The mechanism by which G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) translate extracellular signals into cellular changes initially was envisioned as a simple linear model: activation of the receptor by ...agonist binding leads to dissociation of the heterotrimeric GTP-binding G protein into its α and βγ subunits, both of which can activate or inhibit various downstream effector molecules. The plethora of recently described multidomain scaffolding proteins and accessory/chaperone molecules that interact with GPCR, including GPCR themselves as homo- or heterodimers, provides for diverse molecular mechanisms for ligand recognition, signalling specificity, and receptor trafficking. This review will summarize the recently described GPCR-interacting proteins and their individual functional roles, as understood. Implicit in the search for the functional relevance of these interactions is the expectation that enhancement or disruption of target cell-specific events could serve as highly selective therapeutic opportunities.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
2.
Membrane trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors TAN, Christopher M; BRADY, Ashley E; NICKOLS, Hilary Highfield ...
Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology,
01/2004, Volume:
44, Issue:
1
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate diverse physiological and behavioral signaling pathways by virtue of changes in receptor activation and inactivation states. Functional changes in ...receptor properties include dynamic interactions with regulatory molecules and trafficking to various cellular compartments at various stages of the life cycle of a GPCR. This review focuses on trafficking of GPCRs to the cell surface, stabilization there, and agonist-regulated turnover. GPCR interactions with a variety of newly revealed partners also are reviewed with the intention of provoking further analysis of the relevance of these interactions in GPCR trafficking, signaling, or both. The disease consequences of mislocalization of GPCRs also are described.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
The noradrenergic system is involved in the regulation of many physiological and psychological processes, including the modulation of mood. The alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(2)-ARs) modulate ...norepinephrine release, as well as the release of serotonin and other neurotransmitters, and are therefore potential targets for antidepressant and anxiolytic drug development. The current studies were undertaken to examine the role of the alpha(2A) subtype of alpha(2)-AR in mouse behavioral models of depression and anxiety. We have observed that the genetic knock-out of the alpha(2A)-AR makes mice less active in a modified version of Porsolt's forced swim test and insensitive to the antidepressant effects of the tricyclic drug imipramine in this paradigm. Furthermore, alpha(2A)-AR knock-out mice appear more anxious than wild-type C57 Bl/6 mice in the rearing and light-dark models of anxiety after injection stress. These findings suggest that the alpha(2A)-AR may play a protective role in some forms of depression and anxiety and that the antidepressant effects of imipramine may be mediated by the alpha(2A)-AR.
Arrestin regulates almost all G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated signaling and trafficking. We report that the multidomain protein, spinophilin, antagonizes these multiple arrestin functions. ...Through blocking G protein receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) association with$receptor-G\beta \gamma$complexes, spinophilin reduces arrestin-stabilized receptor phosphorylation, receptor endocytosis, and the acceleration of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity following endocytosis. Spinophilin knockout mice were more sensitive than wild-type mice to sedation elicited by stimulation of α2adrenergic receptors, whereas arrestin 3 knockout mice were more resistant, indicating that the signal-promoting, rather than the signal-terminating, roles of arrestin are more important for certain response pathways. The reciprocal interactions of GPCRs with spinophilin and arrestin represent a regulatory mechanism for fine-tuning complex receptor-orchestrated cell signaling and responses.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, NMLJ, NUK, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
Many hormones and neurotransmitters attenuate cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation in intact cells by virtue of their ability to inhibit adenylate cyclase activity via the GTP-binding protein denoted as ...Gi. Nonetheless, a number of physiological findings suggest that attenuation of cAMP production is not sufficient to serve as the only signal for eliciting the diverse physiological effects provoked by these various receptor populations. Additional biochemical and electrophysiological changes are known to occur after occupancy of receptors linked to inhibition of adenylate cyclase, including acceleration of Na+/H+ exchange, activation of K+ conductances, and inhibition of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. This review summarizes the current understanding of how these receptors are coupled to their multiple potential effector mechanisms and offers some speculation about the possible interplay between the biochemical and electrophysiological sequels of receptor occupancy. It is hoped that future studies will establish which constellation of possible signaling mechanisms actually brings about changes in metabolic, secretory, or contractile events in different target cells.
This review briefly summarizes the development of the receptor concept, the identification of receptors based first on biological
response data and subsequently on radioligand binding properties, and ...the biological and physiological understandings that
these approaches have made possible. The development of receptor characterization began with receptors that ultimately were
discovered to mediate response by coupling to G-binding proteins, also known as G proteinâcoupled receptors (GPCRs). Consequently,
many if not all of the examples in this overview will describe studies characterizing GPCRs in general, and adrenergic receptors
in particular. The purpose of this review, however, is not a detailed chronological account of a huge literature, but rather
an overview of the fundamental questions posed and answered by these studies.
Agonist-elicited receptor sequestration is strikingly different for the alpha(2A)- versus alpha(2B)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2)-AR) subtypes; the alpha(2B)-AR undergoes rapid and extensive ...disappearance from the HEK 293 cell surface, whereas the alpha(2A)-AR does not (Daunt, D. A., Hurt, C., Hein, L., Kallio, J., Feng, F., and Kobilka, B. K. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 51, 711-720; Eason, M. G., and Liggett, S. B. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25473-25479). Since recent reports suggest that endocytosis is required for some G protein-coupled receptors to stimulate the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade (Daaka, Y., Luttrell, L. M., Ahn, S., Della Rocca, G. J., Ferguson, S. S., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 685-688; Luttrell, L. M., Daaka, Y., Della Rocca, G. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 31648-31656; Ignatova, E. G., Belcheva, M. M., Bohn, L. M., Neuman, M. C., and Coscia, C. J. (1999) J. Neurosci. 19, 56-63), we evaluated the differential ability of these two subtypes to activate MAP kinase. We observed no correlation between subtype-dependent agonist-elicited receptor redistribution and receptor activation of the MAP kinase cascade. Furthermore, incubation of cells with K(+)-depleted medium eliminated alpha(2B)-AR internalization but did not eliminate MAP kinase activation, suggesting that receptor internalization is not a general prerequisite for activation of the MAP kinase cascade via G(i)-coupled receptors. We also noted that neither dominant negative dynamin (K44A) nor concanavalin A treatment dramatically altered MAP kinase activation or receptor redistribution, indicating that these experimental tools do not universally block G protein-coupled receptor internalization.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a superfamily of proteins, characterized by seven transmembrane α-helices, that signal through interactions with a family of heterotrimeric GTP-binding ...proteins, referred to as G proteins. The broad range of physiological functions associated with GPCRs indicates that a better understanding of these receptors and their regulation can provide a solid foundation for novel pharmacological interventions in a variety of disease states.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
In recent years, many reports have appeared describing distinct heterogeneity of proteins that heretofore were considered to be a single species or type. The division of proteins into different ...classes or subtypes is aided by pharmacological tools such as selective ligands, functional measurements such as those examining kinetic or regulatory differences, and molecular biological approaches that have identified distinct genes coding for similar yet distinguishable gene products. Currently, much effort is directed toward understanding the significance of these sometimes subtle differences in terms of functional consequences for the cells in which they exist. Although most reports to date involve hormone and neurotransmitter receptor subtypes, it is also possible that other cell surface molecules such as ion transporters exist as multiple subtypes. In this paper we review the current evidence that Na(+)-H+ exchange activity is mediated by different Na(+)-H+ exchanger subtypes. Although subtypes have not been identified with certainty, we can predict certain distinguishing characteristics that these putative subtypes may have that may be of value in correlating predicted gene products obtained from cDNA cloning with previously characterized Na(+)-H+ exchangers.
G-protein-coupled receptors demonstrate differing trafficking itineraries in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK II) cells. The α2A adrenergic receptor (α2AAR) is directly delivered to the ...basolateral subdomain; the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AdoR) is apically enriched in its targeting; and the α2BAR subtype is randomly delivered to both domains but selectively retained basolaterally (Keefer, J. R., and Limbird, L. E. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11340–11347; Saunders, C., Keefer, J. R., Kennedy, A. P., Wells, J. N., and Limbird, L. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 995–1002; Wozniak, M., and Limbird, L. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 5017–5024). The present studies explore the role of the polarized cytoskeleton in localization of G-protein-coupled receptors in MDCK II cells. Nocodazole or colchicine, which disrupt microtubules, did not perturb lateral localization of α2AR subtypes but led to a relocalization the A1AdoR to the basolateral surface, revealed by immunocytochemical and metabolic labeling strategies. Conversely, the apical component of the random delivery of α2BAR was not affected by these agents, suggesting microtubule-dependent and -independent apical targeting mechanisms for G-protein-coupled receptors in polarized cells. Apparent rerouting of the apically targeted A1AdoR was selective for microtubule-disrupting agents, since cytochalasin D, which disrupts actin polymerization, did not alter A1AdoR or α2BAR localization or targeting. These data suggest that multiple apical targeting mechanisms exist for G-protein-coupled receptors and that microtubule-disrupting agents serve as tools to probe their different trafficking mechanisms.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
