The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a frailty-identifying metric developed using ICD-10-CM codes. While other studies have examined frailty in adult spinal deformity (ASD), the HFRS has not ...been assessed in this population. The aim of this study was to utilize the HFRS to investigate the impact of frailty on outcomes in ASD patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF).
A retrospective study was performed using the 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample database. Adults with ASD undergoing elective PSF were identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Patients were categorized into HFRS-based frailty cohorts: Low (HFRS < 5) and Intermediate-High (HFRS ≥ 5). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were assessed. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine whether HFRS independently predicted extended length of stay (LOS), non-routine discharge, and increased cost.
Of the 7500 patients identified, 4000 (53.3%) were in the Low HFRS cohort and 3500 (46.7%) were in the Intermediate-High HFRS cohort. On average, age increased progressively with increasing HFRS scores (p < 0.001). The frail cohort experienced more postoperative adverse events (p < 0.001), greater LOS (p < 0.001), accrued greater admission costs (p < 0.001), and had a higher rate of non-routine discharge (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, Intermediate-High HFRS was independently associated with extended LOS (OR: 2.58, p < 0.001) and non-routine discharge (OR: 1.63, p < 0.001), though not increased admission cost (OR: 1.01, p = 0.929).
Our study identified HFRS to be significantly associated with prolonged hospitalizations and non-routine discharge. Other factors that were found to be associated with increased healthcare resource utilization include age, Hispanic race, West hospital region, large hospital size, and increasing number of AEs.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
IMPORTANCE: Ischemic stroke is a serious complication of cardiac intervention, including surgery and percutaneous procedures. Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is an effective treatment for ischemic ...stroke and may be particularly important for cardiac intervention patients who often cannot receive intravenous thrombolysis. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in EVT for ischemic stroke during hospitalization of patients with cardiac interventions vs those without in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study involved a retrospective analysis using data for 4888 US hospitals from the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database. Participants included adults (age ≥18 years) with ischemic stroke (per codes from the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification), who were organized into study groups of hospitalized patients with cardiac interventions vs without. Individuals were excluded from the study if they had either procedure prior to admission, EVT prior to cardiac intervention, EVT more than 3 days after admission or cardiac intervention, or endocarditis. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to October 2023. EXPOSURES: Cardiac intervention during admission. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The odds of undergoing EVT by cardiac intervention status were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. Adjustments were made for stroke severity in the subgroup of patients who had a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score documented. As a secondary outcome, the odds of discharge home by EVT status after cardiac intervention were modeled. RESULTS: Among 634 407 hospitalizations, the mean (SD) age of the patients was 69.8 (14.1) years, 318 363 patients (50.2%) were male, and 316 044 (49.8%) were female. A total of 12 093 had a cardiac intervention. An NIHSS score was reported in 218 576 admissions, 216 035 (34.7%) without cardiac intervention and 2541 (21.0%) with cardiac intervention (P < .001). EVT was performed in 23 660 patients (3.8%) without cardiac intervention vs 194 (1.6%) of those with cardiac intervention (P < .001). After adjustment for potential confounders, EVT was less likely to be performed in stroke patients with cardiac intervention vs those without (adjusted odds ratio aOR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.23-0.31), which remained consistent after adjusting for NIHSS score (aOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22-0.35). Among individuals with a cardiac intervention, receiving EVT was associated with a 2-fold higher chance of discharge home (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.14-4.29). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke and cardiac intervention may be less than half as likely to receive EVT as those without cardiac intervention. Given the known benefit of EVT, there is a need to better understand the reasons for lower rates of EVT in this patient population.
The endothelial glycocalyx, a glycosaminoglycan layer located on the apical surface of vascular endothelial cells, has been shown to be important for several endothelial functions. Previous studies ...have documented that the glycocalyx is highly abundant in the mouse common carotid region, where the endothelium is exposed to laminar shear stress, and it is resistant to atherosclerosis. In contrast, the glycocalyx is scarce or absent in the mouse internal carotid sinus region, an area exposed to nonlaminar shear stress and highly susceptible to atherosclerosis. On the basis of these observations, we hypothesized that the expression of components of the endothelial glycocalyx is differentially regulated by distinct hemodynamic environments. To test this hypothesis, human endothelial cells were exposed to shear stress waveforms characteristic of atherosclerosis-resistant or atherosclerosis-susceptible regions of the human carotid, and the expression of several components of the glycocalyx was assessed. These experiments revealed that expression of several components of the endothelial glycocalyx is differentially regulated by distinct shear stress waveforms. Interestingly, we found that heparan sulfate expression is increased and evenly distributed on the apical surface of endothelial cells exposed to the atheroprotective waveform and is irregularly present in cells exposed to the atheroprone waveform. Furthermore, expression of a heparan sulfate proteoglycan, syndecan-1, is also differentially regulated by the two waveforms, and its suppression mutes the atheroprotective flow-induced cell surface expression of heparan sulfate. Collectively, these data link distinct hemodynamic environments to the differential expression of critical components of the endothelial glycocalyx.
The aim of this study was to assess the predictive ability of Metastatic Spinal Tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI) and the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) on adverse outcomes, compared with the known ...Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).
A retrospective cohort study was performed using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2011 to 2019. All adult patients undergoing various procedures for extradural spinal metastases were identified. Patients were stratified into frail and nonfrail cohorts based on CCI, mFI-5, and MSTFI scores. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of prolonged length of stay, nonroutine discharge, adverse events, and unplanned readmission.
Of the 1613 patients included in this study, 21.4% had a CCI >0, 56.6% had an mFI-5 >0, and 76.7% of patients had an MSTFI >0. On multivariate analysis, all 3 indices were found to be predictive of nonroutine discharge (CCI: adjusted odds ratio aOR, 1.41 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.37 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.5) and adverse events (CCI: aOR, 1.53 vs. mFI-5: aOR, 1.23 vs. MSTFI: aOR, 1.43). High CCI (adjusted relative risk, 1.67) and MSTFI (adjusted relative risk, 1.14), but not mFI-5, were also associated with a prolonged length of stay, whereas MSTFI was found to be the only significant predictor of unplanned readmission (aOR, 1.22).
Our study suggests that MSTFI frailty index may be more sensitive than both CCI and mFI-5 in identifying adverse outcomes after spine surgery for metastases.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Observational cohort study.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between safety-net hospital (SNH) status and hospital length of stay (LOS), cost, and discharge disposition in ...patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal column tumors.
SNHs serve a high proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patients. However, few studies have assessed the effects of SNH status on outcomes after surgery for metastatic spinal column tumors.
This study was performed using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. All adult patients undergoing metastatic spinal column tumor surgeries, identified using ICD-10-CM coding, were stratified by SNH status, defined as hospitals in the top quartile of Medicaid/uninsured coverage burden. Hospital characteristics, demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, and outcomes were assessed. Multivariable analyses identified independent predictors of prolonged LOS (>75th percentile of cohort), nonroutine discharge, and increased cost (>75th percentile of cohort).
Of the 11,505 study patients, 24.0% (n = 2760) were treated at an SNH. Patients treated at SNHs were more likely to be Black-identifying, male, and lower income quartile. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the non-SNH (N-SNH) cohort experienced any postoperative complication SNH: 965 (35.0%) vs . N-SNH: 3535 (40.4%), P = 0.021. SNH patients had significantly longer LOS (SNH: 12.3 ± 11.3 d vs . N-SNH: 10.1 ± 9.5 d, P < 0.001), yet mean total costs (SNH: $58,804 ± 39,088 vs . N-SNH: $54,569 ± 36,781, P = 0.055) and nonroutine discharge rates SNH: 1330 (48.2%) vs . N-SNH: 4230 (48.4%), P = 0.715) were similar. On multivariable analysis, SNH status was significantly associated with extended LOS odds ratio (OR): 1.41, P = 0.009, but not nonroutine discharge disposition (OR: 0.97, P = 0.773) or increased cost (OR: 0.93, P = 0.655).
Our study suggests that SNHs and N-SNHs provide largely similar care for patients undergoing metastatic spinal tumor surgeries. Patients treated at SNHs may have an increased risk of prolonged hospitalizations, but comorbidities and complications likely contribute greater to adverse outcomes than SNH status alone.
3.
While the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) has been clearly established, difficult vascular ...access may make the intervention impossible or unduly prolonged. In this study, the authors evaluated safety as well as radiographic and functional outcomes in stroke patients treated with MT via direct carotid puncture (DCP) for prohibitive vascular access.
The authors retrospectively studied patients from their prospective AIS-LVO database who underwent attempted MT between 2015 and 2018. Patients with prohibitive vascular access were divided into two groups: 1) aborted MT (abMT) after failed transfemoral access and 2) attempted MT via DCP. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months. Associations with outcome were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression.
Of 352 consecutive patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO who underwent attempted MT, 37 patients (10.5%) were deemed to have prohibitive vascular access (mean age ± SD 82 ± 11 years, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale NIHSS score 17 ± 5, with females accounting for 75% of the patients). There were 20 patients in the DCP group and 17 in the abMT group. The two groups were well matched for the known predictors of clinical outcome: age, sex, and admission NIHSS score. Direct carotid access was successfully obtained in 19 of 20 patients. Successful reperfusion (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 2b or 3) was achieved in 16 (84%) of 19 patients in the DCP group. Carotid access complications included an inability to catheterize the carotid artery in 1 patient, neck hematomas in 4 patients, non-flow-limiting common carotid artery (CCA) dissections in 2 patients, and a delayed, fatal carotid blowout in 1 patient. The neck hematomas and non-flow-limiting CCA dissections did not require any subsequent interventions and remained clinically silent. Compared with the abMT group, patients in the DCP group had smaller infarct volumes (11 vs 48 ml, p = 0.04), a greater reduction in NIHSS score (-4 vs +2.9, p = 0.03), and better functional outcome (shift analysis for 3-month modified Rankin Scale score: adjusted OR 5.2, 95% CI 1.02-24.5; p = 0.048).
DCP for emergency MT in patients with anterior circulation AIS-LVO and prohibitive vascular access is safe and effective and is associated with higher recanalization rates, smaller infarct volumes, and improved functional outcome compared with patients with abMT after failed transfemoral access. DCP should be considered in this patient population.
Frailty is a prevalent state associated with several aging-related traits and conditions. The relationship between frailty and stroke remains understudied. Here we aim to investigate whether the ...hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) is associated with the risk of stroke and determine whether a significant association between genetically determined frailty and stroke exists.
Observational study using data from
research program and Mendelian Randomization analyses.
Participants from
with available electronic health records were selected for analysis.
began national enrollment in 2018 and is expected to continue for at least 10 years.
is recruiting members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented in research. All participants provided informed consent at the time of enrollment, and the date of consent was recorded for each participant. Incident stroke was defined as stroke event happening on or after the date of consent to the
study HFRS was measured with a 3-year look-back period before the date of consent for stroke risk. The HFRS was stratified into 4 categories: no-frailty (HFRS=0), low (HFRS ≥1 and <5), intermediate (≥5 and <15), and high (HFRS ≥15). Last, we implemented Mendelian Randomization analyses to evaluate whether genetically determined frailty is associated with stroke risk.
Two hundred fifty-three thousand two hundred twenty-six participants were at risk of stroke. In multivariable analyses, frailty status was significantly associated with risk of any (ischemic or hemorrhagic) stroke following a dose-response way: not-frail versus low HFRS (HR, 4.9 CI, 3.5-6.8;
<0.001), not-frail versus intermediate HFRS (HR, 11.4 CI, 8.3-15.7;
<0.001) and not-frail versus high HFRS (HR, 42.8 CI, 31.2-58.6;
<0.001). We found similar associations when evaluating ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke separately (
value for all comparisons <0.05). Mendelian Randomization confirmed this association by indicating that genetically determined frailty was independently associated with risk of any stroke (OR, 1.45 95% CI, 1.15-1.84;
=0.002).
Frailty, based on the HFRS was associated with higher risk of any stroke. Mendelian Randomization analyses confirmed this association providing evidence to support a causal relationship.
PDF
