In two phase 3 placebo-controlled, randomized trials in 1012 and 1040 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, solanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that preferentially binds ...soluble forms of amyloid, did not improve cognition or functional status.
Alzheimer's disease is associated with the accumulation of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. One approach to reducing brain amyloid involves increasing the clearance of Aβ by means of prolonged treatment with monoclonal antibodies directed against this peptide. In preclinical studies, a murine antibody that targeted the central domain of Aβ and was selective for soluble forms slowed Aβ deposition in a transgenic mouse model
1
; in another transgenic murine model, Aβ–antibody complexes were present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma, and behavioral deficits were reversed without a decrease in amyloid plaques, as assessed by . . .
In this placebo-controlled trial, the γ-secretase inhibitor semagacestat did not improve cognitive status in patients with Alzheimer's disease and was associated with more adverse events than ...placebo, including skin cancers and infections.
Alzheimer's disease begins decades before the appearance of clinical symptoms, with the deposition of aggregated amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide plaques in the cortex and hippocampus. This protein is cleaved from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the sequential action of β- and γ-secretases, producing fragments that include Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42. Since the accumulation of aggregated Aβ is associated with disease progression, both β-secretase and γ-secretase represent potential therapeutic targets. Multiple small molecules can inhibit γ-secretase in vitro,
1
–
4
but Notch and other transmembrane proteins are also substrates for γ-secretase,
1
–
4
and studies have raised concern that the inhibition of γ-secretase could . . .
In two randomized trials, the use of gantenerumab (an anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody) did not lead to slower clinical decline than placebo over 116 weeks among persons with early Alzheimer’s disease.
Identifying predictors of conversion to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critically important for AD prevention and targeted treatment.
To compare various clinical and biomarker trajectories for tracking ...progression and predicting conversion from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to probable AD.
Participants were from the ADNI-1 study. We assessed the ability of 33 longitudinal biomarkers to predict time to AD conversion, accounting for demographic and genetic factors. We used joint modelling of longitudinal and survival data to examine the association between changes of measures and disease progression. We also employed time-dependent receiver operating characteristic method to assess the discriminating capability of the measures.
23 of 33 longitudinal clinical and imaging measures are significant predictors of AD conversion beyond demographic and genetic factors. The strong phenotypic and biological predictors are in the cognitive domain (ADAS-Cog; RAVLT), functional domain (FAQ), and neuroimaging domain (middle temporal gyrus and hippocampal volume). The strongest predictor is ADAS-Cog 13 with an increase of one SD in ADAS-Cog 13 increased the risk of AD conversion by 2.92 times.
Prediction of AD conversion can be improved by incorporating longitudinal change information, in addition to baseline characteristics. Cognitive measures are consistently significant and generally stronger predictors than imaging measures.
Gantenerumab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. Reply Bateman, Randall J; Smith, Janice; Doody, Rachelle S
The New England journal of medicine,
2024-Feb-29, 20240229, Volume:
390, Issue:
9
Journal Article
Summary Background In preclinical studies, davunetide promoted microtubule stability and reduced tau phosphorylation. Because progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is linked to tau pathology, ...davunetide could be a treatment for PSP. We assessed the safety and efficacy of davunetide in patients with PSP. Methods In a double-blind, parallel group, phase 2/3 trial, participants were randomly assigned with permuted blocks in a 1:1 ratio to davunetide (30 mg twice daily, intranasally) or placebo for 52 weeks at 48 centres in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, and the USA. Participants met the modified Neuroprotection and Natural History in Parkinson Plus Syndrome study criteria for PSP. Primary endpoints were the change from baseline in PSP Rating Scale (PSPRS) and Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) scale at up to 52 weeks. All participants and study personnel were masked to treatment assignment. Analysis was by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov , number NCT01110720. Findings 313 participants were randomly assigned to davunetide (n=157) or to placebo (n=156), and 241 (77%) completed the study (118 and 156 in the davunetide and placebo groups, respectively). There were no differences in the davunetide and placebo groups in the baseline PSPRS and SEADL. The davunetide and placebo groups did not differ in the change from baseline in PSPRS (median 11·8 95% CI 10·5 to 13·0 vs 11·8 10·5 to 13·0, respectively, p=0·41) or SEADL (−0·20 −0·20 to −0·17 vs −0·20 −0·22 to −0·17, respectively, p=0·92). 54 serious adverse events were reported in each of the treatment groups, including 11 deaths in the davunetide group and ten in the placebo group. The frequency of nasal adverse events was greater in the davunetide group than in the placebo group (epistaxis 18 12% of 156 vs 13 8% of 156, rhinorrhoea 15 10% vs eight 5%, and nasal discomfort 15 10% vs one <1%). Interpretation Davunetide is not an effective treatment for PSP. Clinical trials of disease-modifying treatment are feasible in patients with PSP and should be pursued with other promising tau-directed treatments. Funding Allon Therapeutics.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Summary Background Although treatments for Alzheimer's disease sometimes improve cognition, functional ability, or behaviour compared with baseline levels, such improvements are inconsistent across ...studies and measures, and effects diminish over time. More effective treatments are needed. We assessed the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of dimebon in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Methods We enrolled 183 patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (mini-mental state examination MMSE scores 10–24) at 11 sites in Russia. Patients were randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation scheme to receive oral dimebon, 20 mg three times a day (60 mg/day n=89), or matched placebo (n=94). Other antidementia drugs were not allowed. The primary outcome measure assessed cognition, the difference in mean change from baseline to week 26, or last completed observation on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale (ADAS-cog). All patients and study personnel were blinded throughout the study. We compared dimebon with placebo with an intention-to-treat analysis, with last observation carried forward (ITT-LOCF) imputation. Analyses were repeated on the fully evaluable population, defined as all patients in the intention-to-treat population who had an ADAS-cog at week 26 and at least 80% compliance. 134 patients (68 in dimebon group, 66 in placebo group) enrolled in the 6-month blinded extension phase of the study. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov , number NCT00377715. Findings 155 (85%) patients completed the trial (78 88% in dimebon group, 77 82% in placebo group). Treatment with dimebon resulted in significant benefits in ADAS-cog compared with placebo (ITT-LOCF) at week 26 (mean drug-placebo difference −4·0 95% CI −5·73 to −2·28; p<0·0001). Results of the ITT-LOCF and the evaluable population analyses were much the same for all measures. Patients given dimebon were significantly improved over baseline for ADAS-cog (mean difference −1·9 −2·92 to −0·85; p=0·0005). Dimebon was well tolerated: dry mouth and depressed mood or depression were the most common adverse events associated with dimebon (12 14% patients for each symptom by week 26). The percentage of patients who had adverse events in the two groups did not differ. Interpretation Dimebon was safe, well tolerated, and significantly improved the clinical course of patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Funding Medivation (USA).
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
This review describes the research and development process of gantenerumab, a fully human anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody in development to treat early symptomatic and asymptomatic Alzheimer's ...disease (AD). Anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies can substantially reverse amyloid plaque pathology and may modify the course of the disease by slowing or stopping its clinical progression. Several molecules targeting amyloid have failed in clinical development due to drug-related factors (e.g., treatment-limiting adverse events, low potency, poor brain penetration), study design/methodological issues (e.g., disease stage, lack of AD pathology confirmation), and other factors. The US Food and Drug Administration's approval of aducanumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody as the first potential disease-modifying therapy for AD, signaled the value of more than 20 years of drug development, adding to the available therapies the first nominal success since cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine were approved. BODY: Here, we review over 2 decades of gantenerumab development in the context of scientific discoveries in the broader AD field. Key learnings from the field were incorporated into the gantenerumab phase 3 program, including confirmed amyloid positivity as an entry criterion, an enriched clinical trial population to ensure measurable clinical decline, data-driven exposure-response models to inform a safe and efficacious dosing regimen, and the use of several blood-based biomarkers. Subcutaneous formulation for more pragmatic implementation was prioritized as a key feature from the beginning of the gantenerumab development program.
The results from the gantenerumab phase 3 programs are expected by the end of 2022 and will add critical information to the collective knowledge on the search for effective AD treatments.
Full text
Available for:
IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
IMPORTANCE: Alzheimer disease (AD), a neurodegenerative disease characterized by β-amyloid plaques and τ tangles in the brain, represents an unmet medical need with no fully approved therapeutics to ...modify disease progression. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of crenezumab, a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin G4 antibody targeting β-amyloid oligomers, in participants with prodromal to mild (early) AD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two phase 3 multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group efficacy and safety studies of crenezumab in participants with early AD, CREAD and CREAD2, were initiated in 2016 and 2017, respectively, and were designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of crenezumab in participants with early AD. CREAD (194 sites in 30 countries) and CREAD2 (209 sites in 27 countries) were global multicenter studies. A total of 3736 and 3664 participants were screened in CREAD and CREAD2, respectively. A total of 3736 and 3664 participants were screened in CREAD and CREAD2, respectively. Both trials enrolled individuals aged 50 to 85 years with early AD. Participants with some comorbidities and evidence of cerebral infarction or more than 4 microbleeds or areas of leptomeningeal hemosiderosis on magnetic resonance imaging were excluded. After 2923 and 2858 were excluded, respectively, 813 participants in CREAD and 806 in CREAD2 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either placebo or crenezumab. In the final analysis, there were 409 participants in the placebo group and 404 in the crenezumab group in CREAD and 399 in the placebo group and 407 in the crenezumab group in CREAD2. Data were analyzed up until January 2019 and August 2019, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received placebo or 60 mg/kg crenezumab intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 100 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change from baseline to week 105 in Clinical Dementia Rating–Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) score. RESULTS: There were 813 participants in CREAD (mean SD age, 70.7 8.2 years; 483 female and 330 male) and 806 in CREAD2 (mean SD age, 70.9 7.7 years; 456 female and 350 male). Baseline characteristics were balanced between both groups. The between-group difference in mean change from baseline in CDR-SB score (placebo minus crenezumab) was −0.17 (95% CI, −0.86 to 0.53; P = .63) at week 105 in the CREAD study (88 placebo; 86 crenezumab). Compared with previous trials, no new safety signals were identified, and amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema were rare, mild, and transient. No meaningful changes in AD biomarkers were observed. Both studies were discontinued following a preplanned interim analysis indicating that CREAD was unlikely to meet the primary end point. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Crenezumab was well tolerated but did not reduce clinical decline in participants with early AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: CREAD, NCT02670083; CREAD2, NCT03114657
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide safety and efficacy data for regulatory approval of antidementia drugs, but offer limited data regarding real-world effectiveness. ...Long-term observational controlled studies (LTOCs) extend our understanding by providing longitudinal data across multiple stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Methods Comparisons of strengths, limitations, evidence level, and results for monotherapy (cholinesterase inhibitors) and combination therapy (cholinesterase inhibitors + memantine) in RCTs versus LTOCs were made. Results Similar to RCTs, LTOCs have shown that both monotherapy and combination therapy are associated with slower cognitive and functional decline. Combination therapy is associated with better cognitive outcomes and greater delays in time to nursing home admission versus monotherapy or no treatment. Persistent antidementia drug treatment is associated with slower decline in cognition, daily function, and global severity, even in patients with advanced disease. Conclusions LTOCs provide complementary evidence regarding effectiveness of antidementia therapy over many years, a time course relevant to AD management. These findings also provide compelling arguments in favor of using LTOCs to estimate effectiveness, risk–benefit, and costs of AD treatments.
Full text
Available for:
FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK