Introduction R. Gregory Jenks
Paul and His Mortality,
12/2015
Book Chapter
No one knows for certain when, where, or how the Apostle Paul died. Tradition sets the year of his death either in A.D. 64 or in late A.D. 67 / early A.D. 68 and puts the place of his death in Rome. ...Tradition also says that Paul was a martyr and that he was beheaded at the bequest of Caesar Nero. Some say he was martyred after having been imprisoned in Rome with the Apostle Peter, who himself was martyred shortly thereafter. The annals of Christianity have different embedded traditions regarding Paul’s death.²
The relative obscurity of Paul’s death is
The potential for future commercialization of glyphosate-resistant wheat necessitates evaluation of agronomic merits of this technology. Experiments were established to evaluate glyphosateresistant ...wheat and weed responses to glyphosate rate, application timing, and tank mixtures. Glyphosate at 1,680 g/ha did not injure wheat. Wheat response to gly applied to one- to threeor three- to five-leaf wheat was not different from that of untreated wheat. Wheat was injured me from glyphosate plus thifensulfuron or glyphosate plus dicamba than from individual herbicides at one of six locations, but grain yield was not affected by glyphosate tank mixtures. Glyphosate application timing did not affect control of wild oat or common lambsquarters 56 d after treatment. Glyphosate when applied to one- to three-leaf wheat provided better control of wild buckwheat than later glyphosate application, whereas glyphosate applied to three- to five-leaf wheat provided the best control of green and yellow foxtail, redroot pigweed, and Canada thistle. Weed control with glyphosate tended to be better than with conventional herbicides, and wheat treated with glyphosate produced approximately 10% more grain than wheat treated with conventional herbicide tank mixes.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, NMLJ, NUK, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
The potential for future commercialization of glyphosate-resistant wheat necessitates evaluation of agronomic merits of this technology. Experiments were established to evaluate glyphosate-resistant ...wheat and weed responses to glyphosate rate, application timing, and tank mixtures. Glyphosate at 1,680 g/ha did not injure wheat. Wheat response to glyphosate applied to one- to three- or three- to five-leaf wheat was not different from that of untreated wheat. Wheat was injured more from glyphosate plus thifensulfuron or glyphosate plus dicamba than from individual herbicides at one of six locations, but grain yield was not affected by glyphosate tank mixtures. Glyphosate application timing did not affect control of wild oat or common lambsquarters 56 d after treatment. Glyphosate when applied to one- to three-leaf wheat provided better control of wild buckwheat than later glyphosate application, whereas glyphosate applied to three- to five-leaf wheat provided the best control of green and yellow foxtail, redroot pigweed, and Canada thistle. Weed control with glyphosate tended to be better than with conventional herbicides, and wheat treated with glyphosate produced approximately 10% more grain than wheat treated with conventional herbicide tank mixes. Nomenclature: Dicamba; glyphosate; thifensulfuron; Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. #3 CIRAR; green foxtail, Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVI; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARE; wild buckwheat, Polygonum convolvulus L. # POLCO; yellow foxtail, S. glauca (L.) Beauv. # SETLU; spring wheat, Triticum aestivum L. Additional index words: Genetically modified organism, GMO, herbicide injury, herbicide-resistant crops, transgenic wheat, wheat yield. Abbreviations: DAT, days after treatment; GMO, genetically modified organism.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, NMLJ, NUK, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
