Summary Background Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) gene rearrangements are oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Brigatinib (AP26113) is an investigational ALK inhibitor with ...potent preclinical activity against ALK mutants resistant to crizotinib and other ALK inhibitors. We aimed to assess brigatinib in patients with advanced malignancies, particularly ALK -rearranged NSCLC. Methods In this ongoing, single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we recruited patients from nine academic hospitals or cancer centres in the USA and Spain. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and had advanced malignancies, including ALK -rearranged NSCLC, and disease that was refractory to available therapies or for which no curative treatments existed. In the initial dose-escalation phase 1 stage of the trial, patients received oral brigatinib at total daily doses of 30–300 mg (according to a standard 3 + 3 design). The phase 1 primary endpoint was establishment of the recommended phase 2 dose. In the phase 2 expansion stage, we assessed three oral once-daily regimens: 90 mg, 180 mg, and 180 mg with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg; one patient received 90 mg twice daily. We enrolled patients in phase 2 into five cohorts: ALK inhibitor-naive ALK -rearranged NSCLC (cohort 1), crizotinib-treated ALK -rearranged NSCLC (cohort 2), EGFRT790M -positive NSCLC and resistance to one previous EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cohort 3), other cancers with abnormalities in brigatinib targets (cohort 4), and crizotinib-naive or crizotinib-treated ALK -rearranged NSCLC with active, measurable, intracranial CNS metastases (cohort 5). The phase 2 primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response. Safety and activity of brigatinib were analysed in all patients in both phases of the trial who had received at least one dose of treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01449461. Findings Between Sept 20, 2011, and July 8, 2014, we enrolled 137 patients (79 58% with ALK -rearranged NSCLC), all of whom were treated. Dose-limiting toxicities observed during dose escalation included grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase (240 mg daily) and grade 4 dyspnoea (300 mg daily). We initially chose a dose of 180 mg once daily as the recommended phase 2 dose; however, we also assessed two additional regimens (90 mg once daily and 180 mg once daily with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg) in the phase 2 stage. four (100% 95% CI 40–100) of four patients in cohort 1 had an objective response, 31 (74% 58–86) of 42 did in cohort 2, none (of one) did in cohort 3, three (17% 4–41) of 18 did in cohort 4, and five (83% 36–100) of six did in cohort 5. 51 (72% 60–82) of 71 patients with ALK -rearranged NSCLC with previous crizotinib treatment had an objective response (44 62% (50–73) had a confirmed objective response). All eight crizotinib-naive patients with ALK -rearranged NSCLC had a confirmed objective response (100% 63–100). Three (50% 95% CI 12–88) of six patients in cohort 5 had an intracranial response. The most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events across all doses were increased lipase concentration (12 9% of 137), dyspnoea (eight 6%), and hypertension (seven 5%). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (excluding neoplasm progression) reported in at least 5% of all patients were dyspnoea (ten 7%), pneumonia (nine 7%), and hypoxia (seven 5%). 16 (12%) patients died during treatment or within 31 days of the last dose of brigatinib, including eight patients who died from neoplasm progression. Interpretation Brigatinib shows promising clinical activity and has an acceptable safety profile in patients with crizotinib-treated and crizotinib-naive ALK -rearranged NSCLC. These results support its further development as a potential new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK -rearranged NSCLC. A randomised phase 2 trial in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK -rearranged NSCLC is prospectively assessing the safety and efficacy of two regimens assessed in the phase 2 portion of this trial (90 mg once daily and 180 mg once daily with a 7 day lead-in at 90 mg). Funding ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Alterations in the RAS signaling cascade are almost uniformly present in melanoma. RAS itself is only infrequently mutated
in melanoma although downstream of RAS lie BRAF on the mitogen-activated ...protein kinase pathway and PTEN on the protein kinase B/Akt pathway. These genes are often altered in melanomas; indeed, the most frequent target of mutation
in melanomas is BRAF , which is mutated in ∼60% to 70% of superficial spreading melanomas. These mutations occur in a background that is not normal,
with the CDKN2A locus also typically being mutated. We review herein the data that suggest that the distribution of the signaling mutations
is important. In general, melanomas carry a mutated NRAS , a mutated BRAF , or concurrent BRAF and PTEN mutations. These data support the hypothesis that the biochemical functions of RAS are portioned by mutations in the pathways
lying downstream. Moreover, these mutations have no apparent relationship to the patterns of alteration of CDKN2A and its downstream effectors. Thus, the data also suggest that successful exploitation of mutations in melanoma will be dependent
on understanding not only mutations and their frequency but their genetic context as well.
Ponatinib was developed to overcome resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors used to treat leukemias that are positive for the Philadelphia chromosome. In a phase 1 study, ponatinib was ...associated with dramatic antitumor effects, with pancreatitis as a dose-limiting toxicity.
The fusion protein product of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), BCR-ABL, is a constitutively active tyrosine kinase that gives rise to chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-positive ALL).
1
,
2
Three tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the BCR-ABL protein (imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib) have been approved for the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML.
3
–
5
Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is the major reason for the failure of therapy in patients with Ph-positive disease. Primary or secondary resistance to imatinib occurs in approximately 20 to 30% of patients with newly diagnosed chronic-phase CML.
3
,
6
Second-generation . . .
Gefitinib, an inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective in less than 20 percent of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. In this study, most ...tumors from patients with a response to gefitinib had a mutation in the
EGFR
gene that alters the tyrosine kinase of EGFR.
The mechanism underlying the responsiveness to gefitinib of non–small-cell lung cancer has broad implications.
Non–small-cell lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer in the United States. Chemotherapy slightly prolongs survival among patients with advanced disease, but at the cost of clinically significant adverse effects.
1
The success of the ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has demonstrated the effectiveness of targeting the critical genetic lesion that promotes proliferative signals in cancer cells.
2
Gefitinib targets the ATP cleft within the tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR),
3
which is overexpressed in 40 to 80 percent of non–small-cell lung cancers and many other epithelial cancers.
4
EGFR signaling . . .
Summary Background Ponatinib has shown potent activity against chronic myeloid leukaemia that is resistant to available treatment, although it is associated with arterial occlusion. We investigated ...whether this activity and safety profile would result in superior outcomes compared with imatinib in previously untreated patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Methods The Evaluation of Ponatinib versus Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (EPIC) study was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ponatinib, compared with imatinib, in newly diagnosed patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. Patients from 106 centres in 21 countries were randomly assigned (1:1, with stratification by Sokal score at diagnosis) using an interactive voice and web response system to receive oral ponatinib (45 mg) or imatinib (400 mg) once daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other criteria for withdrawal were met. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, within 6 months of diagnosis, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive by cytogenetic assessment, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and had not previously been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was major molecular response at 12 months. Patients who remained on study and had molecular assessments at specified timepoints were studied at those timepoints. Safety analyses included all treated patients, as per study protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01650805. Findings Between Aug 14, 2012, and Oct 9, 2013, 307 patients were randomly assigned to receive ponatinib (n=155) or imatinib (n=152). The trial was terminated early, on Oct 17, 2013, following concerns about vascular adverse events observed in patients given ponatinib in other trials. Trial termination limited assessment of the primary endpoint of major molecular response at 12 months, as only 13 patients in the imatinib group and ten patients in the ponatinib group could be assessed at this timepoint; the proportion of patients achieving a major molecular response at 12 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (eight 80% of ten patients given ponatinib and five 38% of 13 patients given imatinib; p=0·074). 11 (7%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and three (2%) of 152 patients given imatinib had arterial occlusive events (p=0·052); arterial occlusive events were designated serious in ten (6%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and in one (1%) of 152 patients given imatinib (p=0·010). The data monitoring committee criterion for risk assessment (significant difference in serious grade 3 or 4 ischaemic events between groups) was not met (five 3% of 154 vs one 1% of 152; p=0·21). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients in the ponatinib group were increased lipase (22 14% of 154 vs three 2% of 152 with imatinib), thrombocytopenia (19 12% of 154 vs ten 7% of 152 with imatinib), rash (ten 6% of 154 vs two 1% of 152 with imatinib). In the imatinib group, grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (12 8% of 152 vs five 3% of 154 with ponatinib) and thrombocytopenia (ten 7% of 152 vs 19 12% of 154 with ponatinib). Serious adverse events that occurred in three or more patients given ponatinib were pancreatitis (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=3), and thrombocytopenia (n=3). No serious adverse event occurred in three or more patients given imatinib. Interpretation The efficacy of ponatinib treatment of newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia compared with imatinib could not be assessed due to trial termination, but preliminary data suggest there might be benefit, although with more arterial occlusive events than with imatinib at the doses studied. Because the EPIC trial was terminated early, efficacy of ponatinib in this setting remains to be established. Funding ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Purpose Most crizotinib-treated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene ( ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK-positive NSCLC) eventually experience disease progression. We evaluated ...two regimens of brigatinib, an investigational next-generation ALK inhibitor, in crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC. Patients and Methods Patients were stratified by brain metastases and best response to crizotinib. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral brigatinib 90 mg once daily (arm A) or 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in at 90 mg (180 mg once daily with lead-in; arm B). Investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was the primary end point. Results Of 222 patients enrolled (arm A: n = 112, 109 treated; arm B: n = 110, 110 treated), 154 (69%) had baseline brain metastases and 164 of 222 (74%) had received prior chemotherapy. With 8.0-month median follow-up, investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 45% (97.5% CI, 34% to 56%) in arm A and 54% (97.5% CI, 43% to 65%) in arm B. Investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 15.6) and 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 to not reached) in arms A and B, respectively. Independent review committee-assessed intracranial ORR in patients with measurable brain metastases at baseline was 42% (11 of 26 patients) in arm A and 67% (12 of 18 patients) in arm B. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (arm A/B, 33%/40%), diarrhea (arm A/B, 19%/38%), headache (arm A/B, 28%/27%), and cough (arm A/B, 18%/34%), and were mainly grades 1 to 2. A subset of pulmonary adverse events with early onset (median onset: day 2) occurred in 14 of 219 treated patients (all grades, 6%; grade ≥ 3, 3%); none occurred after escalation to 180 mg in arm B. Seven of 14 patients were successfully retreated with brigatinib. Conclusion Brigatinib yielded substantial whole-body and intracranial responses as well as robust progression-free survival; 180 mg (with lead-in) showed consistently better efficacy than 90 mg, with acceptable safety.
The prognosis for women with recurrent and metastatic endometrial cancer is poor, and improved therapies are needed. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is an important target, and mTOR ...inhibitors show clinical activity in endometrial cancer.
An open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial of oral ridaforolimus compared with progestin or investigator choice chemotherapy (comparator) was undertaken in women with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer who had progressive disease following one or two lines of chemotherapy and no hormonal therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by independent radiologic review.
One hundred thirty patients were enrolled (64 received ridaforolimus and 66 received the comparator), and median age was 66 years. Treatment discontinuation as a result of adverse events was 33% with ridaforolimus versus 6% with the comparator, with common (> 10%) grade 3 toxicities being hyperglycemia, anemia, and diarrhea. Thirty-eight percent (ridaforolimus) versus 71% (comparator) of patients discontinued treatment as a result of disease progression. Median PFS at the protocol prespecified interim analysis with 58 PFS events (primary end point) was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 7.3 months) for ridaforolimus and 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 2.3 months) for the comparator (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.90; P = .008). PFS rate for ridaforolimus versus comparator was 48% versus 18% at 16 weeks and 38% versus 15% at 24 weeks. Objective response rate for ridaforolimus versus comparator was 0% versus 4% (P = .925), and stable disease was achieved in 35% versus 17% of patients (P = .021).
Oral ridaforolimus shows encouraging activity in advanced endometrial cancer but is associated with significant toxicity. Inhibition of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway may be a viable therapeutic target.
Aberrant mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is common in sarcomas and other malignancies. Drug resistance and toxicities often limit benefits of systemic chemotherapy used to treat ...metastatic sarcomas. This large randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluated the mTOR inhibitor ridaforolimus to assess maintenance of disease control in advanced sarcomas.
Patients with metastatic soft tissue or bone sarcomas who achieved objective response or stable disease with prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive ridaforolimus 40 mg or placebo once per day for 5 days every week. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), best target lesion response, safety, and tolerability.
A total of 711 patients were enrolled, and 702 received blinded study drug. Ridaforolimus treatment led to a modest, although significant, improvement in PFS per independent review compared with placebo (hazard ratio HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.85; P = .001; median PFS, 17.7 v 14.6 weeks). Ridaforolimus induced a mean 1.3% decrease in target lesion size versus a 10.3% increase with placebo (P < .001). Median OS with ridaforolimus was 90.6 weeks versus 85.3 weeks with placebo (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.12; P = .46). Adverse events (AEs) more common with ridaforolimus included stomatitis, infections, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, noninfectious pneumonitis, hyperglycemia, and rash. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were more common with ridaforolimus than placebo (64.1% v 25.6%).
Ridaforolimus delayed tumor progression to a small statistically significant degree in patients with metastatic sarcoma who experienced benefit with prior chemotherapy. Toxicities were observed with ridaforolimus, as expected with mTOR inhibition. These data provide a foundation on which to further improve control of sarcomas.
Ponatinib has potent activity against native and mutant BCR-ABL1, including BCR-ABL1T315I. The pivotal phase 2 Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial evaluated efficacy and safety of ...ponatinib at a starting dose of 45 mg once daily in 449 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) resistant/intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib, or with BCR-ABL1T315I. This analysis focuses on chronic-phase CML (CP-CML) patients (n = 270) with 56.8-month median follow-up. Among 267 evaluable patients, 60%, 40%, and 24% achieved major cytogenetic response (MCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and 4.5-log molecular response, respectively. The probability of maintaining MCyR for 5 years was 82% among responders. Dose reductions were implemented in October 2013 to decrease the risk of arterial occlusive events (AOEs); ≥90% of CP-CML patients who had achieved MCyR or MMR maintained response 40 months after elective dose reductions. Estimated 5-year overall survival was 73%. In CP-CML patients, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events were rash (47%), abdominal pain (46%), thrombocytopenia (46%), headache (43%), dry skin (42%), and constipation (41%). The cumulative incidence of AOEs in CP-CML patients increased over time to 31%, while the exposure-adjusted incidence of new AOEs (15.8 and 4.9 per 100 patient-years in years 1 and 5, respectively) did not increase over time. These final PACE results demonstrate ponatinib provides durable and clinically meaningful responses, irrespective of dose reductions, in this population of heavily pretreated CP-CML patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01207440.
•Ponatinib continued to provide deep, durable responses in heavily pretreated patients with CP-CML.•Tolerability was acceptable in this heavily pretreated population with 5 years of follow-up.
Display omitted
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Extant evidence implicates growth factor signaling in the pathogenesis of many tumor types, including cutaneous melanoma. Recently, reciprocal activating mutations of NRAS and BRAF were found in ...benign melanocytic nevi and cutaneous melanomas. We had previously reported a similar epistatic relationship between activating NRAS mutations and inactivating PTEN/MMAC1 alterations. We thus hypothesized that BRAF and PTEN/MMAC1 mutations may cooperate to promote melanoma tumorigenesis. Overall, 40 of 47 (85%) melanoma cell lines and 11 of 16 (69%) uncultured melanoma metastases had mutations in NRAS, BRAF, or PTEN/MMAC1. NRAS was exclusively mutated in nine of 47 (19%) cell lines and two of 16 (13%) metastases, whereas BRAF was solely mutated in 28 of 47 (60%) cell lines and nine of 16 (56%) metastases. In the 12 of 15 melanoma cell lines (80%) and two of two melanoma metastases with PTEN alterations, BRAF was also mutated. These findings suggest the existence of possible cooperation between BRAF activation and PTEN loss in melanoma development.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
