Gemcitabine-cisplatin combination is one of the most used schedules for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Aiming to enhance dose intensity and reduce toxicity, the original 4-week schedule was ...modified or transformed into a 3-week schedule. The purpose of this study was to report the efficacy and tolerability of a modified 3-week regimen of gemcitabine-cisplatin.
Our patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg7sol;m
) on days 1, 8 and cisplatin on day 8 (75-100 mg/m
). The toxicity was recorded according to the NCIC criteria.
From October 2000 to December 2009 a consecutive series of 196 patients with a median age of 62 years and III-IV stage NSCLC received gemcitabine-cisplatin as induction therapy (76 patients) or palliative treatment (120 patients). The median dose intensity was 89%. In relation to day 8 of chemotherapy, 16.2% of the treatments were delayed due to hematologic toxicities. Grade 3-4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was reported in 3.5, 43.8 and 4.6%, respectively. Response rate (RR) and median overall survival (OS) were 74% and 11 months in patients with locally advanced disease, and 46.7% and 9 months in metastatic patients, respectively.
In comparison with standard or modified schedules of literature, our modified 3-week regimen of gemcitabine- cisplatin demonstrated to be equally active, similar for dose intensity and well tolerated, with better hematologic toxicity profile in terms of anaemia and thrombocytopenia.
To assess the activity of weekly paclitaxel (wPCT) in pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). In 2005, we included wPCT 80 mg/m for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by a ...2-week interval in our department’s everyday clinical practice guidelines for the second-line (or subsequent) treatment of patients with nonsquamous histologies who have previously received pemetrexed-based treatments and patients with squamous histology. In the absence of clinical evidence of disease progression, patients repeat the pretreatment staging procedures after 16 weeks (two cycles) and, in the absence of disease progression or severe toxicity, continue treatment for a maximum of four courses. Between May 2005 and December 2013, we treated 60 patients (47 in second-line and 13 in third/fourth line), who received a median of two courses (range1–4). The most frequent toxicity was grade 1–2 neutropaenia (five patients); only four patients experienced grade 3–4 toxicity. When used as a second-line treatment, wPCT led to a disease control rate of 36.2%, with a median progression-free survival of 3.7 months and a median overall survival of 9.0 months; when used in the third/fourth line, the disease control rate was 41.7%, the median progression-free survival was 5.0 months and the median overall survival was 10.3 months. Our data confirm that wPCT is active and well tolerated in an unselected patient population with aNSCLC and can be considered a valuable alternative to docetaxel in a second-line treatment.
Abstract only
LBA5501
Background: Three-weekly (3w) CP is standard first-line chemotherapy for AOC pts. Weekly (w) P combined with 3w C prolonged PFS and OS in a JGOG phase III trial. MITO-7 is an ...academic randomized phase III study, comparing 3w vs. w CP. Methods: AOC chemonaive pts, stage IC-IV, age≤75, ECOG PS≤2, were randomized to 3wCP (C AUC6 + P 175mg/m², d1q21) for 6 cycles or to wCP (C AUC2 + P 60mg/m²) for 18 administrations. Coprimary endpoints were PFS and quality of life (QoL), measured by FACT-O and FACT/GOG-Ntx. With 80% power in detecting HR of 0.75, 2-sided α=0.05, 383 events were needed for PFS analysis. The arms were compared with a log-rank test and in a Cox model adjusted by stage, PS, residual disease, age and size of institution, following intention-to-treat. QoL was measured at baseline and weekly for 9 wks. Interaction between arm and QoL time was tested in a linear mixed model. Toxicity was coded by NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: 822 pts were enrolled by MITO, MANGO, and GINECO. Median age was 60; stage III (66%) and IV (18%) were prevalent. As of March 18, 2013, with median follow-up 20 months, 410 PFS events were recorded. Median PFS was 18.8 months with wCP and 16.5 months with 3wCP (HR 0.88, 95%CI 0.72-1.06, p=0.18). Lack of significant difference was confirmed (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.71-1.05) in Cox model. For all scores, QoL course was significantly different between arms (p<0.0001). With 3wCP, QoL scores clearly worsened after each chemotherapy course (weeks 1, 4, 7), whilst with wCP, after a small and transient worsening at week 1, scores remained stable. Considering severe grades (≥3), wCP produced significantly less neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, renal toxicity, and neuropathy. Conclusions: Compared to standard CP every 3 weeks, weekly CP did not demonstrate a significant benefit in PFS, but was associated with better QoL and toxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT00660842.
Introduction Although some studies have suggested that gemcitabine delivered as a fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion of 10 mg/m²/min could be more effective than when administered as the standard 30-min ...infusion, the available pharmacokinetic data are still too limited to draw definitive conclusions. This study is aimed to investigate the plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine given as FDR at doses of 600 and 1,200 mg/m² in combination with 75 mg/m² of cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients and method The patients were divided into two groups receiving different initial doses of the drug: 4 patients received 600 mg/m² gemcitabine 60-min i.v. infusion and 4 patients 1,200 mg/m² gemcitabine 120-min i.v. infusion both as a FDR of 10 mg/m²/min on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle (at first cycle). At the second cycle, all patients were treated with gemcitabine at 1,200 mg/m² 120-min i.v. infusion (FDR of 10 mg/m²/min) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. At each cycle, gemcitabine was administered alone on day one, and in combination with 75 mg/m² of cisplatin on day 8. Plasmatic and intracellular pharmacokinetic analyses were performed on blood samples collected at defined time points before, during and after gemcitabine infusion. Results The plasmatic pharmacokinetic parameters were clearly different when the patients received a higher gemcitabine dose in the second cycle compared to the lower dose of the first course; in the same time, the intracellular drug levels were not modified. Comparing the pharmacokinetic parameters of different patients treated at different dose levels, the results appeared to be quite similar. Conclusions A substantially higher accumulation of metabolites in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was observed when the longer infusion time was employed, suggesting a pharmacological advantage for this treatment schedule.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
PDF
