Abstract Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in clinical practice is generally diagnosed by imaging. Recognition of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction has increased interest in the ...detection and evaluation of this condition and prompted an improved understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different imaging modalities for evaluating diastolic dysfunction. This review briefly provides the pathophysiological background for current clinical and experimental imaging parameters of diastolic dysfunction, discusses the merits of echocardiography relative to other imaging modalities in diagnosing and grading diastolic dysfunction, summarizes lessons from clinical trials that used parameters of diastolic function as an inclusion criterion or endpoint, and indicates current areas of research.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
13.
Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography Spencer, Kirk T.; Flachskampf, Frank A.
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging,
07/2019, Volume:
12, Issue:
7
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
Focused cardiac ultrasonography (FCU) is the use of ultrasonography as an adjunct to physical examination at the point of care. There are ample data supporting the fact that noncardiology trained ...users using small ultrasonography devices can assess left ventricular (LV) enlargement, LV systolic dysfunction, right ventricular (RV) enlargement, left atrial (LA) enlargement, LV hypertrophy, pericardial effusion, and right atrial (RA) pressure elevation more accurately than performing a physical examination. In addition, FCU-trained providers may have skills to perform ultrasonography imaging of body systems outside the heart to supplement their cardiac evaluation. FCU training, including didactic education, proctored imaging, independent imaging, and image interpretation, has been established by several specialties and medical schools. Cardiologists should embrace FCU in their facilities, as the clinical value to patient care is clear. Cardiologists have the responsibility to maintain excellence in the practice of echocardiography while enabling the use of ultrasonography by other medical professionals to augment their clinical assessments conventionally based on physical examination alone.
•FCU is an adjunct of the physical examination performed and interpreted at the point-of-care or bedside which demonstrably improves patient care, especially in acute circumstances.•FCU differs from echocardiography in being shorter and more focused on the presence or absence of a limited number of critical diagnoses which have immediate clinical consequences; it does not require full formal echocardiography or cardiology training but does require some dedicated and structured training.•Training pathways and their quality assurance, the range of its users, medicolegal and economic aspects, the role of focused cardiac ultrasonography with regard to standard echocardiography, the documentation and reporting of focused ultrasonography studies, and finally the potential technological advances such as artificial intelligence will need to be explored in the future.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Background
Reliability of left ventricular function measurements depends on actual biological conditions, repeated registrations and their analyses.
Objective
To investigate test–retest reliability ...of speckle-tracking-derived strain measurements and its determinants compared to the conventional parameters, such as ejection fraction (EF), LV volumes and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE).
Methods
In 30 patients with a wide range of left ventricular function (mean EF 46.4 ± 16.4%, range 14–73%), standard echo views were acquired independently in a blinded fashion by two different echocardiographers in immediate sequence and analyzed off-line by two independent readers, creating 4 data sets per patient. Test–retest reliability of studied parameters was calculated using the smallest detectable change (SDC) and a total, inter-acquisition and inter-reader intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
Results
The smallest detectable change normalized to the mean absolute value of the measured parameter (SDCrel) was lowest for MAPSE (10.7%). SDCrel for EF was similar to GLS (14.2 and 14.7%, respectively), while SDCrel for CS was much higher (35.6%). The intra-class correlation coefficient was excellent (> 0.9) for all measures of the left ventricular function. Intra-patient inter-acquisition reliability (ICCacq) was significantly better than inter-reader reliability (ICCread) (0.984 vs. 0.950,
p
= 0.03) only for EF, while no significant difference was observed for any other LV function parameter. Mean intra-subject standard deviations were significantly correlated to the mean values for CS and LV volumes, but not for the other studied parameters.
Conclusions
In a test–retest setting, both with normal and impaired left ventricular function, the smallest relative detectable change of EF, GLS and MAPSE was similar (11–15%), but was much higher for CS (35%). Surprisingly, reliability of GLS was not superior to that of EF. Acquisition and reader to a similar extent influenced the reliability of measurements of all left ventricular function measures except for ejection fraction, where the reliability was more dependent on the reader than on the acquisition.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
The rapid technological developments of the past decade and the changes in echocardiographic practice brought about by these developments have resulted in the need for updated recommendations to the ...previously published guidelines for cardiac chamber quantification, which was the goal of the joint writing group assembled by the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. This document provides updated normal values for all four cardiac chambers, including three-dimensional echocardiography and myocardial deformation, when possible, on the basis of considerably larger numbers of normal subjects, compiled from multiple databases. In addition, this document attempts to eliminate several minor discrepancies that existed between previously published guidelines.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) traditionally has been characterized as a form of heart failure without therapeutic options, in particular with a lack of response to ...the established therapies of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this is no longer true. Besides physical exercise, risk factor modification, aldosterone blocking agents, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, specific therapies are emerging for specific HFpEF etiologies, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis. This development justifies increased efforts to arrive at specific diagnoses within the umbrella of HFpEF. Cardiac imaging plays by far the largest role in this effort and is discussed in the following review.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Abstract
Left atrial imaging and detailed knowledge of its pathophysiology, especially in the context of heart failure, have become an increasingly important clinical and research focus. This ...development has been accelerated by the growth of non-invasive imaging modalities, advanced image processing techniques, such as strain imaging, and the parallel emergence of catheter-based left atrial interventions like pulmonary vein ablation, left atrial appendage occlusion, and others. In this review, we focus on novel imaging methods for the left atrium, their pathophysiological background, and their clinical relevance for various cardiac conditions and diseases.
Graphical Abstract