Brazil is facing increasing cycles of numbers of infected people and deaths resulting from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This situation involves a series of factors, including the behavior of ...the population, that can be decisive for controlling the disease.
To determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices of the Brazilian population regarding COVID-19.
Cross-sectional survey-type study, conducted using a population sample from different Brazilian states.
A quantitative, descriptive and analytical approach was used. Sampling was done according to convenience and via snowballing. The data collection instrument was a knowledge, attitudes and practices system.
1,655 people from all over Brazil participated in the survey; 80% were living in the southern region and 70.15% were female. More than 90% had knowledge and good attitudes relating to the means of transmission, preventive care and symptoms associated with COVID-19, although their knowledge and attitudes were not fully reflected in daily practices, for which there was lower adherence (80%). Greater knowledge was correlated with older participants, larger number of children, female sex and marital status; better attitude, with female sex and complete higher education; and better practices, with greater age, larger number of children and female sex.
A large part of the population has general knowledge about COVID-19, but not all knowledge was applied in practice. Older people, females and university graduates stood out as the best informed and most committed to controlling the disease.
The tools of assessment in clinical practice are tools capable of objectively identifying important physical and psychic and spiritual changes, examining subjective phenomena and regularly monitoring ...the progression, regression or stagnation of a health-disease state. Moreover, of creating a steering mechanism for the examiner and the care team. These tools are still capable of standardizing conducts to be applied in each situation. Another important function is the epidemiological use they naturally bring. The most frequent data used comes from tools and this is because they are able to accurately extract data that often reflects a considerable public health problem.
Identifying studies that performed screening for hepatitis C and that also assessed the virus prevalence in urgency and emergency unit users.
A systematic review performed on the LILACS, MEDLINE ...databases via PubMed, SciELO and Virtual Health Library.
After careful search and analysis, 19 publications were part of the results, in compliance with the pre-defined criteria. Publication dates were concentrated between 1992 and 2018. The main journal to publish such articles was the Annals of Emergency Medicine (26.31%). Regarding the origin of publications, the following stand out: United States (63.15%), Europe (31.57%), and Asia (5.28%). Regarding prevalence, in the United States, a variation between 1.4% to 18% was observed. In Europe, in turn, the prevalence ranged from 0 to 5%. In the Asian study, the prevalence was 1.8%.
The screening performed in urgent and emergency units proved to be efficient in identifying new cases, especially when associated with the age factor, which proves to be superior to the strategy based only on risk factors. Thus, for greater effectiveness, the association of three strategies is recommended: screening location, age group, and risk factors.
RESUMO Objetivo Identificar estudos que realizaram rastreio para hepatite C e que também avaliaram a prevalência do vírus em usuários de unidades de urgência e emergência. Método Revisão sistemática ...realizada nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE via PubMed, SciELO e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Resultados Após criteriosa busca e análise, fizeram parte dos resultados 19 publicações, essas em conformidades com os critérios pré-definidos. As datas de publicação se concentraram entre 1992 e 2018. A principal revista a publicar tais artigos foi a Annals of Emergency Medicine (26,31%). Em relação à origem das publicações, destacam-se: Estados Unidos (63,15%), Europa (31,57%) e Ásia (5,28%). Em relação à prevalência, nos Estados Unidos, se observou uma variação entre 1,4% e 18%. Por sua vez, na Europa, a prevalência variou de 0 a 5%. No estudo asiático, a prevalência foi de 1,8%. Conclusão O rastreio realizado em unidades de urgência e emergência se mostrou eficiente na identificação de novos casos, especialmente quando associado ao fator idade, que demonstra ser superior à estratégia baseada apenas em fatores de risco. Assim, para maior efetividade, recomenda-se a associação das três estratégias: local do rastreio, faixa etária e fatores de risco.
RESUMEN Objetivo Identificar los estudios que realizaron pruebas de detección de hepatitis C y que también evaluaron la prevalencia del vírus en usuarios de unidades de urgencia y emergencia. Método revisión sistemática realizada en bases de datos LILACS, MEDLINE a través de PubMed, SciELO y la Biblioteca Virtual en Salud. Resultados Después de una cuidadosa búsqueda y análisis, 19 publicaciones fueron parte de los resultados, estos cumplieron con los criterios predefinidos. Las fechas de publicación se concentraron entre 1992 y 2018. La revista principal para publicar dichos artículos fue el Annals of Emergency Medicine (26,31%). En cuanto al origen de las publicaciones, destacan las siguientes: Estados Unidos (63,15%), Europa (31,57%) y Asia (5,28%). Con respecto a la prevalencia, en los Estados Unidos, se observó una variación entre 1.4% y 18%. En Europa, a su vez, la prevalencia varió de 0 a 5%. En el estudio asiático, la prevalencia fue de 1,8%. Conclusión La evaluación realizada en las unidades de urgencias y emergencias demostró ser eficiente en la identificación de nuevos casos, especialmente cuando se asocia con el factor de edad, que demuestra ser superior a la estrategia basada solo en factores de riesgo. Por lo tanto, para una mayor efectividad, se recomienda la asociación de las tres estrategias: ubicación del examen, grupo de edad y factores de riesgo.
ABSTRACT Objective Identifying studies that performed screening for hepatitis C and that also assessed the virus prevalence in urgency and emergency unit users. Method A systematic review performed on the LILACS, MEDLINE databases via PubMed, SciELO and Virtual Health Library. Results After careful search and analysis, 19 publications were part of the results, in compliance with the pre-defined criteria. Publication dates were concentrated between 1992 and 2018. The main journal to publish such articles was the Annals of Emergency Medicine (26.31%). Regarding the origin of publications, the following stand out: United States (63.15%), Europe (31.57%), and Asia (5.28%). Regarding prevalence, in the United States, a variation between 1.4% to 18% was observed. In Europe, in turn, the prevalence ranged from 0 to 5%. In the Asian study, the prevalence was 1.8%. Conclusion The screening performed in urgent and emergency units proved to be efficient in identifying new cases, especially when associated with the age factor, which proves to be superior to the strategy based only on risk factors. Thus, for greater effectiveness, the association of three strategies is recommended: screening location, age group, and risk factors.
O objetivo deste trabalho é descrever casos clínicos e séries de casos relacionados a alterações oftalmológicas em pacientes com diagnóstico de COVID-19. Foi realizada uma revisão ...narrativa/descritiva de casos clínicos e série de casos. A partir das buscas de dados com descritores pré-definidos, foram integrados na revisão, 17 estudos. Dentre os principais temas identificados, destacam-se: alterações conjuntivais, alterações retinianas e oftalmoparesias. O quadro de alterações da conjuntiva foi prevalente em relação aos demais. Essa revisão incluiu não apenas afecções oculares em adultos, mas também, em crianças e adolescentes. O estudo chama atenção para o fato de que as alterações oculares foram descritas como alteração isolada, alteração precipitante e alteração simultânea ao quadro respiratório. Conclui-se que as afecções oculares vão além de alterações conjuntivais, embora sejam essas preponderantes, havendo ainda alterações retinianas, quadro de oftalmoparesia e ainda a incomum síndrome de Miller Fisher. Novos ensaios irão poder avaliar, qual é de fato, a representatividade dos problemas oculares na cadeia epidemiológica da COVID-19.