Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to PCI with everolimus-eluting stents or CABG. At 2 years, the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel ...revascularization occurred more frequently in the PCI group.
Randomized trials and observational studies have shown that the rates of most adverse clinical outcomes among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease are lower after coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) than after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
1
–
7
Current clinical guidelines thus recommend CABG as the preferred revascularization strategy, particularly in patients with complex coronary lesions and without excessive operative risk.
8
,
9
However, previous trials may have been limited by their use of first-generation drug-eluting stents. Although these stents reduced the rate of restenosis, their use was associated with a relatively high rate of stent-related thrombotic events.
10
Results from the Synergy between . . .
There are conflicting data regarding the benefit of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over angiography-guided PCI. Since the last meta-analysis was ...published, several new studies have been reported. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical impact of IVUS-guided PCI with drug-eluting stent compared with conventional angiography-guided PCI. This meta-analysis included 26,503 patients from 3 randomized and 14 observational studies; 12,499 patients underwent IVUS-guided PCI and 14,004 underwent angiography-guided PCI. Main outcome measures were total mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). IVUS-guided PCI was significantly associated with more stents, longer stents, and larger stents. Regarding clinical outcomes, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with a significantly lower risk of TLR (odds ratio OR 0.81, 95% confidence interval CI 0.66 to 1.00, p = 0.046). In addition, the risk of death (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79, p <0.001), MI (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.75, p <0.001), and stent thrombosis (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.75, p <0.001) were also decreased. In conclusion, our meta-analysis demonstrated that IVUS-guided PCI was associated with lower risk of death, MI, TLR, and stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis were assigned to either CABG or PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents. At 1 year, with a wide prespecified noninferiority margin, PCI was ...found to be noninferior to CABG.
Anumber of registry reports, as well as a substudy from a large, randomized trial, have indicated that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be an acceptable alternative to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) in some patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.
1
–
11
Recent clinical guidelines have accordingly stated that elective PCI can be considered for patients who have unprotected left main coronary artery disease, although they suggest that the aggregated evidence favors CABG.
12
,
13
Whether the outcomes after PCI are similar to those after CABG remains uncertain, however, owing to the lack of large, randomized clinical trials. Registry results have . . .
Two trials enrolled a total of 2701 patients who had undergone implantation of a drug-eluting coronary stent and had been receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 12 months. They were ...randomly assigned to either continuation or discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy. At 19.2 months after randomization, the rate of myocardial infarction or death from cardiac causes did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Patients who had undergone implantation of a drug-eluting coronary stent and had been receiving dual antiplatelet therapy for at least 12 months were randomly assigned to either continuation or discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy. At 19.2 months after randomization, the rate of myocardial infarction or death from cardiac causes did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Several pivotal clinical trials have shown that the use of drug-eluting coronary stents is associated with significant reductions in the risks of restenosis and need for target-lesion revascularization, as compared with use of bare-metal coronary stents.
1
On the basis of the results of these trials, drug-eluting stents have been widely used for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice.
2
However, some longer-term studies have shown that drug-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, are associated with increased rates of late stent thrombosis, death, or myocardial infarction.
3
,
4
It has been proposed that the occurrence of late clinical events may be . . .
Abstract There is limited data comparing effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with ...non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS). We compared the long-term outcomes of the two revascularization strategies in 1,246 patients presented with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Data were pooled from the BEST, PRECOMBAT, and SYNTAX trials. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two study groups. During the median follow-up of 60 months, the rate of the primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (hazard ratio HR: 0.74; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.56−0.98; P=0.036). This difference was mainly attributed to a significant reduction in the rate of myocardial infarction (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.31−0.82, P=0.006). The superiority of CABG over PCI was consistent across the major subgroups. The individual risks of death from any causes or stroke were not different between the two groups. In contrast, the rate of repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41−0.75, P < 0.001). In this study, among patients with NSTE-ACS for left main or multivessel CAD, CABG significantly reduces the risk of death from any causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared to PCI with DES.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Objectives The goal of this study was to identify clinical and lesion-specific local factors affecting visual-functional mismatch. Background Although lesion severity determined by coronary ...angiography has not been well correlated with physiological significance, the mechanism of the discordance remains poorly understood. Methods The authors assessed quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and fractional flow reserve (FFR) in a prospective cohort of 1,000 patients with 1,129 coronary lesions. Three-dimensional computational simulation studies were performed. Results Lesions with angiographic diameter stenosis (DS) ≥50% and FFR >0.80 (“mismatches”) were seen in 57% of non–left main lesions and in 35% of the left main lesions, respectively (p = 0.032). Conversely, among the lesions with DS <50% and FFR <0.80 (“reverse mismatches”) 16% were found in the non–left main lesions and 40% in the left main lesions (p < 0.001). The independent predictors for mismatch were advanced age, non–left anterior descending artery location, absence of plaque rupture, short lesion length, large minimal lumen area, smaller plaque burden, and greater minimal lumen diameter. Conversely, reverse mismatch was independently associated with younger age, left anterior descending artery location, the presence of plaque rupture, a smaller minimal lumen area, and larger plaque burden. In a computational simulation study, FFR was influenced by DS, lesion length, different lesion shape, plaque eccentricity, surface roughness, and various shapes of plaque rupture. Conclusions There were high frequencies of visual-functional mismatch between angiography and FFR. The discrepancy was related to the clinical and lesion-specific factors frequently unrecognizable by angiography, thus suggesting that coronary angiography cannot accurately predict FFR. (Natural History of FFR-Guided Deferred Coronary Lesions IRIS FFR-DEFER; NCT01366404 )
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The risks and benefits of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy remain unclear.
This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison trial was conducted in 24 clinical centers in Korea. In ...total, 5045 patients who received drug-eluting stents and were free of major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding for at least 12 months after stent placement were enrolled between July 2007 and July 2011. Patients were randomized to receive aspirin alone (n=2514) or clopidogrel plus aspirin (n=2531). The primary end point was a composite of death resulting from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke 24 months after randomization. At 24 months, the primary end point occurred in 57 aspirin-alone group patients (2.4%) and 61 dual-therapy group patients (2.6%; hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.35; P=0.75). The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of the individual risks of death resulting from any cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or stroke. Major bleeding occurred in 24 (1.1%) and 34 (1.4%) of the aspirin-alone group and dual-therapy group patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-1.20; P=0.20).
Among patients who were on 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy without complications, an additional 24 months of dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin alone did not reduce the risk of the composite end point of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke.
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01186146.
Comparative outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease were previously reported. However, data on ...very long-term (>10 years) outcomes are limited.
The authors compare 10-year outcomes after PCI and CABG for LMCA disease.
In this observational study of the MAIN-COMPARE (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization) registry, the authors evaluated 2,240 patients with unprotected LMCA disease who underwent PCI (n = 1,102) or underwent CABG (n = 1,138) between January 2000 and June 2006. Adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke; and target-vessel revascularization) were compared with the use of propensity scores and inverse-probability-weighting adjustment. The follow-up was extended to at least 10 years of all patients (median 12.0 years).
In the overall cohort, there was no significant difference in adjusted risks of death and the composite outcome between the groups up to 10 years. The risk of target-vessel revascularization was significantly higher in the PCI group. In the cohort comparing drug-eluting stents and concurrent CABG, the 2 study groups did not differ significantly in the risks of death and the composite outcome at 5 years. However, after 5 years, drug-eluting stents were associated with higher risks of death (hazard ratio: 1.35; 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.81) and the composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.46; 95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.94) compared with CABG.
In patients with significant LMCA disease, as compared with CABG, PCI showed similar rates of death and serious composite outcomes, but a higher rate of target-vessel revascularization at 10 years. However, CABG showed lower mortality and serious composite outcome rates compared with PCI with drug-eluting stents after 5 years. (Revascularization for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Angioplasty versus Surgical Revascularization MAIN-COMPARE; NCT02791412)
Display omitted
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Abstract Objectives This study sought to evaluate the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) minimal lumen area (MLA) for functionally significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis using fractional ...flow reserve (FFR) as the standard. Background The evaluation of significant LMCA stenosis remains challenging. Methods We identified 112 patients with isolated ostial and shaft intermediate LMCA stenosis (angiographic diameter stenosis of 30% to 80%) who underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. Results The FFR was ≤0.80 in 66 LMCA lesions (59%); these exhibited smaller reference vessels, smaller minimal lumen diameter, greater diameter of stenosis, longer lesion length, smaller MLA, larger plaque burden, and more frequent plaque rupture. The independent factors of an FFR of ≤0.80 were plaque rupture (odds ratio OR: 4.47; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.35 to 14.8; p = 0.014); body mass index (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.41; p = 0.05), age (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.00; p = 0.031), and IVUS MLA (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.56; p < 0.001). The optimal IVUS MLA cutoff value for an FFR of ≤0.80 was 4.5 mm2 (77% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 84% positive predictive value, 75% negative predictive value, area under the curve: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.96; p < 0.001) overall and 4.1 to 4.5 mm2 in various subgroups. Adjustment for the body surface area, body mass index, and left ventricular mass did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the IVUS MLA. Conclusions In patients with isolated ostial and shaft intermediate LMCA stenosis, an IVUS-derived MLA of ≤4.5 mm2 is a useful index of an FFR of ≤0.80.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
BACKGROUND:Procedural results for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary vessels with chronic total occlusion (CTO) have improved in recent years, and PCI strategies have moved toward ...more complete revascularization with more liberal use of CTO-PCI. However, evidence evaluating CTO-PCI is limited to observational studies and small clinical trials.
METHODS:In this open-label, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, PCI-eligible patients were assigned to receive either 1 of 2 strategiesPCI or no PCI for the qualifying de novo CTO lesion with the option for PCI of obstructive non-CTO lesions at the discretion of the operator. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any revascularization. Health-related quality of life was assessed at baseline and at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Because of slow recruitment, the trial was stopped before completion of the 1284 planned enrollments.
RESULTS:Between March 2010 and September 2016, 834 patients were randomly assigned to the CTO-PCI (n=417) or no CTO-PCI (n=398) strategy. Among the patients assigned to the no CTO-PCI strategy, 78 (19.6%) crossed over to receive staged CTO-PCI within 3 days of randomization. The overall CTO-PCI success rate was 90.6%. Serious nonfatal complications associated with CTO-PCI occurred in 3 patients (1 stroke, 1 cardiac tamponade, and 1 patient with recurrent episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia induced by intracoronary thrombus). Approximately half of the patients in each group underwent PCI for an average of 1.3 non-CTO lesions, resulting in a comparable residual SYNTAX score (Synergy Between PCI With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery; 3.7±5.4 versus 4.0±5.9, P=0.42) confined to non-CTO vessels. During a median follow-up of 4.0 years (interquartile range, 2.4 to 5.1 years), there was no significant difference between the CTO-PCI and the no CTO-PCI strategies in the incidence of the primary end point (22.3% versus 22.4%, hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.37; P=0.86). Both CTO-PCI and no CTO-PCI strategy were associated with significant improvements but without between-group differences in disease-specific health status that was sustained through 36 months.
CONCLUSIONS:CTO-PCI was feasible with high success rates. There was no difference in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events with CTO-PCI versus no CTO-PCI, but the study was limited by low power for clinical end points and high crossover rates between groups.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URLhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT01078051.
PDF
