Background The treatment of children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) related to SARS-CoV-2 infection involves immunomodulatory therapies such as IVIG and steroids. ...Anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor inhibitor, has also been used, but its effectiveness is not established yet. As optimal regimens for MIS-C remain unknown, we aimed to assess the effect of anakinra in reducing hospital stay in patients with MIS-C. Methods We included children admitted from May 2020 to May 2021 diagnosed with MIS-C based on CDC criteria. The exposure of interest was anakinra use at any point during admission. The anakinra exposed group and the anakinra unexposed group were propensity score matched based on demographic and clinical severity indicators at initial presentation. Our primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were duration of vasoactive support, vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), level of respiratory support, time to fever resolution, reduction of CRP levels, and length of ICU stay. We used Wilcoxon rank sum, t-test, Chi square and Fisher's exact tests. Results Of 138 children diagnosed with MIS-C, 79% had moderate or severe illness and 41% received anakinra. Of those, 31 patients who received anakinra were propensity score matched to 31 who did not. The length of stay in the hospital but not in the ICU was longer in the anakinra group. There were no differences in median duration of vasoactive support, fever resolution, CRP reduction, or VIS. Conclusions In patients with moderate to severe MIS-C, use of anakinra was associated with longer duration of hospital stay. Keywords: MIS-C, COVID-19, Children, Anakinra
Full text
Available for:
IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used successfully to support adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-related cardiac or respiratory failure ...refractory to conventional therapies. Comprehensive reports of children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2-related ECMO support for conditions, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) and acute COVID-19, are needed.
Case series of patients from the Overcoming COVID-19 public health surveillance registry.
Sixty-three hospitals in 32 U.S. states reporting to the registry between March 15, 2020, and December 31, 2021.
Patients less than 21 years admitted to the ICU meeting Centers for Disease Control criteria for MIS-C or acute COVID-19.
None.
The final cohort included 2,733 patients with MIS-C ( n = 1,530; 37 2.4% requiring ECMO) or acute COVID-19 ( n = 1,203; 71 5.9% requiring ECMO). ECMO patients in both groups were older than those without ECMO support (MIS-C median 15.4 vs 9.9 yr; acute COVID-19 median 15.3 vs 13.6 yr). The body mass index percentile was similar in the MIS-C ECMO versus no ECMO groups (89.9 vs 85.8; p = 0.22) but higher in the COVID-19 ECMO versus no ECMO groups (98.3 vs 96.5; p = 0.03). Patients on ECMO with MIS-C versus COVID-19 were supported more often with venoarterial ECMO (92% vs 41%) for primary cardiac indications (87% vs 23%), had ECMO initiated earlier (median 1 vs 5 d from hospitalization), shorter ECMO courses (median 3.9 vs 14 d), shorter hospital length of stay (median 20 vs 52 d), lower in-hospital mortality (27% vs 37%), and less major morbidity at discharge in survivors (new tracheostomy, oxygen or mechanical ventilation need or neurologic deficit; 0% vs 11%, 0% vs 20%, and 8% vs 15%, respectively). Most patients with MIS-C requiring ECMO support (87%) were admitted during the pre-Delta (variant B.1.617.2) period, while most patients with acute COVID-19 requiring ECMO support (70%) were admitted during the Delta variant period.
ECMO support for SARS-CoV-2-related critical illness was uncommon, but type, initiation, and duration of ECMO use in MIS-C and acute COVID-19 were markedly different. Like pre-pandemic pediatric ECMO cohorts, most patients survived to hospital discharge.
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) consensus criteria were designed for maximal sensitivity and therefore capture patients with acute COVID-19 pneumonia.
We performed unsupervised ...clustering on data from 1,526 patients (684 labeled MIS-C by clinicians) <21 years old hospitalized with COVID-19-related illness admitted between 15 March 2020 and 31 December 2020. We compared prevalence of assigned MIS-C labels and clinical features among clusters, followed by recursive feature elimination to identify characteristics of potentially misclassified MIS-C-labeled patients.
Of 94 clinical features tested, 46 were retained for clustering. Cluster 1 patients (N = 498; 92% labeled MIS-C) were mostly previously healthy (71%), with mean age 7·2 ± 0·4 years, predominant cardiovascular (77%) and/or mucocutaneous (82%) involvement, high inflammatory biomarkers, and mostly SARS-CoV-2 PCR negative (60%). Cluster 2 patients (N = 445; 27% labeled MIS-C) frequently had pre-existing conditions (79%, with 39% respiratory), were similarly 7·4 ± 2·1 years old, and commonly had chest radiograph infiltrates (79%) and positive PCR testing (90%). Cluster 3 patients (N = 583; 19% labeled MIS-C) were younger (2·8 ± 2·0 y), PCR positive (86%), with less inflammation. Radiographic findings of pulmonary infiltrates and positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR accurately distinguished cluster 2 MIS-C labeled patients from cluster 1 patients.
Using a data driven, unsupervised approach, we identified features that cluster patients into a group with high likelihood of having MIS-C. Other features identified a cluster of patients more likely to have acute severe COVID-19 pulmonary disease, and patients in this cluster labeled by clinicians as MIS-C may be misclassified. These data driven phenotypes may help refine the diagnosis of MIS-C.
This work was funded by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (75D30120C07725) and National Institutes of Health (K12HD047349 and R21HD095228).
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
This report describes the epidemiology and clinical course of patients younger than 21 years of age from 26 states who had multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Many were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at ...least 1 to 2 weeks before syndrome onset. The median age of the patients was 8.3 years, and 73% were previously healthy.
In this study evaluating BNT162b2, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for Covid-19 in the delta-predominant period among adolescents 12 to 18 years of age was more than 90%; during the ...omicron period, vaccine effectiveness was 40% against hospitalization and 79% against critical illness. Vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization was 68% among children 5 to 11 years of age.
Investigators used a case–control, test-negative design to assess the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine in adolescents for the prevention of Covid-19–related hospitalization, ICU admission, or ...receipt of life support. Among 445 case patients and 777 controls, of the 180 patients admitted to an ICU, only 2 had been fully vaccinated; all 7 deaths occurred in unvaccinated patients.
IMPORTANCE: Refinement of criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) may inform efforts to improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes ...of children and adolescents with MIS-C vs those with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). SETTING, DESIGN, AND PARTICIPANTS: Case series of 1116 patients aged younger than 21 years hospitalized between March 15 and October 31, 2020, at 66 US hospitals in 31 states. Final date of follow-up was January 5, 2021. Patients with MIS-C had fever, inflammation, multisystem involvement, and positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or antibody test results or recent exposure with no alternate diagnosis. Patients with COVID-19 had positive RT-PCR test results and severe organ system involvement. EXPOSURE: SARS-CoV-2. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Presenting symptoms, organ system complications, laboratory biomarkers, interventions, and clinical outcomes. Multivariable regression was used to compute adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of factors associated with MIS-C vs COVID-19. RESULTS: Of 1116 patients (median age, 9.7 years; 45% female), 539 (48%) were diagnosed with MIS-C and 577 (52%) with COVID-19. Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to be 6 to 12 years old (40.8% vs 19.4%; absolute risk difference RD, 21.4% 95% CI, 16.1%-26.7%; aRR, 1.51 95% CI, 1.33-1.72 vs 0-5 years) and non-Hispanic Black (32.3% vs 21.5%; RD, 10.8% 95% CI, 5.6%-16.0%; aRR, 1.43 95% CI, 1.17-1.76 vs White). Compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with MIS-C were more likely to have cardiorespiratory involvement (56.0% vs 8.8%; RD, 47.2% 95% CI, 42.4%-52.0%; aRR, 2.99 95% CI, 2.55-3.50 vs respiratory involvement), cardiovascular without respiratory involvement (10.6% vs 2.9%; RD, 7.7% 95% CI, 4.7%-10.6%; aRR, 2.49 95% CI, 2.05-3.02 vs respiratory involvement), and mucocutaneous without cardiorespiratory involvement (7.1% vs 2.3%; RD, 4.8% 95% CI, 2.3%-7.3%; aRR, 2.29 95% CI, 1.84-2.85 vs respiratory involvement). Patients with MIS-C had higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (median, 6.4 vs 2.7, P < .001), higher C-reactive protein level (median, 152 mg/L vs 33 mg/L; P < .001), and lower platelet count (<150 ×103 cells/μL 212/523 {41%} vs 84/486 {17%}, P < .001). A total of 398 patients (73.8%) with MIS-C and 253 (43.8%) with COVID-19 were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 10 (1.9%) with MIS-C and 8 (1.4%) with COVID-19 died during hospitalization. Among patients with MIS-C with reduced left ventricular systolic function (172/503, 34.2%) and coronary artery aneurysm (57/424, 13.4%), an estimated 91.0% (95% CI, 86.0%-94.7%) and 79.1% (95% CI, 67.1%-89.1%), respectively, normalized within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This case series of patients with MIS-C and with COVID-19 identified patterns of clinical presentation and organ system involvement. These patterns may help differentiate between MIS-C and COVID-19.
PDF
