The Hyperspherical Harmonics basis, without a previous symmetrization step, is used to calculate binding energies of the nuclear
A
= 6 systems using a version of the Volkov potential acting only on
...s
-wave. The aim of this work is to illustrate the use of the nonsymmetrized basis to deal with permutational-symmetry-breaking term in the Hamiltonian, in the present case the Coulomb interaction.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
The application of the hyperspherical harmonic approach to the case of non-local two-body potentials is described. Given the properties of the hyperspherical harmonic functions, there are no ...difficulties in considering the approach in both coordinate and momentum space. The binding energies and other ground-state properties of A = 3 and 4 nuclei are calculated using the CD Bonn 2000 and N3LO two-body potentials. The results are shown to be in excellent agreement with corresponding ones obtained by other accurate techniques. PUBLICATION ABSTRACT
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Abstract
The processes
d(d, p)
3
H and
d(d, n)
3
He at energies of interest for energy production and for big-bang nucleosynthesis are studied using the hyperspherical harmonic method. The ...interactions include modern two- and three-nucleon interactions, derived in chiral effective field theory. We report results for the astrophysical S-factor and the quintet suppression factor.
In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of employing the Hyperspherical Adiabatic (HA) basis set to describe continuum states of the Helium trimer molecule.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
The charge form factor of 4He has been extracted in the range 29 fm(-2) ≤ Q2 ≤ 77 fm(-2) from elastic electron scattering, detecting 4He recoil nuclei and electrons in coincidence with the high ...resolution spectrometers of the Hall A Facility of Jefferson Lab. The measurements have uncovered a second diffraction minimum for the form factor, which was predicted in the Q2 range of this experiment. The data are in qualitative agreement with theoretical calculations based on realistic interactions and accurate methods to solve the few-body problem.
Full text
Available for:
CMK, CTK, FMFMET, IJS, NUK, PNG, UM
The magnetic form factors of H 2, H 3 , and He 3 , deuteron photodisintegration cross sections at low energies, and deuteron threshold electrodisintegration cross sections at backward angles in a ...wide range of momentum transfers are calculated with the chiral two-nucleon (and three-nucleon) interactions including Δ intermediate states that have recently been constructed in configuration space. The A=3 wave functions are obtained from hyperspherical-harmonics solutions of the Schrödinger equation. The electromagnetic current includes one- and two-body terms, the latter induced by one- and two-pion exchange (OPE and TPE, respectively) mechanisms and contact interactions. The contributions associated with Δ intermediate states are only retained at the OPE level and are neglected in TPE loop (tree-level) corrections to two-body (three-body) current operators. Expressions for these currents are derived and regularized in configuration space for consistency with the interactions. The low-energy constants that enter the contact currents are determined by reproducing the magnetic moments of these few-nucleon systems. The predicted form factors and deuteron electrodisintegration cross section are in excellent agreement with experiment for momentum transfers up to 2– 3fm-1 . However, the experimental values for the deuteron photodisintegration cross section are consistently underestimated by theory, unless use is made of the Siegert form of the electric dipole transition operator. A complete analysis of the results is provided, including the clarification of the origin of the aforementioned discrepancy.
Full text
Available for:
CMK, CTK, FMFMET, IJS, NUK, PNG, UM
PDF
