In breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery, there is an unmet need for noninvasive predictive biomarkers of response. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ...in particular has been the object of several reports, but few of them have studied the applicability of tagged targeted deep sequencing (tTDS) to clinical practice and its performance compared with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Here, we present the first results from an ongoing study involving a prospectively accrued, monocentric cohort of patients affected by invasive breast cancer, undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with curative intent as per clinical practice. A pretreatment tumor biopsy and plasma samples were collected before and during treatment, after surgery, and every six months henceforth or until relapse, whichever came first. Pretreatment biopsies were sequenced with a 409-gene massive parallel sequencing (MPS) panel, allowing the identification of target mutations and their research in plasma by tTDS and ddPCR as a complementary approach. Using tTDS, we demonstrated the presence of at least one deleterious mutation in all the relapsed cases we studied (n = 4), with an average lead time of six months before clinical relapse. The association with ddPCR was suboptimal, and only one relapsed patient could be identified with such method. tTDS shows potential as an early noninvasive method for the detection of MRD in BC patients.
Full text
Available for:
FZAB, GIS, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Prior exposure to adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and timing to recurrence are crucial factors for first-line treatment choices in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) ...breast cancer (BC) and in clinical trial eligibility, classifying metastatic HR+/HER2− BC as endocrine sensitive (ES) or primary (1ER)/secondary (2ER) resistant. However, this classification is largely based on expert opinion and no proper evidence exists to date to support its possible prognostic and clinical impact.
This analysis included individual patient-level data from 4 adjuvant phase III randomized trials by the Mammella InterGruppo (MIG) and Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) study groups. The impact of endocrine resistance/sensitivity classification on overall survival (mOS, defined as time between date of distant relapse and death) was assessed in both univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models.
Between November 1992 and July 2012, 9058 patients were randomized in 4 trials, of whom 6612 had HR+/HER2− BC. Median follow-up was 9.1 years (interquartile range IQR 5.6–15.0). In the whole cohort, disease-free survival and OS were 90.4% and 96.6% at 5 years, and 79.1% and 89.4% at 10 years, respectively. The estimated hazard of recurrence raised constantly during the first 15 years from diagnosis, being more pronounced during the first 2 years and less pronounced after year 7. Among the 493 patients with a distant relapse as first disease-free survival event and available date on ET completion, 72 (14.6%), 207 (42.0%) and 214 (43.4%) were classified as having 1ER, 2ER and ES, respectively. Median follow-up from diagnosis of a distant relapse was 3.8 years (IQR 1.6–7.5). Patients with 1ER were significantly more likely to be younger, to have N2/N3 nodal status, grade 3 tumours and to develop visceral metastases. Site of first distant relapse was significantly different between the 3 groups (p = 0.005). In patients with 1ER, 2ER and ES breast cancer, median mOS was 27.2, 38.4 and 43.2 months, respectively (p = 0.03). As compared to patients with ES disease, a higher risk of death was observed in those with 1 ER (adjusted Hazard Ratio aHR 1.54; 95% CI 1.03–2.30) and 2ER (aHR 1.17; 95% CI 0.87–1.56) (p = 0.11).
This large analysis with long-term follow-up provides evidence on the prognostic and clinical impact of the currently adopted endocrine resistance/sensitivity classification in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced BC. This classification may be considered a valid tool to guide clinical decision-making and to design future ET trials in the metastatic setting.
AIRC.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
In breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery, there is an unmet need for noninvasive predictive biomarkers of response. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) ...in particular has been the object of several reports, but few of them have studied the applicability of tagged targeted deep sequencing (tTDS) to clinical practice and its performance compared with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Here, we present the first results from an ongoing study involving a prospectively accrued, monocentric cohort of patients affected by invasive breast cancer, undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery with curative intent as per clinical practice. A pretreatment tumor biopsy and plasma samples were collected before and during treatment, after surgery, and every six months henceforth or until relapse, whichever came first. Pretreatment biopsies were sequenced with a 409-gene massive parallel sequencing (MPS) panel, allowing the identification of target mutations and their research in plasma by tTDS and ddPCR as a complementary approach. Using tTDS, we demonstrated the presence of at least one deleterious mutation in all the relapsed cases we studied (n = 4), with an average lead time of six months before clinical relapse. The association with ddPCR was suboptimal, and only one relapsed patient could be identified with such method. tTDS shows potential as an early noninvasive method for the detection of MRD in BC patients.
Full text
Available for:
FZAB, GIS, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a simple and reliable technique to assess breast lesions, although a definitive differential diagnosis (benignity vs. cancer) is achieved approximately in ...60-70% of cases because an inadequate (C1), atypical (C3) or suspicious (C4) category is otherwise reported.
A retrospective analysis of 763 cases with C3 or C4 reports was performed to define their positive predictive value (PPV), as well as the practical implications of clinical and imaging findings as for clinical decision-making. FNACs were collected from January 2003 to September 2012 at the Breast Unit of IRCCS "A.O.U. San Martino-IST" Genoa, with each being received later to definitive histology. The PPV for cancer of C3/C4 categories were computed to measure the accuracy of FNAC; moreover, the PPV was also stratified according to clinical, mammography and sonography data alone or by their combination.
The PPV of C3 and C4 was 21.1% (80/380) and 84.1 % (322/383), respectively. Within each C3/C4 category, a significant direct correlation (p<0.001) between the suspicion index of clinical, mammography and sonography data and cancer detection rate was always observed. The PPV of C3/C4 stratified by the combination of clinical and imaging findings showed satisfactory values in the C3 category only when there was an agreement between clinical and imaging findings, whereas the PPV of the C4 category was always remarkably high (ranging from 92.3% to 100%).
the diagnostic work-up in C4 reports or in patients with a C3 report but with an high suspicion index at clinical or imaging examination should be preferably implemented by means of a core biopsy to optimize the therapeutic planning; given a C3 report with dubious clinical and/or imaging findings, an excisional biopsy (or in alternative vacuum-assisted breast biopsy with complete removal of the nodule) should be preferably performed in order to reach a definitive histological dia gnosis with no further delay.
In the prepertuzumab era, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer who underwent first-line ...trastuzumab-based or lapatinib-based therapy according to prior exposure to (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab.
In this multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted in 14 Italian centres of the Gruppo Italiano Mammella, consecutive patients undergoing first-line trastuzumab or lapatinib-based therapy were included. Analyses were performed according to the type of first-line therapy for metastatic disease (trastuzumab or lapatinib). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were analysed using logistic regression and time-to-event outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models controlling for relevant demographic, clinicopathological and therapy characteristics.
Out of 450 patients included in the study, 416 (92%) received trastuzumab and 34 (7.5%) lapatinib. As compared with the trastuzumab cohort, more patients in the lapatinib cohort had a trastuzumab-free interval <1 month (37% vs 13.9%; p=0.017) and brain metastasis as first site of relapse (38.2% vs 9.4%; p<0.001). Among the 128 patients who relapsed after prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab, 101 (78.9%) received first-line trastuzumab and 27 (21.1%) first-line lapatinib. The following outcomes were observed with first-line lapatinib or trastuzumab, respectively: overall response rate 45.5% vs 61.3% (p=0.184), clinical benefit rate 68.2% vs 72.5% (p=0.691), median progression-free survival (PFS) 11.4 vs 12.0 months (p=0.814) and median overall survival (OS) 34.7 vs 48.2 months (p=0.722). In patients with brain metastasis as first site of relapse, median PFS was 12.2 vs 9.9 months (p=0.093) and median OS 33.7 vs 28.5 months (p=0.280), respectively.
In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer relapsing after prior (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab, first-line treatment with trastuzumab or lapatinib was not associated with a significant difference in the clinical outcomes. A non-significant trend favouring the use of lapatinib was observed in patients with brain metastasis as the first site of relapse.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The potential of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation profiling in oncology is increasingly recognized for its ability to offer a comprehensive assessment of tumor biology. In this report, we explore ...the plasma methylome dynamics in patients with early breast cancer (BC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) using an agnostic genome-wide approach with cell-free DNA immunoprecipitation and sequencing (cfMeDIP-seq). Our cohort comprised seven women with triple-positive BC, assessed for cfDNA methylation changes at multiple time points during their treatment course. Genome-wide analysis revealed distinctive patterns of differential methylation in patients achieving pathological complete response (pCR), with no significant epigenomic modifications in patients with residual disease (RD). Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted dynamic variations in functional pathways associated with therapy response, including metabolism, immune response, and response to xenobiotics, with a notable reversibility post-treatment. Principal component analysis of the differentially methylated regions demonstrated a clear distinction between pCR and RD patients, indicating the potential of cfMeDIP-seq for the non-invasive assessment of therapy response. Such findings suggest that cfMeDIP-seq could complement ctDNA offering broader insights into the global modifications induced by chemotherapy. Although future research is needed to validate and expand on our findings, we offer a proof-of-principle of the potential utility of cfMeDIP-seq in the personalized management of BC.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The phase III GIM2 trial showed improved disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with adjuvant dose-dense (DD) as compared with standard-interval (SI) chemotherapy in women with ...node-positive early-stage breast cancer (BC). This exploratory analysis aimed to investigate the benefit of different schedules according to Body Mass Index (BMI) in this trial.
This analysis explored the efficacy, in terms of DFS and OS, of different chemotherapy schedule according to BMI. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, adjusted for relevant prognostic factors, were used.
Out of 2091 patients enrolled, 1925 with known baseline BMI were randomized in the DD vs SI comparison and therefore included in this analysis: 31.6% were overweight and 19.3% obese. Overweight and obesity were significantly associated with postmenopausal status, pT>2 and pN>2 tumors. After a median follow-up of 15.0 years (IQR 8.4-16.3), multivariable Cox survival models demonstrated no association of different BMI categories on DFS (adjHR 0.96, 95%CI 0.80-1.15 and adjHR 1.11, 95%CI 0.91-1.35 for overweight and obese patients, respectively compared to patients with normal BMI) or OS (adjHR 0.90 95%CI 0.71-1.14 and adjHR 1.18 95%CI 0.92-1.52 for overweight and obese patients, respectively). No significant interaction was found between BMI and treatment schedule in terms of DFS (p for interaction=0.56) or OS (p for interaction=0.19). The survival benefit of DD chemotherapy was observed irrespective of different BMI categories, with a more pronounced benefit for overweight and obese patients.
In node-positive BC patients, DD schedule should be considered the preferred schedule irrespective of BMI.
•Specific impact of BMI on the efficacy of different adjuvant chemotherapy schedules (DD or SI) for breast cancer is debated.•The benefit of DD chemotherapy in terms of DFS and OS was observed irrespective of different BMI categories.•In patients with node-positive breast cancer, DD should be the preferred schedule, irrespective of BMI.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
