Nonselective adrenergic alpha-agonists such as phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine are widely used as decongestants to treat nasal congestion associated with a variety of nasal diseases. ...Although the activity of these drugs is well established in clinical studies, a direct comparison of their nasal decongestant effect as determined by changes in nasal cavity dimensions and nasal architecture has not been studied. Using acoustic rhinometry, we evaluated the effects of these drugs on nasal cavity volume, minimum cross-sectional area (Amin), and the distance from the nosepiece to the Amin (Dmin) in a feline, pharmacological model of nasal congestion. Administration of topical compound 48/80 (1%), a mast cell histamine liberator, into the left nasal passageway decreased nasal volume by 66%, reduced Amin by 51%, and increased Dmin by 116%. The congestive responses to compound 48/80 (1%) were reproducible through six weeks. In a subset of cats, the nasal cavity volume effect of repetitive exposure to compound 48/80, given once every two weeks for six weeks, was not different from the nasal responses after the initial exposure to compound 48/80. Pretreatment with oral phenylpropanolamine (10 mg/kg) or oral d-pseudoephedrine (10 mg/kg) attenuated the nasal effects of compound 48/80, but were associated with a pronounced increase in systolic blood pressure of +51 and +82 mmHg, respectively. A similar decongestant profile was observed with phenylpropanolamine (1%) and d-pseudoephedrine (1%) when given topically. Topical phenylpropanolamine (1%) and d-pseudoephedrine (1%) 45 minutes after dosing increased blood pressure +44 and +17 mmHg, respectively, over control animals. We conclude that oral and topical phenylpropanolamine and d-pseudoephedrine display equieffective nasal decongestant activity and produce similar cardiovascular profiles characterized by significant increases in blood pressure.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
This is the first report describing the use and pharmacological characterization of nasal patency by both pressure rhinometry and acoustic rhinometry (AcR) in an experimental cat model of nasal ...congestion. In pressure rhinometry studies, aerosolized compound 48/80 (0.1-3.0%), a mast cell liberator, increased nasal airway resistance (NAR) 1.2 +/- 0.6, 5.8 +/- 0.5, 8.6 +/- 1.1 and 7.9 +/- 1.5 cmH2O.L/minute, respectively. Increases in NAR produced by compound 48/80 were associated with a 395% increase in histamine concentration found in the nasal lavage fluid. Pretreatment with the alpha-adrenoreceptor agonist, phenylpropanolamine (PPA; 0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.v.), and the NO synthetase inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NAME; 10 mg/kg, i.v.) attenuated the increases in NAR produced by compound 48/80. The histamine H1 antagonist chlorpheniramine (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and the H2 antagonist, ranitidine (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) had no decongestant activity. Also without decongestant activity were the muscarinic antagonist atropine, the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin, and the 5-HT blocker methysergide. Aerosolized histamine (0.1-1.0%) also produced a dose dependent increase in NAR. In studies using acoustic rhinometry (AcR), intranasal application of compound 48/80 (0.1-1.0%) elicited pronounced decreases in nasal cavity volumes and minimum cross-sectional area (Amin). Pretreatment with PPA (3 mg/kg, i.v. or 10 mg/kg, p.o.) attenuated the decreases in nasal volume and Amin. The effects of topical intranasal histamine (0.1-1.0%) on nasal geometry were similar to compound 48/80. We conclude that the cat is a useful model for evaluating the pharmacological actions of potential nasal decongestants. Furthermore, we also conclude that AcR is a useful method for noninvasive assessment of nasal patency in a preclinical setting.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
We studied the pharmacological actions of combined histamine H
1
/H
3
receptor blockade on the increase in nasal airway resistance (NAR) and decrease in nasal cavity volume produced by nasal exposure ...to compound 48/80, a mast cell degranulator. In the anesthetized cat compound 48/80 (1%) produced a maximum increase in NAR of 9.1 ± 0.7 cmH
2
0·L/minute. The increase in NAR in animals pretreated with a combination of the H
1
antagonist, chlorpheniramine (CTM; 0.8 mg/kg i.v.) and increasing doses of the H
3
antagonist, thioperamide (THIO; 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg i.v.) were 6.1 ± 2.1, 4.2 ± 1.0 and 2.2 ± 0.7 cmH
2
0·L/minute, respectively. A second H
3
antagonist, clobenpropit (CLOB; 0.03, 0.3, and 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) combined with CTM (0.8 mg/kg i.v.) also inhibited the nasal effects of compound 48/80. When the nonsedating H
1
antihistamine, loratadine (3.0 mg/kg i.v.), was substituted for CTM, it also reduced nasal congestion when given in combination with THIO (10 mg/kg i.v.). In contrast, treatment with CTM (1.0 mg/kg i.v.) and the H
2
antagonist, ranitidine (RAN; 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) were without activity. Loratadine, CTM, CLOB, RAN, or THIO administered alone were inactive. The α-adrenergic agonist, phenylpropanolamine (PPA; 1.0 mg/kg i.v.) demonstrated decongestant effects, but in contrast to H
1
/H
3
blockade, PPA produced a significant hypertensive effect. Using acoustic rhinometry (AcR) we found that combined i.v. CTM (1.0 mg/kg) and THIO (10 mg/kg) and combined oral CTM (10 mg/kg) and THIO (30 mg/kg) blocked the decrease in nasal cavity volume produced by intranasal compound 48/80 (1%, 50 μL). We conclude that combined H
1
/H
3
histamine receptor blockade enhances the efficacy of an H
1
antagonist by conferring decongestant activity to the H
1
antihistamine. We propose that the decongestant activity of combined H
1
/H
3
blockade may provide a novel approach for the treatment of allergic nasal congestion without the hypertensive liability of current therapies.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
