Introduction
Postoperative collections are an important cause of morbidity following obesity surgery. Surgical revision is most often required if general sepsis is present. Conservative treatment ...consists of broad spectrum antibiotics and percutaneous drainage of any collection. EUS drainage is a new technique that is gaining momentum allowing an easy access to collections close to the GI tract.
Materials and Methods
We present the case report of a 39-year-old woman who underwent to robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. She developed a jejuno-jejunal dehiscence treated with revision surgery. Afterward, a pelvic collection/hematoma was highlighted; however, neither percutaneous approach nor surgery succeeded in draining it.
Results
EUS-guided deployment of a fully covered lumen-apposing metal stent was performed. Subsequently, two necrosectomies were required to remove necrotic tissue and clots from the perirectal cavity. Finally, three double pigtail stents were deployed to promote healing. The patient spontaneously expelled the stents with the stool, and she is asymptomatic after a follow-up of 3 months.
Conclusion
EUS transmural rectal drainage may represent a sound option for the treatment of pelvic postoperative collections. FCLAMS deployment guarantees a rapid drainage allowing to perform an endoscopic necrosectomy.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Introduction
Despite advances in treating gastric staple line leaks after bariatric surgical procedures, chronic leaks have been reported. Failure of their treatment frequently leads to radical ...surgery. We aimed to describe a strategy for preventing occurrence of chronic gastric leaks after complicated sleeve gastrectomy in patients necessitating relaparoscopy and external drainage as a first step of gastric leak management.
Methods
Data from 14 consecutive patients admitted for gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients included underwent relaparoscopy and external drainage as first step of management.
Results
Median time to gastric leak detection was 4 days. Emergency relaparoscopy allowed peritoneal lavage and external drainage placement next to the leak. Median time between surgery and endoscopic internal drainage (EID) was 4 days. Progressive external drainage mobilization started after 2 days. Control endoscopy was performed every 4 weeks until healing. A median interval of 112 days was necessary before healing in 13 patients. Thirteen patients (92.8%) had no gastric leak recurrence at 1 year. In one patient, EID was considerably delayed and external drainage mobilization prolonged, leading to chronic gastric leak and total gastrectomy after 18 months.
Conclusion
This study reports for the first time a well-standardized protocol of early EID after relaparoscopy coupled to rapid external drainage removal for effectively treating complicated cases of sleeve gastrectomy
.
Bariatric surgeons should be aware of such therapeutic strategies and include them in their arsenal against postoperative gastric staple line leaks in severely obese patients.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Introduction
Treatment of pancreato-biliary disorders after gastric bypass is challenging due to altered anatomy. Several techniques have been proposed to overcome this condition; however, none has ...emerged as the gold standard treatment. Furthermore, a decision-making algorithm evaluating when and why apply one technique over another is still lacking.
Objectives
To describe a novel trans-gastric approach to allow endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) anatomy soon after prior laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and to propose a decision-making algorithm for selection of the most suitable technique according a tailored approach.
Setting
Private hospital.
Methods
Between January and March 2020, patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy referred to our tertiary center to undergo ERCP after recent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were retrospectively evaluated. A 20 french (Fr) gastrostomy was performed during cholecystectomy. A single-stage ERCP was carried out by means of temporary trans-gastric stent deployment over a 20 Fr gastrostomy.
Results
A total of 5 patients (mean age 41; mean body mass index 48.3) were enrolled. ERCP was performed after an average of 2 days from surgery. Technical and clinical success was achieved in 100%. No adverse events occurred. Spontaneous closure of the gastrostomy after its bedside removal was observed in all cases.
Conclusions
Our approach allows to perform a single-stage ERCP in RYGB patients, early after LC, with no need of any other re-interventions. Any surgeon facing unexpected biliary disorders, during LC, can easily perform a 20 Fr gastrostomy thus allowing the patient to undergo early ERCP without any delay.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Background and Aims
Endoscopy is effective in management of bariatric surgery (BS) adverse events (AEs) but a comprehensive evaluation of long-term results is lacking. Our aim is to assess the ...effectiveness of a standardized algorithm for the treatment of BS-AE.
Patients and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 1020 consecutive patients treated in our center from 2012 to 2020, collecting data on demographics, type of BS, complications, and endoscopic treatment. Clinical success (CS) was evaluated considering referral delay, healing time, surgery, and complications type. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables of CS.
Results
In the study period, we treated 339 fistulae (33.2%), 324 leaks (31.8%), 198 post-sleeve gastrectomy twist/stenosis (19.4%), 95 post-RYGB stenosis (9.3 %), 37 collections (3.6%), 15 LAGB migrations (1.5%), 7 weight regains (0.7%), and 2 hemorrhages (0.2%). Main endoscopic treatments were as follows: pigtail-stent positioning under endoscopic view for both leaks (CS 86.1%) and fistulas (CS 77.2%), or under EUS-guidance for collections (CS 88.2%); dilations and/or stent positioning for sleeve twist/stenosis (CS 80.6%) and bypass stenosis (CS 81.5%). After a median (IQR) follow-up of 18.5 months (4.29–38.68), complications rate was 1.9%. We found a 1% increased risk of redo-surgery every 10 days of delay to the first endoscopic treatment. Endoscopically treated patients had a more frequent regular diet compared to re-operated patients.
Conclusions
Endoscopic treatment of BS-AEs following a standardized algorithm is safe and effective. Early endoscopic treatment is associated with an increased CS rate.
Graphical abstract
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Management of biliary disorders in patients with altered anatomy may be challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gastrointestinal anastomosis using a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was ...introduced to allow endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) in such cases. However, the appropriate stent indwelling time remains uncertain. We report long-term LAMS deployment after duodenojejunal or jejunojejunal anastomosis (EUS-DJA) to allow endoscopic reinterventions in cases of recurrences.
11 consecutive patients underwent EUS-DJA with long-standing LAMS between January 2017 and December 2018. Over a 12-month period, ERC treatment was carried out with multiple endoscopic sessions across the DJA.
Technical success was 91 % (10/11) for EUS-DJA and 100 % for ERC. Four patients presented stricture recurrence at a mean of 489 days (standard deviation SD 31.7) after the end of ERC treatment. A novel ERC across the LAMS anastomosis was feasible in all cases. At a mean of 781 days (SD 253.1), all LAMS remained in place with no evidence of complications.
Long-term LAMS placement after EUS-DJA may be feasible and safe for direct access to the excluded limb.
Background
Submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the gastrointestinal tract are a rare pathological entity comprising a wide variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. Even if most SMTs are benign ...tumors (e.g., leiomyomas), a smaller portion may have a malignant potential (e.g., gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)). Preoperative diagnosis of SMT in bariatric patients may arise challenging clinical dilemmas. Long-term surveillance may be difficult after bariatric surgery. Moreover, according to SMT location, its presence may interfere with planned surgery. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has emerged as an effective approach for minimally invasive en bloc excision of SMTs. This is the first case series of STER for SMTs before bariatric surgery.
Methods
Seven female patients underwent STER for removal of SMTs before bariatric surgery. All lesions were incidentally diagnosed at preoperative endoscopy. STER procedural steps comprised mucosal incision, submucosal tunneling, lesion enucleation, and closure of mucosal defect.
Results
En bloc removal of SMT was achieved in all cases. Mean procedural time was of 45 min (SD 18.6). No adverse event occurred. Mean size of the lesions was 20.6 mm (SD 5.8). Histological diagnoses were 5 leyomiomas, 1 lipoma, and 1 low grade GIST. Bariatric procedure was performed after a mean period of 4.1 months (SD 1.6) from endoscopic resection.
Conclusion
STER is a safe and effective treatment for the management of SMT even in bariatric patients awaiting surgery. Preoperative endoscopic resection of SMTs has the advantages of reducing the need for surveillance and removing lesions that could interfere with planned surgery. STER did not altered accomplishment of bariatric procedures.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Background
Post-operative collections are a recognized source of morbidity after abdominal surgery. Percutaneous drainage is currently considered the standard treatment but not all collections are ...accessible using this method. Since the adoption of EUS, endoscopic transmural drainage has become an attractive option in the management of such complications. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and modalities of endoscopic transmural drainage in the treatment of post-operative collections.
Methods
Data of all patients referred to our dedicated multidisciplinary facility from 2014 to 2017 for endoscopic drainage of symptomatic post-operative collections after failure of percutaneous drainage or when it was deemed impossible, were retrospectively analyzed.
Results
Thirty-two patients (17 males and 15 females) with a median age of 53 years old (range 31–74) were included. Collections resulted from pancreatic (
n
= 10), colorectal (
n
= 6), bariatric (
n
= 5), and other type of surgery (
n
= 11). Collection size was less than 5 cm in diameter in 10 (31%), between 5 and 10 cm in 17 (53%) ,and more than 10 cm in 5 (16%) patients. The median time from surgery to endoscopic drainage was 38 days (range 6–360). Eight (25%) patients underwent endoscopic guided drainage whereas 24 (75%) patients underwent EUS-guided drainage. Technical success was 100% and clinical success was achieved in 30 (93.4%) after a mean follow-up of 13.5 months (1.2–24.8). Overall complication was 12.5% including four patients who bled following trans-gastric drainage treated with conservative therapy.
Conclusions
The present series suggests that endoscopic transmural drainage represents an interesting alternative in the treatment of post-operative collection when percutaneous drainage is not possible or fails.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
PDF
