Background Infantile hemangioma (IH) is a frequently encountered tumor with a potentially complicated course. Recently, propranolol was discovered to be an effective treatment option. Objective To ...describe the effects and side effects of propranolol treatment in 28 children with (complicated) IH. Methods A protocol for treatment of IH with propranolol was designed and implemented. Propranolol was administered to 28 children (21 girls and 7 boys, mean age at onset of treatment: 8.8 months). Results All 28 patients had a good response. In two patients, systemic corticosteroid therapy was tapered successfully after propranolol was initiated. Propranolol was also an effective treatment for hemangiomas in 4 patients older than 1 year of age. Side effects that needed intervention and/or close monitoring were not dose dependent and included symptomatic hypoglycemia (n = 2; 1 patient also taking prednisone), hypotension (n = 16, of which 1 is symptomatic), and bronchial hyperreactivity (n = 3). Restless sleep (n = 8), constipation (n = 3) and cold extremities (n = 3) were observed. Limitations Clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the incidence of side effects of propranolol treatment of IH. Conclusions Propranolol appears to be an effective treatment option for IH even in the nonproliferative phase and after the first year of life. Potentially harmful adverse effects include hypoglycemia, bronchospasm, and hypotension.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Background
Dupilumab‐associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD) is frequently reported as side effect in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the ...frequency and severity of DAOSD, ophthalmic treatment response and to learn more about the effect of dupilumab on conjunctival goblet cells (GC).
Methods
This prospective study included dupilumab‐treated AD patients between February 2020 and June 2022 from the University Medical Centre Utrecht. Patients were examined by an ophthalmologist and a dermatologist before start (baseline), and after 4 and 28 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Ophthalmological examination was assessed by the Utrecht Ophthalmic Inflammatory and Allergic disease (UTOPIA) score. DAOSD was defined as an increase in UTOPIA score of ≥3 points from baseline. To quantify conjunctival GCs and to investigate the percentage of Cytokeratin 19 (CK19)‐CD45‐Mucin 5 AC (MUC5AC)+ cells, conjunctival impression cytology samples were analysed.
Results
Ocular surface disease (OSD) was present in 91.3% (n = 63/69) patients at baseline. DAOSD was observed in 28.9% (n = 20/69) patients, in whom GC numbers remained stable and the percentage of CK19‐CD45‐MUC5AC+ cells decreased at onset of DAOSD compared with baseline. After 28 weeks of dupilumab treatment, DAOSD was seen in 14.5% (n = 10/69) patients. Of the 85.5% (n = 59/69) patients without DAOSD or with controlled DAOSD at Week 28, 40.7% (n = 24/59) patients received anti‐inflammatory ophthalmic drugs.
Conclusions
Ocular surface disease is common in moderate‐to‐severe AD patients before starting dupilumab. During treatment with dupilumab DAOSD severity improves with early ophthalmic treatment. The decrease in percentage of CK19‐CD45‐MUC5AC+ cells during dupilumab treatment suggests an impairment of the GC function due to dupilumab treatment.
We investigated the frequency and severity of DAOSD, ophthalmic treatment response, and the effect of dupilumab on conjunctival GCs in 69 moderate‐to‐severe AD patients. Many AD patients had OSD before starting dupilumab, and 59.4% started ophthalmic treatment, resulting in less severe (DA)OSD. 28.9% (n = 20/69) patients developed DAOSD, with stable but low GC numbers and reduced GC function compared to baseline. Abbreviations: AD, atopic dermatitis; DAOSD, dupilumab‐associated ocular surface disease; GC, goblet cell; MUC5AC, mucin 5AC; OSD, ocular surface disease; UTOPIA, Utrecht Ophthalmic Inflammatory and Allergic disease
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Background
At present, no real‐world studies are available on different dupilumab dosing regimens in controlled atopic dermatitis (AD). The aim of this study was to clinically evaluate a ...patient‐centered dupilumab dosing regimen in patients with controlled AD and to relate this to serum drug levels and serum biomarkers.
Methods
Ninety adult AD patients from the prospective BioDay registry were included based on their dupilumab administration interval according to a predefined patient‐centered dosing regimen. Group A (n = 30) did not fulfill the criteria for interval prolongation and continued using the standard dupilumab dosage (300 mg/2 weeks), group B (n = 30) prolonged dupilumab interval with 50% (300 mg/4 weeks), and group C (n = 30) prolonged dupilumab interval with 66%–75% (300 mg/6–8 weeks). AD severity score, patient‐reported outcomes, serum dupilumab levels, and serum biomarkers were analyzed over time.
Results
Disease severity scores did not significantly change over time during the tapering period in any of the groups. In groups B and C, the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)‐pruritus temporarily significantly increased after interval prolongation but remained low (median NRS‐pruritus≤4). Median dupilumab levels remained stable in group A (standard dosage), but significantly decreased in groups B and C (24.1 mg/L (IQR = 17.1–45.6); 12.5 mg/L (IQR = 1.7–22.3)) compared with the levels during the standard dosage (88.2 mg/L IQR = 67.1–123.0, p < .001). Disease severity biomarker levels (CCL17/CCL18) remained low in all study groups during the whole observation period.
Conclusions
This study showed that dose reduction was successful in a subgroup of patients with controlled AD by using a patient‐centered dosing regimen. These patients showed stable low disease activity and low severity biomarkers over time.
Dose reduction was successful in a subgroup of controlled AD patients by using a patient‐centered dupilumab dosing regimen. Despite significantly lower dupilumab levels, the EASI‐score and disease severity biomarkers (TARC/CCL17 and PARC/CCL18) in groups B (Q4W) and C (Q6W/Q8W) remained low and stable. These findings are the first step toward personalized dupilumab treatment for controlled AD patients in clinical practice.Abbreviations: AD, atopic dermatitis; EASI, eczema area and severity index; PARC (CCL18), pulmonary and activation‐regulated chemokine; PROMs, patient‐reported outcome measures; Q2W, every two weeks; Q4W, every four weeks; Q6W, every six weeks; Q8W, every eight weeks; TARC (CCL17), thymus and activation‐regulated chemokine
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK