HER2-positive breast cancer Loibl, Sibylle, Prof; Gianni, Luca, MD
The Lancet (British edition),
06/2017, Volume:
389, Issue:
10087
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Summary Anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer has changed the natural biology of this disease. This Series article reviews the main achievements so far in the treatment of both ...metastatic and early HER2-positive breast cancer. The success of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer is especially acknowledged, as pertuzumab has been approved on the basis of a higher proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response with pertuzumab and trastuzumab than with trastuzumab alone in a neoadjuvant study. Event-free survival after the confirmatory adjuvant trial completed recruitment was numerically better with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab than with trastuzumab alone. With survival rates of almost 5 years in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer and 75% of patients achieving a pathological complete response, new treatments in the past decade have clearly improved the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite these achievements, however, the persisting high toll of deaths resulting from HER2-positive breast cancer calls for continued, intensive clinical research of newer therapies and combinations.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
PIK3CA
mutations occur in approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. A PI3K inhibitor, alpelisib, combined with fulvestrant led to a median progression-free survival ...of 11 months, as compared with 5.7 months with placebo plus fulvestrant. Hyperglycemia, rash, and diarrhea were more common with alpelisib.
In women with hormone-receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after endocrine therapy, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was associated with progression-free survival of more than 9 ...months, as compared with less than 4 months with fulvestrant alone.
Approximately 80% of breast cancers express estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, or both. Endocrine therapies are the mainstay of treatment for these hormone-receptor–positive cancers, substantially reducing the relapse rate after presentation with early-stage cancer.
1
Despite advances in endocrine therapy, many women have a relapse during or after completing adjuvant therapy. The care of these women remains a considerable clinical challenge. Single-agent treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen has shown limited clinical benefit.
2
,
3
The selective estrogen-receptor degrader fulvestrant has modest activity in this population of patients,
4
,
5
and the development of effective therapies that can reverse resistance to endocrine therapy . . .
Summary Oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer is the most common subtype of breast cancer. Endocrine therapies that target the dependence of this subtype on the oestrogen receptor have ...substantial activity, yet the development of resistance to therapy is inevitable in advanced cancer. Major progress has been made in identifying the drivers of oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer and the mechanisms of resistance to endocrine therapy. This progress has translated into major advances in the treatment of advanced breast cancer, with several targeted therapies that enhance the efficacy of endocrine therapy; inhibitors of mTOR and inhibitors of the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 substantially improve progression-free survival. A new wave of targeted therapies is being developed, including inhibitors of PI3K, AKT, and HER2, and a new generation of oestrogen-receptor degraders. Considerable challenges remain in patient selection, deciding on the most appropriate order in which to administer therapies, and establishing whether cross-resistance occurs between therapies.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer were treated with standard chemotherapy or the anti–Trop-2 antibody–drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan. Patients receiving the drug conjugate ...had significantly longer progression-free and overall survival as well as more frequent myelotoxic effects and diarrhea.
CDK4/6 inhibitors have an established role in the treatment of hormone receptor positive HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. All studies conducted in metastatic breast cancer showed a benefit in ...delaying progression when added to standard endocrine therapy, regardless of therapy line, pretreatment, menopausal status, site of metastasis, CDK4/6 inhibitor used and associated endocrine therapy. A benefit in overall survival has also been demonstrated. In early breast cancer, only the MonarchE study has shown an improved invasive disease-free survival with abemaciclib taken for 2 years, whereas the Penelope-B did not meet the primary endpoint and the PALLAS study was terminated early for futility. Studies conducted in the neoadjuvant setting might help to explain the discordant results.
•CDK4/6 inhibitors increase PFS in advanced breast cancer in all subgroups.•2-years abemaciclib added to endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival in high-risk breast cancer.•Palbociclib did not improve invasive disease-free survival in early breast cancer.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The addition of palbociclib to fulvestrant prolonged overall survival among women with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had sensitivity to previous hormonal ...therapy. In the entire trial group, survival differences were not significant.
To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy ...for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.
A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations.
Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.
This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells (CTC) detected in patients with operable or locally advanced breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) ...within the clinical trial GeparQuattro.
Data on CTCs enumerated with the CellSearch system were available for 213 and 207 patients before and after NT, respectively. Associations of CTCs with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by nonparametric Kaplan-Meier estimates and parametric Cox regression.
After a median follow-up of 67.1 months, the detection of ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL and ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL before NT was associated with reduced DFS (
= 0.031 and
< 0.0001, respectively) and OS (
= 0.0057 and
< 0.0001, respectively), whereas CTCs detected after NT did not correlate with DFS or OS. In parametric univariate and multivariate Cox models, ≥1 CTC/7.5 mL, ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL, and absolute CTC numbers before NT revealed to be independent prognostic parameters of DFS and OS. CTC-negative patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) exhibited the best prognosis, whereas those with CTCs and less tumor response were at high risk of tumor relapse. In HER2 (ERBB2)-positive and triple-negative patients, ≥2 CTCs/7.5 mL detected before NT also were significantly associated with worse DFS and OS.
Detection of CTCs before NT is an independent prognostic factor of impaired clinical outcome, and combined with pCR, it could be helpful to stratify breast cancer patients for therapeutic interventions.
.
The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway coordinates the identification, signaling, and repair of DNA damage caused by endogenous or exogenous factors and regulates cell-cycle progression with DNA ...repair to minimize DNA damage being permanently passed through cell division. Severe DNA damage that cannot be repaired may trigger apoptosis; as such, the DDR pathway is of crucial importance as a cancer target. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is the best-known element of the DDR, and several PARP inhibitors have been licensed. However, there are approximately 450 proteins involved in DDR, and a number of these other targets are being investigated in the laboratory and clinic. We review the most recent evidence for the clinical effect of PARP inhibition in breast and ovarian cancer and explore expansion into the first-line setting and into other tumor types. We critique the evidence for patient selection techniques and summarize what is known about mechanisms of PARP inhibitor resistance. We then discuss what is known about the preclinical rationale for targeting other members of the DDR pathway and the associated tumor cell genetics that may confer sensitivity to these agents. Examples include DNA damage sensors (MLH1), damage signaling molecules (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated; ataxia-telangiectasia mutated-related and Rad3-related; CHK1/2; DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit; WEE1; CDC7), or effector proteins for repair (POLQ also referred to as POLθ, RAD51, poly ADP-ribose glycohydrolase). Early-phase clinical trials targeting some of these molecules, either as a single agent or in combination, are discussed. Finally, we outline the challenges that must be addressed to maximize the therapeutic opportunity that targeting DDR provides.
PDF
