Background: Iron deficiency (ID) and iron deficiency anemia (IDA) cause significant morbidity. Despite being a disease of high prevalence, affecting people with heart failure, chronic kidney disease, ...heavy menstrual bleeding, irritable bowel disease, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), and bariatric surgery, it has low healthcare priority. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates 37% of people who are pregnant, and 30% of women 15-49 years of age worldwide are anemic. Fibroids, which are the leading cause of abnormal uterine bleeding, disproportionately impact people of color. ID and IDA cause fatigue, impaired cognitive function, and poor mental health, eroding quality of life and personal productivity. In addition, IDA has been associated with an increase in all-cause mortality is associated with an increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. Under-treatment of IDA results in avoidable hospitalizations, emergency room visits, blood transfusions, decreased HRQoL, and loss of personal productivity. Despite the significant impact ID and IDA can have on morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, intravenous iron remains underutilized. No study has been performed to date to assess provider practices, knowledge, and perceptions of intravenous iron use. This qualitative study aims to understand trainees' experiences with intravenous iron use in patients with ID and IDA.
Methods: We conducted an inductive reflective thematic analysis of semi-structured qualitative interviews from five focus groups to understand trainees' experiences with and barriers to prescribing intravenous iron in patients with ID and IDA. Internal medicine residents from academic institutions across the country were recruited via snowball sampling. Chief residents from six internal medicine programs were contacted to disseminate sign up links to their residents; programs were chosen for geographic diversity.
Results: Twenty-eight internal medicine residents responded and nineteen residents across five institutions participated (PGY levels 1-3). Thematic analysis of trainees' experiences of caring for patients with conditions characterized by iron deficiency resulted in three main themes: education, systemic factors, and practice pattern. Participants identified a wide range of conditions for which they consider administration of oral or intravenous iron. However, they generally expressed uncertainty as to whether evidence-based guidelines exist to guide their decision-making with the exception of intravenous iron administration in heart failure patients. In addition, systemic factors, such as setting, support staff, hospital formularies, order sets, and insurance status often impacted their decision to use intravenous iron.
Conclusions: There is a wide variation among residents' practice patterns in regard to their comfort with prescribing intravenous iron. The ease or hesitancy with which they do so is greatly influenced by educational and systemic factors. By gaining a deeper understanding of the experiences of trainees we can lay the foundation to develop evidence-based guidelines and educational initiatives for conditions characterized by ID and IDA. Additionally, by identifying both institutional facilitators and barriers, we can cultivate system-based initiatives to improve access to intravenous iron. To assess this need on a larger scale, our next step involves developing a survey that will be widely distributed via national societies. While cost, insurance status, and need for specialty referral were identified as barriers for intravenous iron use, there was no explicit discussion of how these barriers may contribute to healthcare inequity for underserved populations.
Full text
Available for:
IJS, IMTLJ, NUK, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK, ZRSKP
Objectives
There is no standardized protocol for performing educational point‐of‐care ultrasonography (POCUS) that addresses patient‐centered ethical issues such as obtaining informed consent. This ...study sought to define principles for ethical application of educational POCUS and develop consensus‐based best practice guidance.
Methods
A questionnaire was developed by a trained ethicist after literature review with the help of a medical librarian. A diverse panel including experts in medical education, law, and bioethics; medical trainees; and individuals with no medical background was convened. The panel voted on their level of agreement with ethical principles and degree of appropriateness of behaviors in three rounds of a modified Delphi process. A high level of agreement was defined as 80% or greater consensus.
Results
Panelists voted on 38 total items: 15 related to the patient consent and selection process, eight related to practices while performing educational POCUS, and 15 scenarios involving POCUS application. A high level of agreement was achieved for 13 items related to patient consent and selection, eight items related to performance practices, and 10 scenarios of POCUS application.
Conclusions
Based on expert consensus, ethical best practices include obtaining informed consent before performing educational POCUS, allowing patients to decline educational POCUS, informing patients the examination is not intended to be a part of their medical evaluation and is not billed, using appropriate draping techniques, maintaining a professional environment, and disclosing incidental findings in coordination with the primary team caring for the patient. These practices could be implemented at institutions to encourage ethical use of educational POCUS when training physicians, fellows, residents, and medical students.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Due to restraints' consequences for personal liberty and dignity, the threshold to apply restraints is understandably high and heavily regulated. However, there can be clinical scenarios in which ...restraint use can facilitate a patient's freedom. This article considers such a case and examines conditions under which using restraints offers therapeutic benefit for patients with traumatic brain injuries.
Background:
Hospital-based specialist palliative care services are common, yet existing evidence of inpatient generalist providers’ perceptions of collaborating with hospital-based specialist ...palliative care teams has never been systematically assessed.
Aim:
To assess the existing evidence of inpatient generalist palliative care providers’ perceptions of what facilitates or hinders collaboration with hospital-based specialist palliative care teams.
Design:
Narrative literature synthesis with systematically constructed search.
Data sources:
PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ProQuest Social Services databases were searched up to December 2014. Individual journal, citation and reference searching were also conducted. Papers with the views of generalist inpatient professional caregivers who utilised hospital-based specialist palliative care team services were included in the narrative synthesis. Hawker’s criteria were used to assess the quality of the included studies.
Results:
Studies included (n = 23) represented a variety of inpatient generalist palliative care professionals’ experiences of collaborating with specialist palliative care. Effective collaboration is experienced by many generalist professionals. Five themes were identified as improving or decreasing effective collaboration: model of care (integrated vs linear), professional onus, expertise and trust, skill building versus deskilling and specialist palliative care operations. Collaboration is fostered when specialist palliative care teams practice proactive communication, role negotiation and shared problem-solving and recognise generalists’ expertise.
Conclusion:
Fuller integration of specialist palliative care services, timely sharing of information and mutual respect increase generalists’ perceptions of effective collaboration. Further research is needed regarding the experiences of non-physician and non-nursing professionals as their views were either not included or not explicitly reported.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Summary
A social work advisory group recently proposed 41 generalist-level palliative social work activities applicable to any venue, including hospital-based social work, but this applicability has ...not been empirically tested. Therefore, we used critical realist grounded theory analysis of qualitative interviews to explore whether the activities proposed by the advisory group reflect inpatient social workers’ perceptions of their generalist-level palliative activities when caring for patients alongside specialist-level palliative social workers. Fourteen Masters educated social workers from six hospitals in the Midwest United States participated. Corresponding concepts from interview data of hospital-based social workers’ perceptions of what facilitates or hinders collaboration with specialist-level palliative social workers were identified and mapped onto the 41 generalist-level palliative social work activities. We used NVivo to organize and track data.
Findings
Inpatient social workers find it challenging to engage in specific generalist-level palliative social work activities; provision of generalist-level palliative services is shaped by discharge planning duties, the consultation model, and the concentrated role of specialist-level palliative social workers. Competency in cultural and spiritual aspects of care could be lacking.
Applications
Most of the 41 generalist-level palliative social work activities are present in hospital-based social workers’ clinical practice. However, not all activities may be applicable or realizable in the inpatient venue. In the hospital, an emphasis on discharge planning and related time-barriers can mean seriously ill patients and their families lack access to generalist-level palliative social work services. Clarification is needed about which of the 41 activities are relevant to and actionable within the inpatient venue.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Surgical regret often experienced at times of a great loss may cause a surgeon to reflect on their practice and intraoperative decision-making. It is inevitable that in the surgical profession, both ...in training and practice, a surgeon’s decisions will be questioned by themselves, peers, and possibly patients. Here, we explore a case of living donor kidney donation in which the surgeon chooses to discontinue the operation for an incidental finding. Ultimately, this is against the patient’s wishes and a decision over which both the surgeon and patient experience moral hazard and regret. This article explores surgical regret from the lens of an altruistic donor case and a surgeon’s inaction, discussing the ethics of the operative decision-making and surgeon’s viewpoint intra- and post-operatively.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Limited data exist in the specific content of pediatric outpatient ethics consults as compared to inpatient ethics consults. Given the fundamental differences in outpatient and inpatient clinical ...care, we aimed to describe the distinctive nature of ethics consultation in the ambulatory setting. This is a retrospective review at a large, quaternary academic center of all outpatient ethics consults in a 6-year period. Encounter-level demographic data was recorded, and primary ethical issue and contextual features were identified using qualitative conceptual content analysis. A total of 48 consults were identified representing 44 unique patients. The most common primary ethical issue was beneficence and best interest concern comprising 20 (42%) consults, followed by refusal of recommended treatment comprising 11 (23%) consults and patient preference/assent comprising 5 (10%) consults. The most common contextual features were staff-family communication dispute/conflict comprising 28 (58%) consults, followed by legal involvement comprising 25 (52%) consults and quality of life comprising 19 (40%) consults. The most common consulting specialty was hematology/oncology. Ethical issues encountered in the provision of outpatient pediatric care are distinct and differ from those in inpatient consults. Further research is necessary to identify strategies and educational gaps in outpatient ethics consultation to increase its effectiveness and utilization.Limited data exist in the specific content of pediatric outpatient ethics consults as compared to inpatient ethics consults. Given the fundamental differences in outpatient and inpatient clinical care, we aimed to describe the distinctive nature of ethics consultation in the ambulatory setting. This is a retrospective review at a large, quaternary academic center of all outpatient ethics consults in a 6-year period. Encounter-level demographic data was recorded, and primary ethical issue and contextual features were identified using qualitative conceptual content analysis. A total of 48 consults were identified representing 44 unique patients. The most common primary ethical issue was beneficence and best interest concern comprising 20 (42%) consults, followed by refusal of recommended treatment comprising 11 (23%) consults and patient preference/assent comprising 5 (10%) consults. The most common contextual features were staff-family communication dispute/conflict comprising 28 (58%) consults, followed by legal involvement comprising 25 (52%) consults and quality of life comprising 19 (40%) consults. The most common consulting specialty was hematology/oncology. Ethical issues encountered in the provision of outpatient pediatric care are distinct and differ from those in inpatient consults. Further research is necessary to identify strategies and educational gaps in outpatient ethics consultation to increase its effectiveness and utilization.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
PDF
