Background Whether the use of sevelamer rather than a calcium-containing phosphate binder improves cardiovascular (CV) survival in patients receiving dialysis remains to be elucidated. Study Design ...Open-label randomized controlled trial with parallel groups. Settings & Participants 466 incident hemodialysis patients recruited from 18 centers in Italy. Intervention Study participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to receive either sevelamer or a calcium-containing phosphate binder (although not required by the protocol, all patients in this group received calcium carbonate) for 24 months. Outcomes All individuals were followed up until completion of 36 months of follow-up or censoring. CV death due to cardiac arrhythmias was regarded as the primary end point. Measurements Blind event adjudication. Results At baseline, patients allocated to sevelamer had higher serum phosphorus (mean, 5.6 ± 1.7 SD vs 4.8 ± 1.4 mg/dL) and C-reactive protein levels (mean, 8.8 ± 13.4 vs 5.9 ± 6.8 mg/dL) and lower coronary artery calcification scores (median, 19 IQR, 0-30 vs 30 IQR, 7-180). At study completion, serum phosphate levels were lower in the sevelamer arm (median dosages, 4,800 and 2,000 mg/d for sevelamer and calcium carbonate, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 28 ± 10 months, 128 deaths were recorded (29 and 88 due to cardiac arrhythmias and all-cause CV death). Sevelamer-treated patients experienced lower CV mortality due to cardiac arrhythmias compared with patients treated with calcium carbonate (HR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25; P < 0.001). Similar results were noted for all-cause CV mortality and all-cause mortality, but not for non-CV mortality. Adjustments for potential confounders did not affect results. Limitations Open-label design, higher baseline coronary artery calcification burden in calcium carbonate–treated patients, different mineral metabolism control in sevelamer-treated patients, overall lower than expected mortality. Conclusions These results show that sevelamer compared to a calcium-containing phosphate binder improves survival in a cohort of incident hemodialysis patients. However, the better outcomes in the sevelamer group may be due to better phosphate control rather than reduction in calcium load.
Uremia represents a state where hyperhomocysteinemia is resistant to folate therapy, thus undermining intervention trials' efficacy. N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an antioxidant, in addition to folates ...(5-methyltetrahydrofolate, MTHF), was tested in a population of hemodialysis patients.
The study is an open, parallel, intervention study.
Ambulatory chronic hemodialysis patients.
Clinically stable chronic hemodialysis patients, on hemodialysis since more than 3 months, undergoing a folate washout. Control group on standard therapy (n = 50).
One group was treated with intravenous MTHF (MTHF group, n = 48). A second group was represented by patients treated with MTHF, and, during the course of 10 hemodialysis sessions, NAC was administered intravenous (MTHF + NAC group, n = 47).
Plasma homocysteine measured before and after dialysis at the first and the last treatment.
At the end of the study, there was a significant decrease in predialysis plasma homocysteine levels in the MTHF group and MTHF + NAC group, compared with the control group, but no significant difference between the MTHF group and MTHF + NAC group. A significant decrease in postdialysis plasma homocysteine levels in MTHF + NAC group (10.27 ± 0.94 μmol/L, 95% confidence interval: 8.37-12.17) compared with the MTHF group (16.23 ± 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 14.55-17.90) was present. In the MTHF + NAC group, 64% of patients reached a postdialysis homocysteine level <12 μmol/L, compared with 19% in the MTHF group and 16% in the control group.
NAC therapy induces a significant additional decrease in homocysteine removal during dialysis. The advantage is limited to the time of administration.
The prevention of malnutrition in patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a challenge to nephrologists. We evaluated nutritional practice and routines, at a national level, ...related to the nutritional management of nondialyzed CKD patients.
A questionnaire-based survey (32 open and 9 multiple-choice questions) was used to assess the evaluation of nutritional status in nondialyzed CKD outpatients at baseline and during follow-up. Data were obtained for 230 Italian public nephrology centers (63% of the total number of Italian public nephrology centers).
There was a dedicated dietitian at only 19% of the centers. At baseline, body weight, body mass index, and serum albumin were determined in almost all centers, nutrient intakes and bioimpedance analysis in half the centers, and subjective global assessment and skinfold thickness in a small proportion of centers. During follow-up, the rate of assessments decreased by 8% for weight, 14% for nutrient intake, and 29% for subjective global assessment and skinfold thickness. Overall, the K/DOQI minimum criteria for nutritional assessment were fulfilled in only two thirds and half of the clinics at baseline and during follow-up, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the number of nutritional variables evaluated was significantly related to the size of the CKD clinic and the presence of a dietitian at baseline, but only with the presence of dietitian during follow-up. Daily urinary output was collected at 90% of the centers, but urea and sodium excretions were determined in only 59% and 57% of cases, respectively. The rate of assessment for urinary solutes during follow-up was higher at centers where a very low protein diet was prescribed.
The indications about nutritional assessment for CKD patients are poorly translated into practice patterns, especially with respect to the evaluation of nutrient intakes and additional but simple variables such as skinfold-thickness measurement and bioimpedance analysis. The presence of a dedicated dietitian appears to improve the quality of nutritional assessment in CKD.
Background Despite advances in pharmacotherapy of lipid disorders, many dyslipidemic patients do not attain sufficient lipid lowering to mitigate risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ...Several classes of novel lipid-lowering agents are being evaluated to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is effective in acutely lowering the plasma concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), and novel lipid-lowering drugs may dampen the lipid rebound effect of LA, with the possibility that LA frequency may be decreased, in some cases even be discontinued. Sources of material This document builds on current American Society for Apheresis guidelines and, for the first time, makes recommendations from summarized data of the emerging lipid-lowering drug classes (inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 or microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, high-density lipoprotein mimetic), including the available evidence on combination therapy with LA with respect to the management of patients with dyslipidemia. Abstract of findings Recommendations for different indications are given based on the latest evidence. However, except for lomitapide in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and alirocumab/evolocumab in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia subjects, limited data are available on the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy. More studies on combining LA with novel lipid-lowering drugs are needed. Conclusion Novel lipid-lowering agents have potential to improve the performance of LA, but more evidence is needed. The Multidisciplinary International Group for Hemapheresis TherapY and Metabolic DIsturbances Contrast scientific society aims to establish an international registry of clinical experience on LA combination therapy to expand the evidence on this treatment in individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
PDF