A random sample of middle school teachers (grades 6–9) from across the United States was surveyed about their use of writing to support students’ learning. The selection process was stratified so ...there were an equal number of English language arts, social studies, and science teachers. More than one-half of the teachers reported applying 15 or more writing to learn strategies at least once a month or more often. The most commonly used writing to learn strategies were writing short answers to questions, note taking for reading, note taking while listening, and completing worksheets. While teachers reported using a variety of writing to learn strategies, most of them indicated they received minimal or no formal preparation in college on how to use writing to learn strategies to support student learning, less than one-half of teachers directly taught students how to use the writing to learn strategies commonly assigned, and the most commonly used writing to learn strategies did not require students to think deeply about the material they were learning. We further found that teachers’ reported use of writing to learn strategies was related to their preparedness and the composition of their classroom in terms of above and below average writers, English Language Learners, and students with disabilities.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Abstract
Introduction: The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) Region 1 North (R1N) is one of seven NCI GMaP Regional “hubs”, covering the states of KY, ME, MD, NH, VA, ...VT, WV and DC. A primary goal of GMaP R1N is to facilitate the career development of the next generation of underrepresented cancer researchers by promoting and increasing applications to the NCI Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences (CURE) Program. CURE provides funded training opportunities to students at all career levels to ensure a continuum of career development opportunities in cancer health disparities (CHD) research. CURE is an underutilized option for training for underrepresented minority (URM) students interested in CHD research. GMaP R1N developed and piloted an outreach program targeted to Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) with the goal of increasing interest in CHD research and increasing awareness of CURE among HBCU students. Methods: GMaP R1N staff conducted a series of planning calls with NCI GMaP staff to develop a customizable agenda for HBCU pilot events. The group decided on the name “CURE Tour” for branding purposes for promotion and advertising. The agenda for the events included: a) presentation from an experienced CHD researcher; b) presentation from a former CURE trainee regarding his/her experiences; c) introduction to the GMaP Program; and d) knowledge quiz about presentation content (with prizes for winners). GMaP R1N staff developed relationships with staff at HBCUs for promotion of the events and logistics. Pilot “CURE Tour” events were implemented in the spring of 2019. Results: A total of 99 students attended three “CURE Tour” pilot events at Delaware State University (n=38); Coppin State University (n=44); and Morgan State University (n=17). Approximately 98% of attendees were undergraduate students with 2% graduate/doctoral students. Students (n=81) completed post-event surveys. 98% reported learning something new about CHD/CURE that they did not know previously. 92% responded that the event was engaging; 63% expressed interest in CHD research; 66% said they were interested in applying for CURE funding; 96% said they would tell a friend about the event; and 90% reported that they would participate in a future event. Conclusions: The GMaP R1N “CURE Tour” pilot was effective at reaching a primarily undergraduate population of URM students at HBCUs who are interested in CHD research careers. All “CURE Tour” attendees will be tracked in the future regarding CURE funding and CHD careers. The agenda for the “CURE Tour” events was successful in keeping students engaged and providing new information to them regarding CHD research and CURE. Based on the success of the pilot, the same methods will be followed in developing future “CURE Tour” events at other HBCUs. In addition, materials and methods can be used to replicate “CURE Tour” events in other GMaP Regions and for other URM student populations.
Citation Format: Mabinty Conteh, James Zabora, Laundette Jones, Mark Cromo, Julia Houston. The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program “CURE Tour”: Increasing awareness of the NCI Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences Program through outreach to Historically Black Colleges and Universities abstract. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2019 Sep 20-23; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B003.
Abstract
Introduction: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD) supports two national networks within its Integrated Network Program (INP): the ...Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) and the National Outreach Network (NON). CRCHD strategically engages in facilitation efforts to integrate and disseminate efforts focused on reducing cancer health disparities among the scientific community and to the underserved communities they serve. The GMaP Region 1 North (R1N) hub is one of 7 regional GMaP hubs, led by Regional Coordinating Directors (RCDs) and inclusive of 8 NON CHES across 6 cancer center sites. The R1N hub is based at the Markey Cancer Center in Lexington, Kentucky. R1N has partnered with Johns Hopkins University's Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, the University of South Carolina, and the University of Virginia Cancer Center to serve Delaware, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Virginia, and Washington, DC. RCDs and NON CHEs collaborate to enhance the capacity of regional cancer centers, academic and research partners and community partners to reduce regional cancer health disparities. Identification of preventative screening programs, or “linkages to care,” currently in place across our region and dissemination of this information to key partners was a strategy employed by R1N.
Methods: RCDs conducted a web search of all R1N member institutions and organizations and of NON CHEs cancer outreach, education activities and cancer screening initiatives. Using key search terms such as “cancer screenings,” “cancer education,” “cancer awareness,” “clinical trials” for each cancer type (breast, colon, lung, prostate, cervical and ovarian), they searched within each state and DC as well as queried social media channels (Facebook, Google+, Twitter and YouTube) of each R1N member to reveal “linkages to care” data available for each.
Results: While search engines provided results in response to our query methods described above, we noted that cancer-specific awareness months offer frequencies for NON CHE interactions through member institutions and for community members occur at least once a quarter in correlation with cancer-specific awareness months campaigns. Based on methods used, RCDs successfully developed, implemented, and disseminated the plan to identify Linkages to Care within R1N.
Conclusions: RCDs recommend that R1N member institutions and organizations dedicate web pages to Linkages to Care and adopt social media accounts for their respective public health divisions and/or organizations sponsoring cancer education, outreach, screening initiatives and clinical trials recruitment. The goal is to increase visibility of collaborative efforts among regional cancer centers, academic partners, and minority serving institutions to coordinate Linkages to Care within an NCI CRCHD INP.
Citation Format: Julia F. Houston, Heenali Fozdar, Marcela Blinka, Mark Cromo. Reducing cancer disparities through identification of linkages to care partners within GMaP Region 1 North abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr B110.
We designed and investigated the first set of instructional procedures we are aware of to teach 4th and 5th grade students how to write a persuasive essay following close reading of a source text. ...Eight boys and girls attending a diverse, low income school who were having difficulty learning to write participated in an experimental multiple-baseline design study. Self-regulated strategy development instruction for close reading of informational text and writing to persuade was situated in the writing process and included discussion, modeling, explicit instruction, scaffolding, collaboration among peers and with teachers, self-regulation of the writing process and affect, and additional components and characteristics. Outcome measures included genre elements, holistic quality, number of words written, and complexity of plans for writing. All students showed meaningful gains on the writing outcomes, with the exception of length, which varied, as predicted. Limitations and directions for future research are considered.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Abstract only
The prevalence of child obesity is increasing in many countries, highlighting the need to educate children and to make them a priority population for obesity prevention. There is ...limited information about how to best engage children in comprehensive programs that include gardening, cooking, and physical and stress‐reduction activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate engaging children in healthy diet, physical, and stress‐reduction activities to encourage behavior changes to address childhood obesity. The participants were children ages 8 to 17 years old (n=20). The 2‐week health education program included food safety, water intake, physical activity, energy intake, fast food, body mass index, eating disorders, cooking, overall health, and family meal times. Pre‐ and post‐tests were administered to measure changes in participants' knowledge, attitude, and perception about health, and their learning experience was reported. The McNemar test was used to assess changes over time. Participants' knowledge, attitude, and perception regarding nutrition education and positive body image increased after the intervention. Participants learned about healthy food choices, gained increased knowledge of fresh food markets, and realized the benefits of physical activities and gardening. Participants reported they enjoyed healthy cooking and stress‐reduction activities. Our findings demonstrate that this short term intervention could impact knowledge about nutrition information and encourage healthy lifestyle. Additional research should investigate the continued effectiveness of a comprehensive healthy‐living initiative.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
This study tested whether writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors (within the context of robust writing instruction) each made a statistically unique contribution to predicting ...fifth-grade students’ (123 girls, 104 boys) composition quality and length on a persuasive writing task involving source material, after variance due to other predictors and control variables (reading comprehension, gender, class, and school effects) were controlled. With one exception, writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors each accounted for statistically unique variance in predicting compositional quality. The exception involved writing knowledge, which did not make a unique contribution in the fall but did in the spring, when a topic knowledge measure was added. In addition, writing motivation, and strategic behaviors accounted for unique variance in composition length in the fall, and writing knowledge did so in the spring.
A core tenet of the model of domain learning is that learning is shaped by cognitive and motivational forces. In writing, these catalysts include learners’ knowledge, motivation, strategic behaviors, ...and skills. This study tested this proposition at two time points (Fall and Spring) with 179 fifth-grade students (52% were girls), examining if writing knowledge, motivation, strategic behavior, and skills each made a statistically significant and unique contribution to predicting writing quality and output on social studies persuasive writing tasks, after variance due to the other catalysts and reading comprehension were first controlled. Three of the four catalysts (writing knowledge, strategic behaviors, and skills) each accounted for statistically significant and unique variance in predicting writing quality, number of words, or both at each assessment point. These findings provided partial support for the model of domain learning as applied to writing.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Abstract
Introduction: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Center to Reduce Center Health Disparities (CRCHD) Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) initiated in 2009 ...brings together investigators, trainees, students, and community health educators to network and share information, scientific resources, and tools to promote cancer and cancer health disparities research, as well as community education outreach within and across regions. To reach their goals, CRCHD initiated 7 GMaP regional “hubs” across the United States to enhance their capacity in areas of disparities research, contribute to the next generation of researchers, and achieve measurable reductions in cancer health disparities. Each hub is led by Regional Coordinating Directors (RCDs) who facilitate connections, provide funding and training resources and “leverage the strengths of its people, programs, and resources to provide greater access to cancer information.”
Methods: The GMaP Region 1 North (R1N) hub is based at the Markey Cancer Center in Lexington, Kentucky. R1N partners with Johns Hopkins University's Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, the University of South Carolina, and the University of Virginia Cancer Center to serve Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Washington, DC, and West Virginia. The overall goal of GMaP R1N is to enhance the capacity of regional cancer centers, associated academic partners, community partners, and early-stage investigators to contribute to the reduction of cancer health disparities in the region. As part of the Continuing Umbrella of Research Experiences (CURE) Program, GMaP R1N promotes the F31, K series, and Diversity Supplement funding opportunities to potential applicants. R1N implemented pilot awards and travel scholarships for CURE-eligible candidates; developed a listserv to communicate with researchers, trainees, and potential applicants; and maintains regular contact with trainees to answer questions and encourage applications for NCI CURE Program and other grant opportunities.
Results: R1N awarded 11 pilot projects, 22 travel scholarships, helped identify mentors and 146 potential applicants for NCI CURE Program grants, and collaborated with points of contact (POC) at colleges and universities, including Historically Black Colleges and Universities to identify potential applicants for NCI CURE and other funding.
Conclusions: Methods have been successful in increasing interest in NCI Cancer health disparities training opportunities. RCDs are critical in establishing and maintaining linkages to support mentor-mentee relationships supported by available funding mechanisms; to engage institutional support for pre- and post-award activities, especially for new investigators; and for shrinking delays in the IRB review and approval process. RCDs have identified process barriers and work with regional POCs to eliminate these barriers and increase efficiencies to further the GMaP mission.
Citation Format: Marcela Blinka, Mark Cromo, Julia F. Houston, Mark Dignan, Nathan Vanderford, B. Mark Evers, Janice Bowie, Adrian Dobs, James Hebert, Tisha Felder, Roger Anderson. Results to date: Efforts to increase cancer health disparities training in Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program Region 1 North abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A068.
Abstract
Introduction: The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) is a national NCI program with the goal of increasing cancer health disparities (CHD) research. GMaP ...Region 1 North (R1N) is one of seven GMaP Regional “hubs” based at NCI-designated cancer centers (CCs) across the country, covering the states of DE, KY, ME, MD, NH, VA, VT, WV, and the District of Columbia. The National Outreach Network (NON) is a national NCI program with the goal of conducting cancer education and outreach in underserved communities to reduce CHD. NON Community Health Educators (CHEs) are based at 38 NCI-designated CCs across the country. Six NCI-designated CCs with NON CHEs fall within the GMaP R1N coverage area.
Methods: GMaP R1N staff and NON CHEs within the R1N coverage area met bimonthly to collaborate on the Screen to Save (S2S): NCI Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Outreach and Screening Initiative. The goal of S2S was to educate underserved communities on CRC and CRC screening. NON CHEs conducted the projects in diverse urban and rural communities within their CC catchment areas. Participants attended a CRC education event that provided an inflatable colon or a PowerPoint presentation and completed demographic and pre-/post-event surveys to gauge their knowledge of CRC screening. Surveys were submitted to NCI Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities program staff for review and data entry. Raw data files were returned to NON CHEs and shared with GMaP R1N staff for analysis. R1N staff provided research expertise to compare results between urban and rural S2S participants.
Results: There were a total of 328 participants in S2S (n=200 urban; n=128 rural) in the GMaP R1N/NON coverage area. The median age of urban participants was 59.5 vs. 49.0 for rural participants. 95% of urban participants and 96.1% of rural participants reported having health insurance (public or private). 92.9% of urban and 88.1% of rural participants attained at least a high school diploma or GED. 76.5% of urban and 41.4% of rural participants reported ever being screened for CRC by any method. The percent increase between pre- and post-test scores for the educational intervention was 15% for urban vs. 13.3% for rural participants, with an overall percent increase in knowledge of 14.2%.
Conclusions: The urban and rural participants were similar in educational and health insurance attainment levels. Urban residents reported much higher rates of previous CRC screening than rural residents, but this is likely due to the fact that more rural participants were younger than the recommended CRC initial screening age at the time (age 50). The S2S educational intervention was effective in increasing knowledge of CRC screening among both rural and urban participants, with similar increase between the two groups. Overall, this project demonstrated that two different yet complementary programs, GMaP and NON, can work together by utilizing program strengths to successfully implement an educational intervention conducted across a wide and diverse geographic area.
Citation Format: Mark Cromo, Rhonda Boozer-Yeary, Melinda L. Rogers, Katelyn Schifano, Jenna Schiffelbein, Katherine L. Jones, Marcela Blinka, Julia F. Houston, Betsy Grossman, Lindsay Hauser, James Zabora, Mark B. Dignan, Tracy Onega. Integrating research and outreach to increase CRC screening knowledge in underserved communities: The Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program and National Outreach Network Screen to Save partnership abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2018 Nov 2-5; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A015.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the Geographical Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) regional networks is to establish a multi-institutional framework to support and expand ...research and training of cancer health disparities researchers and trainees to reduce cancer-related health disparities. This study examined the efficacy of communication strategies within GMaP Regions 1 and 2 (R1R2) to improve uptake of communication and dissemination of jobs, training, fellowship, and collaboration opportunities over a two year period.
Background: An unequal burden of cancer among population groups exists in the United States. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) defines cancer health disparities as “adverse differences in cancer incidence, prevalence, morbidity, mortality, survivorship, and burden of cancer or related health conditions that exist among specific population groups in the United States.” Collaborative efforts across institutions within geographic regions have been limited despite previous efforts. Therefore, NCI's Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities (CRCHD) created GMaP, which consists of five hubs throughout the U.S. to increase collaborative efforts to reduce cancer health disparities intra- and inter-regionally. GMaP R1R2 includes 11 Eastern states and the District of Columbia. Members of GMaP R1R2 identified the need for an improved infrastructure to streamline program communications and facilitate collaborative efforts across a large membership group within R1R2.
Methods: A communications strategy was developed to improve efficiency and measure uptake. GMaP R1R2 launched an online platform including a Google® website that integrated social media, Google® applications, infographics and additional media channels for broader dissemination efforts. Google+ Circle®, Twitter®, and Facebook® accounts were created for R1R2. MailChimp® was selected for newsletter distribution replacing ineffective email communications to investigators of all career levels.
Results: Built-in analytics for each platform reflected uptake, which informed Program and Regional coordinator efforts. The GMaP R1R2 Google+ Circle® recruited 129 members and its Google® website averaged 1807 page views. MailChimp® includes an average of 920 subscribers. These members are grouped into 3 different listservs including GMaP R1/R2 Overall Group Email, Trainee's E-Blast, and Minority Serving Institutions (MSI) E-Blast. GMaP R1/R2 Group has an average open rate of 24.16%. The Trainee's E-blast group has an average open rate of 36.49%. The majority of these recipients viewed job and training opportunities, CRCHD Funding for Research and Training, and Funding Opportunities posted on the GMaP R1R2 website. The MSI list was created to recruit CURE trainees from minority serving institutes and had an average open rate of 20.87%. The MSI E-Blast revealed that information about CURE, Job/Training opportunities, CRCHD Funding for Research and Training, and Funding opportunities links were the most viewed (“clicks”) of the MailChimp® newsletter.
Conclusion: Improved communication and dissemination efforts were realized through the use of electronic media tools to address cancer-related health disparities by GMaP R1R2. Regional Coordinators cite that analytics reports provide valuable information for future communications and online development efforts. Additional research is needed to poll GMaP R1R2 listserv members to learn about the usefulness of this communications platform, the preferred method of social media communication among GMaP R1R2 network members and how to increase their contribution to the current platform for broader dissemination.
Citation Format: Julia F. Houston, Neha Jaggi, James R. Hebert, Ashleigh D. Gallagher, Mark Cromo, Athena Kheibari. Impact of targeted communications within a National Cancer Institute Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities Geographical Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program Regional Network. abstract. In: Proceedings of the Eighth AACR Conference on The Science of Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; Nov 13-16, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2016;25(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A16.
PDF
