A randomized trial involving patients with metastatic prostate cancer whose disease progressed after receipt of docetaxel and hormonal therapy showed that cabazitaxel was superior to an ...androgen-signaling–targeted agent in extending imaging-based progression-free survival, overall survival, and PSA response.
Cross-talk between signal transduction pathways likely contributes to hormone resistance in metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Everolimus, an oral inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin, has ...restored sensitivity in endocrine-resistance models and shown anticancer activity in early-phase mBC clinical trials. This analysis evaluated efficacy and safety of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen in patients with mBC resistant to aromatase inhibitors (AIs).
This open-label, phase II study randomly assigned postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, AI-resistant mBC to tamoxifen 20 mg/d plus everolimus 10 mg/d (n = 54) or tamoxifen 20 mg/d alone (n = 57). Randomization was stratified by primary and secondary hormone resistance. Primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the percentage of all patients with a complete or partial response or stable disease at 6 months. No formal statistical comparison between groups was planned.
The 6-month CBR was 61% (95% CI, 47 to 74) with tamoxifen plus everolimus and 42% (95% CI, 29 to 56) with tamoxifen alone. Time to progression (TTP) increased from 4.5 months with tamoxifen alone to 8.6 months with tamoxifen plus everolimus, corresponding to a 46% reduction in risk of progression with the combination (hazard ratio HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.81). Risk of death was reduced by 55% with tamoxifen plus everolimus versus tamoxifen alone (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.81). The main toxicities associated with tamoxifen plus everolimus were fatigue (72% v 53% with tamoxifen alone), stomatitis (56% v 7%), rash (44% v 7%), anorexia (43% v 18%), and diarrhea (39% v 11%).
This study suggests that tamoxifen plus everolimus increased CBR, TTP, and overall survival compared with tamoxifen alone in postmenopausal women with AI-resistant mBC.
Eribulin mesylate (EM) was recently approved for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) chemotherapy (CT) in late lines by the FDA, with debated results in second line. We evaluated outcomes in breast cancer ...patients receiving EM as second, third and fourth line in a national real‐life cohort of 16,703 consecutive MBC patients initiating their first metastatic therapeutic line between 2008 and 2014. Primary and secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). An imbalance was seen for HER2+ tumors and concomitant anti‐HER2 targeted therapies use, we thus performed a subanalysis in HER2− patients. PFS and OS were significantly better in EM patients in third and fourth lines, compared to “Other chemotherapies” patients (PFS: 4.14 vs. 3.02 months, p = 0.0010; 3.61 vs. 2.53 months, p = 0.0102, third and fourth‐line; OS: 11.27 vs. 7.65 months, p = 0.0001; 10.91 vs. 5.95 months, p < 0.0001, third and fourth‐line). No significant difference was reported in second‐line (PFS: 5.06 vs. 4.14 months, p = 0.1171; OS: 13.99 vs. 11.66 months, p = 0.151). Among HER2− patients, a significant difference was seen for all lines, including 2nd‐line (PFS: 4.57 vs. 3.91 months, p = 0.0379; OS: 14.98 vs. 10.51 months, p = 0.0113). In this large real‐world database, HER2‐negative MBC patients receiving EM in second or later CT line presented significantly better PFS and OS. This difference disappeared in second line in the overall population, probably because of the imbalance in HER2‐targeted treatments use. Our results mirror those of the published randomized trials. The effect of anti‐HER2 therapies addition in this setting still needs to be defined.
What's new?
An emerging therapy for metastatic breast cancer may extend survival over other chemotherapies. Eribulin mesylate (EM), a microtubule‐dynamics inhibitor, was approved by the FDA in 2010 as a later‐line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Here, the authors evaluated EM effectiveness by analyzing data from 16,703 MBC patients. Treatment with EM as a third or fourth line therapy improved survival compared to other chemotherapy, but as a second line therapy, EM only benefited patients with HER2‐ disease. Since this trial was retrospective, not randomized, different proportions of patients in the two treatment groups received HER‐targeting therapies, which may have influenced the result.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
The outcomes and best treatment strategies for germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm) carriers with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remain uncertain. We compared the overall survival and the first line ...progression free survival (PFS1) of patients with a gBRCAm identified at initiation of first‐line treatment with those of BRCA wild‐type (WT) and not‐tested (NT) individuals in the ESME real‐world database of MBC patients between 2008 and 2016 (NCT03275311). Among the 20 624 eligible patients, 325 had a gBRCAm, 1138 were WT and 19 161 NT. Compared with WT, gBRCAm carriers were younger, and had more aggressive diseases. At a median follow‐up of 50.5 months, median OS was 30.6 (95%CI: 21.9‐34.3), 35.8 (95%CI: 32.2‐37.8) and 39.3 months (95% CI: 38.3‐40.3) in the gBRCAm, WT and NT subgroups, respectively. Median PFS1 was 7.9 (95%CI: 6.6‐9.3), 7.8 (95%CI: 7.3‐8.5) and 9.7 months (95%CI, 9.5‐10.0). In the multivariable analysis conducted in the whole cohort, gBRCAm status had however no independent prognostic impact on OS and PFS1. Though, in the triple‐negative subgroup, gBRCAm patients had better OS and PFS1 (HR vs WT = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.60‐0.97; P = .027 and 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55‐0.86; P = .001, respectively). In contrast, in patients with HR+/HER2 negative cancers, PFS1 appeared significantly and OS non significantly lower for gBRCAm carriers (PFS1: HR vs WT = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.03‐1.46; P = .024; OS:HR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.97‐1.52, P = .089). In conclusion, gBRCA1/2 status appears to have divergent survival effects in MBC according to IHC subtype.
What's new?
Despite the recent approval of novel therapeutics for germline BRCA1/2‐mutated metastatic breast cancer, data regarding outcomes and optimal treatment strategies are lacking. This study assessed the impact of germline BRCA mutations on metastatic breast cancer survival using data from a cohort of patients treated in an era predating PARP inhibitors. Although germline BRCA mutation had no independent prognostic impact on survival, divergent prognostic effects according to tumor subtype were observed. These effects were pronounced among germline mutation carriers with luminal breast cancer, who experienced worse progression‐free survival. The observations highlight the importance of deciphering BRCA status early in clinical care.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Summary Background Poor prognosis germ-cell tumours are only cured in about half of patients. We aimed to assess whether treatment intensification based on an early tumour marker decline will improve ...progression-free survival for patients with germ-cell tumours. Methods In this phase 3, multicentre, randomised trial, patients were enrolled from France (20 centres), USA (one centre), and Slovakia (one centre). Patients were eligible if they were older than 16 years, had evidence of testicular, retroperitoneal, or mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumours based on histological findings or clinical evidence and highly elevated serum human chorionic gonadotropin or alfa-fetoprotein concentrations that matched International Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group poor prognosis criteria. After one cycle of BEP (intravenous cisplatin 20 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, etoposide 100 mg/m2 per day for 5 days, and intramuscular or intravenous bleomycin 30 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15), patients' human chorionic gonadotropin and alfa-fetoprotein concentrations were measured at day 18–21. Patients with a favourable decline in human chorionic gonadotropin and alfa-fetoprotein continued BEP (Fav-BEP group) for 3 additonal cycles, whereas patients with an unfavourable decline were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either BEP (Unfav-BEP group) or a dose-dense regimen (Unfav-dose-dense group), consisting of intravenous paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 over 3 h on day 1) before BEP plus intravenous oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 over 3 h on day 10; two cycles), followed by intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 1), intravenous ifosfamide (2 g/m2 over 3 h on days 10, 12, and 14), plus mesna (500 mg/m2 at 0, 3, 7 and 11 h), and bleomycin (25 units per day, by continuous infusion for 5 days on days 10–14; two cycles), with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (lenograstim) support. Centrally blocked computer-generated randomisation stratified by centre was used. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and the efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population. The planned trial accrual was completed in May, 2012, and follow-up is ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00104676. Findings Between Nov 28, 2003, and May 16, 2012, 263 patients were enrolled and 254 were available for tumour marker assessment. Of these 51 (20%) had a favourable marker assessment, and 203 (80%) had an unfavourable tumour marker decline; 105 were randomly assigned to the Unfav-dose-dense group and 98 to the Unfav-BEP group. 3-year progression-free survival was 59% (95% CI 49–68) in the Unfav-dose-dense group versus 48% (38–59) in the Unfav-BEP group (HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·44–1·00, p=0·05). 3-year progression-free survival was 70% (95% CI 57–81) in the Fav-BEP group (HR 0·66, 95% CI 0·49–0·88, p=0·01 for progression-free survival compared with the Unfav-BEP group). More grade 3–4 neurotoxic events (seven 7% vs one 1%) and haematotoxic events occurred in the Unfav-dose-dense group compared with in the Unfav-BEP group; there was no difference in grade 1–2 febrile neutropenia (18 17% vs 18 18%) or toxic deaths (one 1% in both groups). Salvage high-dose chemotherapy plus a stem-cell transplant was required in six (6%) patients in the Unfav-dose-dense group and 16 (16%) in the Unfav-BEP group. Interpretation Personalised treatment with chemotherapy intensification reduces the risk of progression or death in patients with poor prognosis germ-cell tumours and an unfavourable tumour marker decline. Funding Institut National du Cancer (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique).
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Abstract Background There is an urgent need for qualified predictive biomarkers of sensitivity for the treatments used in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We attempted to ...identify ready-to-use clinical predictors of improved outcome in metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) patients treated with next generation androgen receptor (AR) axis targeted drugs. Patients and methods We reviewed a cohort of patients who received AR axis targeted drugs for CRPC at two major French cancer centres. The predictive role of several clinical, biological and radiological parameters on progression-free survival (PFS) was studied. Results The study cohort consisted of 173 patients. Median duration of response to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (time to castration resistance, TTCRPC) was 17.8 months. The 50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate to AR axis targeted drugs was 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 6–27) and 41% (95% CI: 30–47) in patients with TTCRPC of under and over 12 months respectively ( p = 0.005). Median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.1–3.9) and 5.8 (95% CI: 4.6–7.8; HR: 0.58, p = 0.002). In patients treated with post-docetaxel enzalutamide ( n = 57), median PFS was 2.8 months and 8.6 months, (Hazard ratio (HR) = 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6–5.8, p = 0.0016) according to TTCRPC, whereas no difference was observed in placebo-treated patients ( n = 27). The 50% PSA response rate to enzalutamide was 8% (95% CI: 0–38) and 58% (95% CI: 42–73) in patients with a TTCRPC of under and over 12 months respectively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion The previous duration of response to ADT is a predictor of sensitivity to next generation AR axis targeted drugs in patients with mCRPC.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
This multinational, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial assessed the efficacy and tolerability of the oral platinum analog satraplatin in patients with metastatic ...castrate-refractory prostate cancer (CRPC) experiencing progression after one prior chemotherapy regimen.
Nine hundred fifty patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral satraplatin (n = 635) 80 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 of a 35-day cycle and prednisone 5 mg twice daily or placebo (n = 315) and prednisone 5 mg twice daily. Primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was time to pain progression (TPP).
A 33% reduction (hazard ratio HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.77; P < .001) was observed in the risk of progression or death with satraplatin versus placebo. This effect was maintained irrespective of prior docetaxel treatment. No difference in OS was seen between the satraplatin and placebo arms (HR = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .80). Compared with placebo, satraplatin significantly reduced TPP (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.79; P < .001). Satraplatin was generally well tolerated, although myelosuppression and GI disorders occurred more frequently with satraplatin.
Oral satraplatin delayed progression of disease and pain in patients with metastatic CRPC experiencing progression after initial chemotherapy but did not provide a significant OS benefit. Satraplatin was generally well tolerated. These results suggest activity for satraplatin in patients with CRPC who experience progression after initial chemotherapy.
Abstract Background The Glass model developed in 2003 uses prognostic factors for noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer (NCMPC) to define subgroups with good, intermediate, and poor prognosis. ...Objective To validate NCMPC risk groups in a more recently diagnosed population and to develop a more sensitive prognostic model. Design, setting, and participants NCMPC patients were randomized to receive continuous androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without docetaxel in the GETUG-15 phase 3 trial. Potential prognostic factors were recorded: age, performance status, Gleason score, hemoglobin (Hb), prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), metastatic localization, body mass index, and pain. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis These factors were used to develop a new prognostic model using a recursive partitioning method. Before analysis, the data were split into learning and validation sets. The outcome was overall survival (OS). Results and limitations For the 385 patients included, those with good (49%), intermediate (29%), and poor (22%) prognosis had median OS of 69.0, 46.5 and 36.6 mo ( p = 0.001), and 5-yr survival estimates of 60.7%, 39.4%, and 32.1%, respectively ( p = 0.001). The most discriminatory variables in univariate analysis were ALP, pain intensity, Hb, LDH, and bone metastases. ALP was the strongest prognostic factor in discriminating patients with good or poor prognosis. In the learning set, median OS in patients with normal and abnormal ALP was 69.1 and 33.6 mo, and 5-yr survival estimates were 62.1% and 23.2%, respectively. The hazard ratio for ALP was 3.11 and 3.13 in the learning and validation sets, respectively. The discriminatory ability of ALP (concordance C index 0.64, 95% confidence interval CI 0.58–0.71) was superior to that of the Glass risk model (C-index 0.59, 95% CI 0.52–0.66). The study limitations include the limited number of patients and low values for the C-index. Conclusion A new and simple prognostic model was developed for patients with NCMPC, underlying the role of normal or abnormal ALP. Patient summary We analyzed clinical and biological factors that could affect overall survival in noncastrate metastatic prostate cancer. We showed that normal or abnormal alkaline phosphatase at baseline might be useful in predicting survival.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Background
Metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients have a poor prognosis, and curcumin is known to have antineoplastic properties. On the basis of previous phase I and phase ...II studies, we investigated whether the association of curcumin with docetaxel could improve prognosis among mCRPC patients.
Methods
A total of 50 mCRPC patients (included from June 2014 to July 2016) treated with docetaxel in association with oral curcumin (6 g/d for 7 days every 3 weeks) versus placebo were included in this double‐blind, randomized, phase II study. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the time to progression. Among the secondary endpoints, compliance, overall survival, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response, safety, curcumin absorption, and quality of life were investigated. An interim analysis was planned in the modified intention‐to‐treat population with data at 6 months (22 patients per arm).
Results
Despite good compliance and a verified absorption of curcumin, no difference was shown for our primary endpoint: progression‐free survival (PFS) between the placebo and curcumin groups was, respectively, 5.3 months versus 3.7 months, p = 0.75. Similarly, no difference was observed for the secondary objectives: PSA response rate (p = 0.88), overall survival (p = 0.50), and quality of life (p = 0.49 and p = 0.47).
Conclusion
Even though our previous studies and data in the literature seemed to support an association between curcumin and cancer therapies in order to improve patient outcome and prognosis, the results from this interim analysis clearly showed that adding curcumin to mCRPC patients’ treatment strategies was not efficacious. The study was discontinued on the grounds of futility.
In this manuscript, we present the result of the interim analysis of our study conducted in metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. According to previous studies, we investigated whether the association of curcumin to docetaxel could improve prognosis among patients. This study is the first one to explore the efficacy of curcumin in mCRPC treated with docetaxel, with the assessment of serum curcumin levels. The results from this phase II study with such a posology lead us to conclude that curcumin in association with docetaxel does not improve mCRPC patients, nor does it improve progression‐free survival or overall survival.
Full text
Available for:
FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the potential benefit of reintroducing docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with progressive metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had initially responded ...to first‐line docetaxel‐based regimen.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Records were evaluated retrospectively from French patients with mCRPC who had been included in seven controlled clinical studies of docetaxel as first‐line treatment. We identified patients who were confirmed as responders to first‐line treatment, discontinued for reasons other than disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, and who received further docetaxel chemotherapy for disease progression. The primary objective was to assess efficacy in terms of the prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response after resuming a docetaxel‐based chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were overall survival and tolerance.
RESULTS
Of the 148 patients who responded to first‐line docetaxel, 50 received further therapy with docetaxel and were analysed. The median (range) response duration to first‐line docetaxel was 10.3 (4.6–45.7) months and the median docetaxel‐free interval was 18.4 (5.0–46.7) months. Docetaxel was reintroduced as second‐line therapy in 52% of patients and as further lines in 48%. After docetaxel reintroduction, 24 patients (48%) had a 50% decrease in PSA level (95% confidence interval, CI, 34.1–61.8%). The median (95% CI) overall survival from docetaxel reintroduction was 16 (13–20) months. Re‐treatment was well tolerated (6% of grade 3–4 haemotoxicity).
CONCLUSION
Docetaxel reintroduction appears to be effective, with favourable tolerance profiles, in patients with mCRPC having responded to first‐line docetaxel, and should be prospectively assessed in clinical trials against alternative therapies or investigational agents given alone or in combination, to define further management.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, DOBA, FZAB, GIS, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
PDF
