Objectives This study sought to evaluate whether prasugrel may serve as an alternative to clopidogrel in patients with triple therapy. Background Approximately 10% of patients who receive dual ...antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention have an indication for oral anticoagulation and are thus treated with triple therapy. The standard adenosine diphosphate receptor blocker in this setting is clopidogrel. Data regarding prasugrel as part of triple therapy are not available. Methods We analyzed a consecutive series of 377 patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation and had an indication for oral anticoagulation between February 2009 and December 2011 and were treated with a 6-month regimen of aspirin and oral anticoagulation with either prasugrel or clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was a composite of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding at 6 months. The secondary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or definite stent thrombosis. Results Twenty-one patients (5.6%) received prasugrel instead of clopidogrel. These patients had a higher-risk profile at baseline, and the majority had high platelet reactivity to clopidogrel. TIMI major and minor bleeding occurred significantly more often in the prasugrel compared with the clopidogrel group (6 28.6%) vs. 24 6.7%; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR): 4.6, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.9 to 11.4, p < 0.001; adjusted HR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 9.1, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference regarding the combined ischemic secondary endpoint (2 9.5% vs. 25 7.0%; unadjusted HR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.3 to 6.1, p = 0.61). Conclusions These findings suggest that substitution of prasugrel for clopidogrel in patients needing triple therapy increases the risk of bleeding. However, specific randomized trials are needed to define the role of newer adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in this setting.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Objectives The aim of this prospective trial was to assess whether platelet reactivity to clopidogrel assessed with multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) correlates with the risk of early ...drug-eluting stent thrombosis (ST). Background Studies using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) have shown that insufficient suppression of platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) after clopidogrel treatment is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, LTA is time- and labor-intensive and inconvenient for the routine. A point-of-care assay with similar predictive power would be of great value. Methods Between February 2007 and April 2008, a total of 1,608 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease and planned drug-eluting stent implantation were enrolled. Before PCI, all patients received 600 mg clopidogrel. Blood was obtained directly before PCI. The ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed in whole blood with MEA on a Multiplate analyzer (Dynabyte, Munich, Germany). The primary end point was definite ST at 30 days. Results The upper quintile of patients according to MEA measurements (n = 323) was defined as clopidogrel low responders. Compared with normal responders (n = 1,285), low responders had a significantly higher risk of definite ST within 30 days (2.2% vs. 0.2%; odds ratio OR: 9.4; 95% confidence interval CI: 3.1 to 28.4; p < 0.0001). Mortality rates were 1.2% in low versus 0.4% in normal responders (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 0.9 to 11.1; p = 0.07). The composite of death or ST was higher in low versus normal responders (3.1% vs. 0.6%; OR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.2 to 11.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions Low response to clopidogrel assessed with MEA is significantly associated with an increased risk of ST. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the ability of MEA to guide antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Numerous patients are treated with the MitraClip, although they do not fulfill the stringent inclusion criteria of the Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study (EVEREST) trials. The outcome of ...those patients is not well known. Therefore, we compared the long-term outcome after MitraClip treatment between patients who matched (group 1) and did not match (group 2) the EVEREST criteria. One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients were treated from September 2009 to July 2012: 59 patients (44%) in group 1 versus 75 patients (56%) in group 2. Investigated end points were acute procedural success (for group 1 vs 2: 97% vs 95%; p = 0.694), all-cause mortality (28% vs 27%; p = 0.656), reintervention (RI) rate (11% vs 37%; p = 0.010), and improvement in mitral regurgitation (MR) (−1.3 ± 1 vs −1.5 ± 1, p = 0.221) and in New York Heart Association functional class (−0.7 ± 1 vs −0.9 ± 0.8, p = 0.253) during the follow-up of 33 months (27.9 to 38.3). The morphologic extent of a flail leaflet was an independent predictor for RI. In conclusion, although the overall outcome was comparable between both groups, recurrent symptomatic MR with need for RI was higher in group 2, mainly because of complex valve pathologies: especially flail width >15 mm and gap ≥10 mm. Improvements in the interventional strategy are warranted for reducing the need for RI in patients with primary MR.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Objectives The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of no-reflow phenomenon on 5-year mortality among patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated ...by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This impact was also assessed in relation to infarct size. Background The impact of no-reflow on long-term mortality in patients with STEMI has been insufficiently studied. Methods This study included 1,406 patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI. No-reflow was diagnosed using angiographic criteria. Infarct size was measured with single-photon emission computed tomography imaging 7 to 14 days after the acute event. The primary outcome was 5-year mortality. Results The no-reflow phenomenon was diagnosed in 410 patients (29%). Infarct size was 15.0% (6.0% to 29.0%) of the left ventricle in the no-reflow group versus 8.0% (2.0% to 21.0%) of the left ventricle in the reflow group (p < 0.001). There were 132 deaths during follow-up. Of them, 59 deaths occurred among patients with no-reflow and 73 deaths occurred among patients with reflow (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year mortality 18.2% and 9.5%, respectively; odds ratio: 2.02; 95% confidence interval: 1.44 to 2.82; p < 0.001). The Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for infarct size among other variables identified the no-reflow phenomenon as an independent correlate of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.66; 95% confidence interval: 1.17 to 2.36; p = 0.004). Conclusions In patients with STEMI treated by primary PCI, no-reflow phenomenon is a strong predictor of 5-year mortality. No-reflow phenomenon after PCI provides prognostic information that is independent of and beyond that provided by infarct size.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is increasingly applied for aortic stenosis in elderly patients with impaired mobility and reduced quality of life. These patients ...may particularly benefit from post-interventional exercise programs, but no randomized study has evaluated the safety and efficacy of exercise in this population. Methods In a prospective pilot study, 30 patients after TAVI (mean age 81 ± 6 yrs., 44% female, 83 ± 34 days post-intervention) were randomly allocated 1:1 to eight weeks of supervised combined endurance and resistance training (TG) or to usual care (UC). The formal primary efficacy endpoint was between-group difference in change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak) assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing; secondary endpoints included muscular strength, 6-min walk distance, and quality of life (KCCQ and SF12 questionnaires). Safety was assessed by documenting training-related adverse events, prosthesis and renal function. Results Significant changes in favor of TG were observed for VO2 peak (group difference 3.7 ml/min/kg (95%-CI 1.1–6.3, P = .007)), muscular strength (bench press 6 kg (3–10, P = .002), rowing 7(3–11, P < .001), pulldown 9(4–14, P = .001), shoulder press 5(1–8, P = .008), leg press 17(6–28, P = .005)), components of quality of life (KCCQ physical limitation 19.2(4.1–34.2, P = .015), symptom burden 12.3(0.5–24.0, P = .041), clinical summary 12.4(3.4–21.4, P = .009)), but not for other questionnaire subscales and 6-min walk distance (15 m (−23–53, P = .428)). Three dropouts unrelated to exercise occurred (TG = 2, UC = 1); prosthesis and renal function were not affected by the exercise intervention. Conclusions In patients after TAVI, exercise training appears safe and highly effective with respect to improvements in exercise capacity, muscular strength and quality of life. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01935297
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Objectives The aim of this trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery ...(uLMCA) disease. Background Both PES and SES have reduced the risk of restenosis, particularly in high-risk patient and lesion subsets. However, their comparative performance in uLMCA lesions is not known. Methods In this randomized study, 607 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for uLMCA were enrolled: 302 were assigned to receive a PES (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) and 305 assigned to receive a SES (Cypher, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey). The primary end point was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. The secondary end point was angiographic restenosis on the basis of the LMCA area analysis at follow-up angiography. Results At 1 year the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or TLR was 13.6% in the PES and 15.8% in the SES group (relative risk RR: 0.85, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.56 to 1.29, p = 0.44). One patient in the PES group (0.3%) and 2 patients in the SES group (0.7%) experienced definite stent thrombosis (p = 0.57). Mortality at 2 years was 10.7% in the PES and 8.7% in the SES group (RR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.95, p = 0.64). Angiographic restenosis was 16.0% with PES and 19.4% with SES (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.19, p = 0.30). Conclusions Implantation of either PES or SES in uLMCA lesions is safe and effective; both of these drug-eluting stents provide comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes. (Drug-Eluting-Stents for Unprotected Left Main Stem Disease ISAR-LEFT-MAIN; NCT00133237 )
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
A Meta-Analysis of 17 Randomized Trials of a Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Based Strategy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Albert Schömig, Julinda Mehilli, Antoinette de Waha, ...Melchior Seyfarth, Jürgen Pache, Adnan Kastrati We identified 17 randomized trials comparing a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based invasive treatment strategy with medical treatment in 7,513 patients with symptoms or signs of myocardial ischemia and no acute coronary syndrome. Of these patients, 3,675 were assigned to the PCI group and 3,838 to the medical treatment group. Allocation to the PCI group was associated with 20% reduction in the odds ratio (OR) of all-cause death (OR: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.99). These findings suggest that a PCI-based invasive strategy may improve long-term survival compared with a medical treatment-only strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Objectives This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) and the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery ...(uLMCA) disease. Background The second-generation ZES and EES have reduced the risk of restenosis in large patient cohorts. However, their comparative performance in uLMCA lesions is not known. Methods In this study, patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for uLMCA lesions were randomly assigned to receive either a ZES (n = 324) or an EES (n = 326). The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary endpoints were definite or probable stent thrombosis at 1 year and angiographic restenosis based on analysis of the left main coronary artery area at follow-up angiography. Results At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of the primary endpoint was 17.5% in the ZES group and 14.3% in the EES group (relative risk: 1.26; 95% confidence interval CI: 0.85 to 1.85; p = 0.25). Three patients in the ZES group (0.9%) and 2 patients in the EES group (0.6%) experienced definite or probable stent thrombosis (p > 0.99). All-cause mortality at 1 year was equal in the 2 groups (5.6%; relative risk: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.93; p = 0.98). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 21.5% of patients in the ZES group and 16.8% in the EES group (relative risk: 1.28; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.92; p = 0.24). Conclusions Within the statistical limitations of the present study, treatment of uLMCA lesions with a ZES or an EES provided comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes at 1-year follow-up. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Coronary Left Main Lesions ISAR-LEFT MAIN-2; NCT00598637 )
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The association between uric acid and cardiovascular disease is incompletely understood. In particular, the prognostic value of uric acid in patients with acute coronary syndromes who undergo ...percutaneous coronary intervention has not been studied. This study included 5,124 patients with acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: 1,629 with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 1,332 with acute non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 2,163 with unstable angina. The primary end point was 1-year mortality. Patients were divided into quartiles according to uric acid level as follows: quartile 1, 1.3 to <5.3 mg/dl; quartile 2, 5.3 to <6.3 mg/dl; quartile 3, 6.3 to <7.5 mg/dl; and quartile 4, 7.5 to 18.4 mg/dl. There were 450 deaths during follow-up: 80 deaths in quartile 1, 77deaths in quartile 2, 72 deaths in quartile 3, and 221 deaths in quartile 4 of uric acid (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year mortality 6.4%, 6.2%, 5.6%, and 17.4%, respectively; unadjusted hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 2.54 to 3.67, p <0.001 for fourth vs first quartile of uric acid). After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, and inflammatory status, the association between uric acid and mortality remained significant, with a 12% increase in the adjusted risk for 1-year mortality for every 1 mg/dl increase in the uric acid level. Uric acid improved the discriminatory power of the predictive model regarding 1-year mortality (absolute integrated discrimination improvement 0.008, p = 0.005). In conclusion, elevated levels of uric acid are an independent predictor of 1-year mortality across the whole spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
Objectives In the ISAR-TEST-2 (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Three Limus-Eluting Stents) randomized trial, a new-generation sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent ...(Dual-DES) demonstrated a 12-month efficacy that was comparable to sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (Cypher, Cordis Corp., Warren, New Jersey) and superior to zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) (Endeavor, Medtronic CardioVascular, Santa Rosa, California). The aim of the current study was to investigate the comparative clinical and angiographic effectiveness of SES, Dual-DES, and ZES between 1 and 2 years. Background Long-term polymer residue is implicated in adverse events associated with delayed vessel healing after drug-eluting stent therapy. The second-generation ZES utilizes an enhanced biocompatibility polymer system whereas a new-generation Dual-DES employs a polymer-free drug-release system. Methods A total of 1,007 patients undergoing coronary stenting of de novo lesions in native vessels were randomized to treatment with SES (n = 335), Dual-DES (n = 333), or ZES (n = 339). Clinical follow-up was performed to 2 years. Angiographic follow-up was scheduled at 6 to 8 months and 2 years. Results There were no significant differences between groups regarding death/myocardial infarction (SES: 10.2% vs. Dual-DES: 7.8% vs. ZES: 9.2%; p = 0.61) or definite stent thrombosis (SES: 0.9% vs. Dual-DES: 0.9% vs. ZES: 0.6%; p = 0.87). Two-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) was 10.7%, 7.7%, and 14.3% lesions in the SES, Dual-DES, and ZES groups, respectively (p = 0.009). Incident TLR between 1 and 2 years in the Dual-DES group (0.9%) was significantly lower than in the Cypher SES group (3.6%) (p = 0.009), but comparable to the Endeavor ZES group (0.7%) (p = 0.72). These findings mirrored those observed for binary restenosis. Conclusions At 2 years, there was no signal of a differential safety profile between the 3 stent platforms. Furthermore, the antirestenotic efficacy of both Dual-DES and ZES remained durable between 1 and 2 years, with Dual-DES maintaining an advantage over the entire 2-year period. (Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Three Limus-Eluting Stents ISAR-TEST-2; NCT00332397 )
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
