Are lipid interactions with membrane proteins best described in terms of the physical properties of the lipid bilayer or in terms of direct molecular interactions between particular lipid molecules ...and particular sites on a protein? A molecular interpretation is more challenging because it requires detailed knowledge of the 3D structure of a membrane protein, but recent studies have suggested that a molecular interpretation is necessary. Here, the idea is explored that lipid molecules modify the ways that transmembrane α-helices pack into bundles, by penetrating between the helices and by binding into clefts between the helices, and that these effects on helix packing will modulate the activity of a membrane protein.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
A docking procedure is described that allows the transmembrane surface of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) to be swept rapidly for potential binding sites for cholesterol at the bilayer interfaces ...on the two sides of the membrane. The procedure matches 89% of the cholesterols resolved in published GPCR crystal structures, when cholesterols likely to be crystal packing artifacts are excluded. Docking poses are shown to form distinct clusters on the protein surface, the clusters corresponding to “greasy hollows” between protein ridges. Docking poses depend on the angle of tilt of the GPCR in the surrounding lipid bilayer. It is suggested that thermal motion could alter the optimal binding pose for a cholesterol molecule, with the range of binding poses within a cluster providing a guide to the range of thermal motions likely for a cholesterol within a binding site.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are members of a large family of ion channels located in membranes rich in cholesterol, some of whose functions are affected by the cholesterol content of ...the membrane. Here, cholesterol binding to TRPs is studied using a docking procedure that allows the transmembrane surface of a TRP to be swept rapidly for potential binding sites at the interfaces on the two sides of the membrane. Cholesterol docking poses determined in this way match 89% of the cholesterol hemisuccinate molecules in published TRP structures when cholesterol hemisuccinate molecules unlikely to represent typical bound cholesterols are excluded. TRPs are tetrameric, with large clefts at the interfaces between subunits; cholesterol poses are located in hollows, largely within these clefts. Comparison of cholesterol poses with phospholipid binding sites suggests that binding of cholesterol to a TRP need not result in displacement of phospholipid molecules from the TRP surface.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors in the brain are located in the outer membranes of brain cells where the concentration of cholesterol is high. Of the 25 available high-resolution ...structures available for GABAA receptors, none were determined in the presence of cholesterol, but four include resolved molecules of cholesterol hemisuccinate (CHS). Here, a molecular docking procedure is used to sweep the transmembrane (TM) surfaces of the receptors for cholesterol binding sites. Cholesterol docking poses determined in this way match 89% of the resolved CHS when CHS molecules deemed unlikely to represent typical bound cholesterols are excluded. The receptors are pentameric, and their TM surfaces consist of a set of five facets, each including pairs of TM helices from two adjacent subunits. Each facet contains hydrophobic hollows running from one side of the membrane to the other, within which are six potential binding sites for cholesterol, three on each side of the membrane. High-resolution structures of GABAA receptors with bound neurosteroids show that neurosteroids bind in these cholesterol binding sites, so the binding of neurosteroids and cholesterol will be competitive.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The activities of integral membrane proteins are often affected by the structures of the lipid molecules that surround them in the membrane. One important parameter is the hydrophobic thickness of ...the lipid bilayer, defined by the lengths of the lipid fatty acyl chains. Membrane proteins are not rigid entities, and deform to ensure good hydrophobic matching to the surrounding lipid bilayer. The structure of the lipid headgroup region is likely to be important in defining the structures of those parts of a membrane protein that are located in the lipid headgroup region. A number of examples are given where the conformation of the headgroup-embedded region of a membrane protein changes during the reaction cycle of the protein; activities of such proteins might be expected to be particularly sensitive to lipid headgroup structure. Differences in hydrogen bonding potential and hydration between the headgroups of phosphatidycholines and phosphatidylethanolamines could be important factors in determining the effects of these lipids on protein activities, as well as any effects related to the tendency of the phosphatidylethanolamines to form a curved, hexagonal H
II phase. Effects of lipid structure on protein aggregation and helix–helix interactions are also discussed, as well as the effects of charged lipids on ion concentrations close to the surface of the bilayer. Interpretations of lipid effects in terms of changes in protein volume, lipid free volume, and curvature frustration are also described. Finally, the role of non-annular, or ‘co-factor’ lipids, tightly bound to membrane proteins, is described.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Lipid-protein interactions Lee, Anthony G
Biochemical Society transactions,
06/2011, Volume:
39, Issue:
3
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Intrinsic membrane proteins are solvated by a shell of lipid molecules interacting with the membrane-penetrating surface of the protein; these lipid molecules are referred to as annular lipids. Lipid ...molecules are also found bound between transmembrane α-helices; these are referred to as non-annular lipids. Annular lipid binding constants depend on fatty acyl chain length, but the dependence is less than expected from models based on distortion of the lipid bilayer alone. This suggests that hydrophobic matching between a membrane protein and the surrounding lipid bilayer involves some distortion of the transmembrane α-helical bundle found in most membrane proteins, explaining the importance of bilayer thickness for membrane protein function. Annular lipid binding constants also depend on the structure of the polar headgroup region of the lipid, and hotspots for binding anionic lipids have been detected on some membrane proteins; binding of anionic lipid molecules to these hotspots can be functionally important. Binding of anionic lipids to non-annular sites on membrane proteins such as the potassium channel KcsA can also be important for function. It is argued that the packing preferences of the membrane-spanning α-helices in a membrane protein result in a structure that matches nicely with that of the surrounding lipid bilayer, so that lipid and protein can meet without either having to change very much.
The outer membranes of animal cells contain high concentrations of cholesterol, of which a small proportion is located deep within the hydrophobic core of the membrane. An automated docking procedure ...is described that allows the characterization of binding sites for these deep cholesterol molecules on the membrane-spanning surfaces of membrane proteins and in protein cavities or pores, driven by hydrogen bond formation. A database of this class of predicted binding site is described, covering 397 high-resolution structures. The database includes sites on the transmembrane surfaces of many G-protein coupled receptors; within the fenestrations of two-pore K+ channels and ATP-gated P2X3 channels; in the central cavities of a number of transporters, including Glut1, Glut5, and P-glycoprotein; and in deep clefts in mitochondrial complexes III and IV.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Inwardly rectifying, voltage-gated, two-pore domain, and related K+ channels are located in eukaryotic membranes rich in cholesterol. Here, molecular docking is used to detect specific binding sites ...(“hot spots”) for cholesterol on K+ channels with characteristics that match those of known cholesterol binding sites. The transmembrane surfaces of all available high-resolution structures for K+ channels were swept for potential binding sites. Cholesterol poses were found to be located largely in hollows between protein ridges. A comparison between cholesterol poses and resolved phospholipids suggests that not all cholesterol molecules binding to the transmembrane surface of a K+ channel will result in displacement of a phospholipid molecule from the surface. Competition between cholesterol binding and binding of anionic phospholipids essential for activity could explain some of the effects of cholesterol on channel function.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Scap and Insig, two proteins embedded in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), regulate the synthesis of cholesterol in animal cells by forming a dimer in the presence of high ...concentrations of cholesterol. Cryo-electron microscopic structures for the Scap–Insig dimer show a sterol-binding site at the dimer interface, but none of the structures include cholesterol itself. Here, a molecular docking approach developed to characterise cholesterol binding to the transmembrane (TM) regions of membrane proteins is used to characterise cholesterol binding to sites on the TM surface of the dimer and to the interfacial binding site. Binding of cholesterol is also observed at sites on the extra-membranous luminal domains of Scap, but the properties of these sites suggest that they will be unoccupied in vivo. Comparing the structure of Scap in the dimer with that predicted by AlphaFold for monomeric Scap suggests that dimer formation could result in relocation of TM helix 7 of Scap and of the loop between TM6 and 7, and that this could be the key change on Scap that signals that there is a high concentration of cholesterol in the ER.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Inwardly rectifying, voltage-gated, two-pore domain, and related K
channels are located in eukaryotic membranes rich in cholesterol. Here, molecular docking is used to detect specific binding sites ...("hot spots") for cholesterol on K
channels with characteristics that match those of known cholesterol binding sites. The transmembrane surfaces of all available high-resolution structures for K
channels were swept for potential binding sites. Cholesterol poses were found to be located largely in hollows between protein ridges. A comparison between cholesterol poses and resolved phospholipids suggests that not all cholesterol molecules binding to the transmembrane surface of a K
channel will result in displacement of a phospholipid molecule from the surface. Competition between cholesterol binding and binding of anionic phospholipids essential for activity could explain some of the effects of cholesterol on channel function.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
