Solid organ transplant recipients may be at a high risk for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and poor associated outcomes. We herein report our initial experience with solid organ transplant recipients with ...SARS‐CoV‐2 infection at two centers during the first 3 weeks of the outbreak in New York City. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, antiviral and immunosuppressive management were compared between patients with mild/moderate and severe disease (defined as ICU admission, intubation or death). Ninety patients were analyzed with a median age of 57 years. Forty‐six were kidney recipients, 17 lung, 13 liver, 9 heart, and 5 dual‐organ transplants. The most common presenting symptoms were fever (70%), cough (59%), and dyspnea (43%). Twenty‐two (24%) had mild, 41 (46%) moderate, and 27 (30%) severe disease. Among the 68 hospitalized patients, 12% required non‐rebreather and 35% required intubation. 91% received hydroxychloroquine, 66% azithromycin, 3% remdesivir, 21% tocilizumab, and 24% bolus steroids. Sixteen patients died (18% overall, 24% of hospitalized, 52% of ICU) and 37 (54%) were discharged. In this initial cohort, transplant recipients with COVID‐19 appear to have more severe outcomes, although testing limitations likely led to undercounting of mild/asymptomatic cases. As this outbreak unfolds, COVID‐19 has the potential to severely impact solid organ transplant recipients.
In this multicenter study of 90 solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID‐19 during the first three weeks of the outbreak in New York City, the authors report on the clinical presentation, laboratory abnormalities, risk factors, disease severity, and outcomes.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Abstract
Background
Patients who have undergone solid organ transplants (SOT) have an increased risk for sepsis compared with the general population. Paradoxically, studies suggest that SOT patients ...with sepsis may experience better outcomes compared with those without a SOT. However, these analyses used previous definitions of sepsis. It remains unknown whether the more recent definitions of sepsis and modern analytic approaches demonstrate a similar relationship.
Methods
Using the Weill Cornell-Critical Care Database for Advanced Research, we analyzed granular physiologic, microbiologic, comorbidity, and therapeutic data in patients with and without SOT admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). We used a survival analysis with a targeted minimum loss-based estimation, adjusting for within-group (SOT and non-SOT) potential confounders to ascertain whether the effect of sepsis, defined by sepsis-3, on 28-day mortality was modified by SOT status. We performed additional analyses on restricted populations.
Results
We analyzed 28 431 patients: 439 with SOT and sepsis, 281 with SOT without sepsis, 6793 with sepsis and without SOT, and 20 918 with neither. The most common SOT types were kidney (475) and liver (163). Despite a higher severity of illness in both sepsis groups, the adjusted sepsis-attributable effect on 28-day mortality for non-SOT patients was 4.1% (95% confidence interval CI, 3.8–4.5) and −14.4% (95% CI, −16.8 to −12) for SOT patients. The adjusted SOT effect modification was −18.5% (95% CI, −21.2 to −15.9). The adjusted sepsis-attributable effect for immunocompromised controls was −3.5% (95% CI, −4.5 to −2.6).
Conclusions
Across a large database of patients admitted to ICUs, the sepsis-associated 28-day mortality effect was significantly lower in SOT patients compared with controls.
Across a database of approximately 30 000 critically ill patients, among 720 patients with solid organ transplant (SOT) admitted to an ICU, the sepsis-attributable effect on 28-day mortality was lower in patients with SOT compared with those without SOT.
Antimicrobial resistance in nephrology Wang, Tina Z; Kodiyanplakkal, Rosy Priya L; Calfee, David P
Nature reviews. Nephrology,
08/2019, Volume:
15, Issue:
8
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among many common bacterial pathogens is increasing. The emergence and global dissemination of these antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) is fuelled by ...antibiotic selection pressure, inter-organism transmission of resistance determinants, suboptimal infection prevention practices and increasing ease and frequency of international travel, among other factors. Patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly those with end-stage renal disease who require dialysis and/or kidney transplantation, have some of the highest rates of colonization and infection with ARB worldwide. These ARB include methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. and several multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms. Antimicrobial resistance limits treatment options and increases the risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality. Several new antibiotic agents with activity against some of the most common ARB have been developed, but resistance to these agents is already emerging and highlights the dire need for new treatment options as well as consistent implementation and improvement of basic infection prevention practices. Clinicians involved in the care of patients with renal disease must be familiar with the local epidemiology of ARB, remain vigilant for the emergence of novel resistance patterns and adhere strictly to practices proven to prevent transmission of ARB and other pathogens.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Abstract
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has set clear priorities in recent years to promote inclusion, diversity, access, and equity (IDA&E) in infectious disease (ID) clinical ...practice, medical education, and research. The IDSA IDA&E Task Force was launched in 2018 to ensure implementation of these principles. The IDSA Training Program Directors Committee met in 2021 and discussed IDA&E best practices as they pertain to the education of ID fellows. Committee members sought to develop specific goals and strategies related to recruitment, clinical training, didactics, and faculty development. This article represents a presentation of ideas brought forth at the meeting in those spheres and is meant to serve as a reference document for ID training program directors seeking guidance in this area.
This paper describes ideas and best practices from the annual IDWeek Training Program Directors' meeting to promote inclusion, diversity, access, and equity (IDA&E) in infectious diseases (ID) training and is meant to serve as a reference for ID educators.
PDF
