Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, yet diagnosis and management remain challenging. Development and use of bleeding assessment tools allows for improved ...stratification of which patients may require further assessment and which patients are most likely to require treatment of their VWD. New options for laboratory assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity include a new platelet-binding assay, the VWF:GPIbM, which is subject to less variability than the ristocetin cofactor activity assay, and collagen-binding assays that provide insight into a different function of VWF. Genetic testing may be helpful in some cases where a type 2 VWD variant is suspected but is usually not helpful in type 1 VWD. Finally, treatment options for VWD are reviewed, including the use of recombinant VWF. Despite these advances, still more work is required to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life for affected patients.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder known in humans. Accurate and timely diagnosis presents numerous challenges.
These evidence-based guidelines of the ...American Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about VWD diagnosis.
ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH established a multidisciplinary guideline panel that included 4 patient representatives and was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC) supported the guideline-development process, including performing or updating systematic evidence reviews up to 8 January 2020. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subsequently subject to public comment.
The panel agreed on 11 recommendations.
Key recommendations of these guidelines include the role of bleeding-assessment tools in the assessment of patients suspected of VWD, diagnostic assays and laboratory cutoffs for type 1 and type 2 VWD, how to approach a type 1 VWD patient with normalized levels over time, and the role of genetic testing vs phenotypic assays for types 2B and 2N. Future critical research priorities are also identified.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) merits consideration of personal and family history of bleeding symptoms along with confirmatory laboratory testing. As the latter yields quantifiable ...results, overreliance on a laboratory diagnosis may occur. However, existing tests for VWD contain potential sources for error. Both intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting these assays can contribute to either falsely normal or falsely abnormal results. This article will discuss the present available assays as well as new developments in diagnostic testing. A clear understanding of the limitations of VWD testing is helpful for ensuring the correct diagnosis of affected patients.
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common bleeding disorder, affecting male and female individuals equally, that often manifests in mucosal bleeding. VWD can be secondary to a quantitative (Type 1 and ...Type 3) or qualitative (Type 2) defects in Von Willebrand factor (VWF). Initial testing includes VWF antigen, as well as a platelet binding assay to differentiate between qualitative and quantitative defects. Further subtyping requires additional testing and is needed to ensure appropriate treatment. Desmopressin, antifibrinolytics, hormonal treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding, and VWF concentrates are commonly used in the treatment of VWD.
Introduction
There are a significant number of patients with mucocutaneous bleeding, specifically heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), who do not have a diagnosed bleeding disorder. These patients receive ...nontargeted interventions and may have suboptimal treatments. Functional assays, particularly for fibrinolytic and rare platelet function defects, are not robust and not readily available.
Aim
We aimed to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of genetic defects associated with rare bleeding disorders and describe alterations of coagulation and fibrinolysis in a cohort of adolescents with HMB.
Methods
We performed a prospective observational cohort study of patients with HMB and unexplained bleeding. The study utilized a next generation sequencing panel and investigational global assays of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Additionally, specific functional assays were performed to help characterize novel variants that were identified.
Results
In 10 of the 17 patients (∼59%), genetic variants were identified on molecular testing. Thrombin generation by calibrated thromboelastography was not significantly altered in this patient population. The clot formation and lysis assay showed a trend towards increased fibrinolysis with rapid phase of decline in 23% of the patients. Further corresponding functional assays and study population are described.
Conclusion
Our study describes a unique correlative model in a homogenous cohort of patients with HMB and unexplained bleeding which may inform future diagnostic algorithms, genotype–phenotype correlations as well as aid in specific targeted treatment approaches. Larger future studies may inform risk stratification of patients and improve health related outcomes in patients with HMB.
Full text
Available for:
FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, yet diagnosis and management remain challenging. Development and use of bleeding assessment tools allows for improved ...stratification of which patients may require further assessment and which patients are most likely to require treatment of their VWD. New options for laboratory assessment of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity include a new platelet-binding assay, the VWF:GPIbM, which is subject to less variability than the ristocetin cofactor activity assay, and collagen-binding assays that provide insight into a different function of VWF. Genetic testing may be helpful in some cases where a type 2 VWD variant is suspected but is usually not helpful in type 1 VWD. Finally, treatment options for VWD are reviewed, including the use of recombinant VWF. Despite these advances, still more work is required to improve diagnosis, treatment, and quality of life for affected patients.
In this issue of Blood, Verhenne et al present data showing the role of platelet-derived von Willebrand factor (VWF) in mediating ischemic stroke injury using a murine model. They created mice with ...either endothelial VWF or platelet-derived VWF and examined each phenotype for bleeding and thrombosis. Their intriguing findings were that mice lacking platelet-derived VWF, but with adequate endothelial VWF stores, demonstrated normal hemostasis in a tail bleeding model and normal carotid artery thrombosis. Mice with only platelet-derived VWF had defective hemostasis and defective carotid artery thrombosis, but experienced significant cerebral infarction using a stroke model with middle cerebral artery occlusion (see figure). In contrast, minimal infarcts were seen for VWF-deficient mice. These data suggest that platelet-derived VWF plays a specific role in stroke pathology.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Recent advances in VWD research have improved our understanding of the genotype and phenotype of VWD. The VWF gene is highly polymorphic, with a large number of sequence variations reported in ...healthy individuals. This can lead to some difficulty when attempting to discern genotype-phenotype correlations because sequence variations may not represent disease. In type 1 VWD, mutations can be found throughout the VWF gene, but likely pathogenic sequence variations are found in only ∼2/3 of type 1 VWD patients. Sequence variations in type 2 VWD are located in the region corresponding to the defect in the VWF protein found in each type 2 variant. In type 3 VWD, sequence variations are not confined to a specific region of the VWF gene and also include large deletions that may not be picked up using conventional sequencing techniques. Use of genetic testing may be most helpful in diagnosis of type 2 VWD, in which a larger number of known, well characterized mutations are present and demonstration of one of these may help to confirm the diagnosis. Bleeding symptoms in general are more severe with decreasing VWF levels and more severe in type 2 and type 3 VWD compared with type 1 VWD. Prediction of phenotype for an individual patient, however, is still difficult, and the addition of genetic data will be most helpful in ascertaining the correct diagnosis for VWD patients.
Although von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, its diagnosis and management are often challenging. Clinical practice guidelines, developed through systematic ...review of the medical literature and considering the best available evidence, provide guidance for common clinical scenarios. However, in the clinical setting, patients often present with characteristics and nuances that may fall outside the realm of available evidence and guidelines, and hence, shared decision-making will be essential in the evaluation and management of these patients. The challenges in the diagnosis of VWD are mainly attributable to the heterogeneity of the disorder, limitations of laboratory assays, and the significant impact of various physiologic processes on von Willebrand factor. The impact of physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor, which may occur in various settings such as pregnancy, inflammation, or aging, remains uncertain, as is the optimal management in these scenarios. Multidisciplinary and individualized care, based on evolving evidence supported by clinicians, patients, caregivers, and stakeholders, will be needed to ensure the highest quality care for those who live with VWD.
•The heterogeneity of von Willebrand disease (VWD) often makes its diagnosis a challenge.•Available assays have limitations and are often significantly influenced by physiologic factors.•Physiologic normalization of von Willebrand factor in those with VWD poses a management dilemma.•Multidisciplinary, individualized care is essential, and several areas require further research.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder. Significant variability exists in management options offered to patients.
These evidence-based guidelines from the American ...Society of Hematology (ASH), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), the National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), and the World Federation of Hemophilia (WFH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and health care professionals in their decisions about management of VWD.
ASH, ISTH, NHF, and WFH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel. Three patient representatives were included. The panel was balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The University of Kansas Outcomes and Implementation Research Unit and the McMaster Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing and updating systematic evidence reviews (through November 2019). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance to clinicians and patients. The panel used the GRADE approach, including GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.
The panel agreed on 12 recommendations and outlined future research priorities.
These guidelines make key recommendations regarding prophylaxis for frequent recurrent bleeding, desmopressin trials to determine therapy, use of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulant therapy, target VWF and factor VIII activity levels for major surgery, strategies to reduce bleeding during minor surgery or invasive procedures, management options for heavy menstrual bleeding, management of VWD in the context of neuraxial anesthesia during labor and delivery, and management in the postpartum setting.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
