that the agent's learning speed increased, as evidenced by the rising reward points of up to 37%, while maintaining the number of interactions required for the trainer, in comparison to the DeepIRL approach.
Full text
Available for:
IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
Real-world sequential decision-making tasks are generally complex, requiring trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Despite this, the majority of research in reinforcement ...learning and decision-theoretic planning either assumes only a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be adequately handled via a simple linear combination. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying problem and hence produce suboptimal results. This paper serves as a guide to the application of multi-objective methods to difficult problems, and is aimed at researchers who are already familiar with single-objective reinforcement learning and planning methods who wish to adopt a multi-objective perspective on their research, as well as practitioners who encounter multi-objective decision problems in practice. It identifies the factors that may influence the nature of the desired solution, and illustrates by example how these influence the design of multi-objective decision-making systems for complex problems.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Robots are extending their presence in domestic environments every day, it being more common to see them carrying out tasks in home scenarios. In the future, robots are expected to increasingly ...perform more complex tasks and, therefore, be able to acquire experience from different sources as quickly as possible. A plausible approach to address this issue is interactive feedback, where a trainer advises a learner on which actions should be taken from specific states to speed up the learning process. Moreover, deep reinforcement learning has been recently widely used in robotics to learn the environment and acquire new skills autonomously. However, an open issue when using deep reinforcement learning is the excessive time needed to learn a task from raw input images. In this work, we propose a deep reinforcement learning approach with interactive feedback to learn a domestic task in a Human–Robot scenario. We compare three different learning methods using a simulated robotic arm for the task of organizing different objects; the proposed methods are (i) deep reinforcement learning (DeepRL); (ii) interactive deep reinforcement learning using a previously trained artificial agent as an advisor (agent–IDeepRL); and (iii) interactive deep reinforcement learning using a human advisor (human–IDeepRL). We demonstrate that interactive approaches provide advantages for the learning process. The obtained results show that a learner agent, using either agent–IDeepRL or human–IDeepRL, completes the given task earlier and has fewer mistakes compared to the autonomous DeepRL approach.
This paper describes a language wrapper for the NetHack Learning Environment (NLE) 1. The wrapper replaces the non-language observations and actions with comparable language versions. The NLE offers ...a grand challenge for AI research while MiniHack 2 extends this potential to more specific and configurable tasks. By providing a language interface, we can enable further research on language agents and directly connect language models to a versatile environment. Keywords: Autonomous Agents, Generalization, Language Models, Language Representations, NetHack, Reinforcement Learning, Transfer Learning
Interactive reinforcement learning methods utilise an external information source to evaluate decisions and accelerate learning. Previous work has shown that human advice could significantly improve ...learning agents' performance. When evaluating reinforcement learning algorithms, it is common to repeat experiments as parameters are altered or to gain a sufficient sample size. In this regard, to require human interaction every time an experiment is restarted is undesirable, particularly when the expense in doing so can be considerable. Additionally, reusing the same people for the experiment introduces bias, as they will learn the behaviour of the agent and the dynamics of the environment. This paper presents a methodology for evaluating interactive reinforcement learning agents by employing simulated users. Simulated users allow human knowledge, bias, and interaction to be simulated. The use of simulated users allows the development and testing of reinforcement learning agents, and can provide indicative results of agent performance under defined human constraints. While simulated users are no replacement for actual humans, they do offer an affordable and fast alternative for evaluative assisted agents. We introduce a method for performing a preliminary evaluation utilising simulated users to show how performance changes depending on the type of user assisting the agent. Moreover, we describe how human interaction may be simulated, and present an experiment illustrating the applicability of simulating users in evaluating agent performance when assisted by different types of trainers. Experimental results show that the use of this methodology allows for greater insight into the performance of interactive reinforcement learning agents when advised by different users. The use of simulated users with varying characteristics allows for evaluation of the impact of those characteristics on the behaviour of the learning agent.
Multiobjective reinforcement learning (MORL) extends RL to problems with multiple conflicting objectives. This paper argues for designing MORL systems to produce a set of solutions approximating the ...Pareto front, and shows that the common MORL technique of scalarisation has fundamental limitations when used to find Pareto-optimal policies. The work is supported by the presentation of three new MORL benchmarks with known Pareto fronts.
Reinforcement learning refers to a machine learning paradigm in which an agent interacts with the environment to learn how to perform a task. The characteristics of the environment may change over ...time or be affected by disturbances not controlled, avoiding the agent finding a proper policy. Some approaches attempt to address these problems, as interactive reinforcement learning, where an external entity helps the agent learn through advice. Other approaches, such as robust reinforcement learning, allow the agent to learn the task, acting in a disturbed environment. In this paper, we propose an approach that addresses interactive reinforcement learning problems in a dynamic environment, where advice provides information on the task and the dynamics of the environment. Thus, an agent learns a policy in a disturbed environment while receiving advice. We implement our approach in the dynamic version of the cart-pole balancing task and a simulated robotic arm dynamic environment to organize objects. Our results show that the proposed approach allows an agent to complete the task satisfactorily in a dynamic, continuous state-action domain. Moreover, experimental results suggest agents trained with our approach are less sensitive to changes in the characteristics of the environment than interactive reinforcement learning agents.
Sequential decision-making problems with multiple objectives arise naturally in practice and pose unique challenges for research in decision-theoretic planning and learning, which has largely focused ...on single-objective settings. This article surveys algorithms designed for sequential decision-making problems with multiple objectives. Though there is a growing body of literature on this subject, little of it makes explicit under what circumstances special methods are needed to solve multi-objective problems. Therefore, we identify three distinct scenarios in which converting such a problem to a single-objective one is impossible, infeasible, or undesirable. Furthermore, we propose a taxonomy that classifies multi-objective methods according to the applicable scenario, the nature of the scalarization function (which projects multi-objective values to scalar ones), and the type of policies considered. We show how these factors determine the nature of an optimal solution, which can be a single policy, a convex hull, or a Pareto front. Using this taxonomy, we survey the literature on multi-objective methods for planning and learning. Finally, we discuss key applications of such methods and outline opportunities for future work.
Broad-XAI
moves away from interpreting individual decisions based on a single datum and aims to provide integrated explanations from multiple machine learning algorithms into a coherent explanation ...of an agent’s behaviour that is aligned to the communication needs of the explainee. Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods, we propose, provide a potential backbone for the cognitive model required for the development of Broad-XAI. RL represents a suite of approaches that have had increasing success in solving a range of sequential decision-making problems. However, these algorithms operate as black-box problem solvers, where they obfuscate their decision-making policy through a complex array of values and functions. EXplainable RL (XRL) aims to develop techniques to extract concepts from the agent’s: perception of the environment; intrinsic/extrinsic motivations/beliefs; Q-values, goals and objectives. This paper aims to introduce the Causal XRL Framework (CXF), that unifies the current XRL research and uses RL as a backbone to the development of Broad-XAI. CXF is designed to incorporate many standard RL extensions and integrated with external ontologies and communication facilities so that the agent can answer questions that explain outcomes its decisions. This paper aims to: establish XRL as a distinct branch of XAI; introduce a conceptual framework for XRL; review existing approaches explaining agent behaviour; and identify opportunities for future research. Finally, this paper discusses how additional information can be extracted and ultimately integrated into models of communication, facilitating the development of Broad-XAI.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
PDF
