Abstract Background Body composition plays an important role in predicting treatment outcomes in adults with cancer. Using existing computed tomographic (CT) cross-sectional imaging and readily ...available software, the assessment of skeletal muscle mass to evaluate sarcopenia has become simplified. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the prognostic value of skeletal muscle index (SMI) obtained from cross-sectional CT imaging on clinical outcomes in non-haematologic solid tumours. Methods We searched PubMed and the American Society Clinical Oncology online database of meeting abstracts up to October 2015 for relevant studies. We included studies assessing the prognostic impact of pre-treatment SMI on clinical outcomes in patients with non-haematologic solid tumours. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes included cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The summary hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results A total of 7843 patients from 38 studies were included. SMI lower than the cut-off was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.32–1.56, p < 0.001). The effect of SMI on OS was observed among various tumour types and across disease stages. Worse CSS was also associated with low SMI (HR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.38–2.70, p < 0.001) as well as DFS (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.00–1.30, p = 0.014), but not PFS (HR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.90–2.64, p = 0.117). Conclusions This meta-analysis demonstrates that low SMI at cancer diagnosis is associated with worse survival in patients with solid tumours. Further research into understanding and mitigating the negative effects of sarcopenia in adults with cancer is needed.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Highlights • This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of ICIs between younger and older patients. • ICIs significantly improved OS in both younger (HR, 0.75) and older (HR, 0.73) groups. • An ...improvement in PFS was observed in younger (HR, 0.58) and older (HR, 0.77) patients. • In the PD-1 inhibitor subgroup, a significant benefit was not seen in the patients aged 7 75 years.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Cancer is a disease of aging and, as the world's population ages, the number of older persons with cancer is increasing and will make up a growing share of the oncology population in virtually every ...country. Despite this, older patients remain vastly underrepresented in research that sets the standards for cancer treatments. Consequently, most of what we know about cancer therapeutics is based on clinical trials conducted in younger, healthier patients, and effective strategies to improve clinical trial participation of older adults with cancer remain sparse. For this systematic review, the authors evaluated published studies regarding barriers to participation and interventions to improve participation of older adults in cancer trials. The quality of the available evidence was low and, despite a literature describing multifaceted barriers, only one intervention study aimed to increase enrollment of older adults in trials. The findings starkly amplify the paucity of evidence‐based, effective strategies to improve participation of this underrepresented population in cancer trials. Within these limitations, the authors provide their opinion on how the current cancer research infrastructure must be modified to accommodate the needs of older patients. Several underused solutions are offered to expand clinical trials to include older adults with cancer. However, as currently constructed, these recommendations alone will not solve the evidence gap in geriatric oncology, and efforts are needed to meet older and frail adults where they are by expanding clinical trials designed specifically for this population and leveraging real‐world data.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK, VSZLJ
To develop recommendations about endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor (HR) -positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to ...conduct a systematic review of evidence from 2008 through 2015 to create recommendations informed by that evidence. Outcomes of interest included sequencing of hormonal agents, hormonal agents compared with chemotherapy, targeted biologic therapy, and treatment of premenopausal women. This guideline puts forth recommendations for endocrine therapy as treatment for women with HR-positive MBC.
Sequential hormone therapy is the preferential treatment for most women with HR-positive MBC. Except in cases of immediately life-threatening disease, hormone therapy, alone or in combination, should be used as initial treatment. Patients whose tumors express any level of hormone receptors should be offered hormone therapy. Treatment recommendations should be based on type of adjuvant treatment, disease-free interval, and organ function. Tumor markers should not be the sole criteria for determining tumor progression; use of additional biomarkers remains experimental. Assessment of menopausal status is critical; ovarian suppression or ablation should be included in premenopausal women. For postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are the preferred first-line endocrine therapy, with or without the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor palbociclib. As second-line therapy, fulvestrant should be administered at 500 mg with a loading schedule and may be administered with palbociclib. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus may be administered with exemestane to postmenopausal women with MBC whose disease progresses while receiving nonsteroidal AIs. Among patients with HR-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive MBC, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapy plus an AI can be effective for those who are not chemotherapy candidates.
Background
Compared with chemotherapy, significant improvement in survival outcomes with the programmed death receptor‐1 (PD‐1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab and the programmed death‐ligand ...1 (PD‐L1) inhibitor atezolizumab has been shown in several types of advanced solid tumors. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare safety and tolerability between PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.
Methods
PubMed and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were searched 1966 to September 2016. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single‐agent U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, or atezolizumab) with chemotherapy in cancer patients reporting any all‐grade (1–4) or high‐grade (3–4) adverse events (AEs), all‐ or high‐grade treatment‐related symptoms, hematologic toxicities and immune‐related AEs, treatment discontinuation due to toxicities, or treatment‐related deaths. The summary incidence, relative risk, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Results
A total of 3,450 patients from 7 RCTs were included in the meta‐analysis: 4 nivolumab, 2 pembrolizumab, and 1 atezolizumab trials. The underlying malignancies included were non‐small cell lung cancer (4 trials) and melanoma (3 trials). Compared with chemotherapy, the PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors had a significantly lower risk of all‐ and high‐grade fatigue, sensory neuropathy, diarrhea and hematologic toxicities, all‐grade anorexia, nausea, and constipation, any all‐ and high‐grade AEs, and treatment discontinuation. There was an increased risk of all‐grade rash, pruritus, colitis, aminotransferase elevations, hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism, and all‐ and high‐grade pneumonitis with PD1/PD‐L1 inhibitors.
Conclusion
PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. Our results provide further evidence supporting the favorable risk/benefit ratio for PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors.
Implications for Practice
We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare summary toxicity endpoints and clinically relevant adverse events between programmed death receptor‐1 (PD‐1)/programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) inhibitors and chemotherapy. PD1/PD‐L1 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of treatment‐related symptoms (fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, and sensory neuropathy) but a higher risk of immune‐related adverse events (AEs). Summary toxicity endpoints favor PD1/PD‐L1 inhibitors (any all‐ and high‐grade AEs and treatment discontinuation). PD1/PD‐L1 inhibitors are overall better tolerated than chemotherapy. In addition to efficacy data from trials, our findings provide useful information for clinicians for well‐balanced discussions with their patients on the risks and benefits of treatment options for advanced cancer.
The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors represents a major breakthrough in cancer therapy. This systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare summary toxicity endpoints and clinically relevant adverse events between PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy.
Poor body composition metrics (BCM) are associated with inferior cancer outcomes; however, in early breast cancer (EBC), there is a paucity of evidence regarding the impact of BCM on toxicities. This ...study investigates associations between BCM and treatment-related toxicity in patients with EBC receiving anthracyclines and taxane-based chemotherapy.
Pretreatment computerized tomographic (CT) images were evaluated for skeletal muscle area (SMA), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and fat tissue at the third lumbar vertebrae. Skeletal muscle index (SMI = SMA/height
) and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG = SMI × SMD) were also calculated. Relative risks (RR) are reported for associations between body composition measures and toxicity outcomes, after adjustment for age and body surface area (BSA).
BCM were calculated for 151 patients with EBC (median age, 49 years; range, 23-75 years). Fifty patients (33%) developed grade 3/4 toxicity, which was significantly higher in those with low SMI (RR, 1.29;
= 0.002), low SMG (RR, 1.09;
= 0.01), and low lean body mass (RR, 1.48;
= 0.002). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the SMG measure to be the best predictor of grade 3/4 toxicity. Dividing SMG into tertiles showed toxicity rates of 46% and 22% for lowest versus highest tertile, respectively (
= 0.005). After adjusting for age and BSA, low SMG (<1,475 units) was significantly associated with hematologic (RR, 2.12;
= 0.02), gastrointestinal grade 3/4 toxicities (RR, 6.49;
= 0.02), and hospitalizations (RR, 1.91;
= 0.05).
Poor BCMs are significantly associated with increased treatment-related toxicities. Further studies are needed to investigate how these metrics can be used to more precisely dose chemotherapy to reduce treatment-related toxicity while maintaining efficacy.
.
Highlights • This meta-analysis quantified the prognostic value of LMR in solid tumors. • LMR lower than the cut-off was associated with poor OS (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.55–1.93). • The effect of LMR on ...OS was observed in among various tumors and disease stages. • A low LMR was an unfavorable prognostic factor for CSS (HR, 1.56) and DFS (HR, 1.56).
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
To provide recommendations on the follow-up and management of patients with breast cancer who have completed primary therapy with curative intent.
To update the 2006 guideline of the American Society ...of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), a systematic review of the literature published from March 2006 through March 2012 was completed using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library. An Update Committee reviewed the evidence to determine whether the recommendations were in need of updating.
There were 14 new publications that met inclusion criteria: nine systematic reviews (three included meta-analyses) and five randomized controlled trials. After its review and analysis of the evidence, the Update Committee concluded that no revisions to the existing ASCO recommendations were warranted.
Regular history, physical examination, and mammography are recommended for breast cancer follow-up. Physical examinations should be performed every 3 to 6 months for the first 3 years, every 6 to 12 months for years 4 and 5, and annually thereafter. For women who have undergone breast-conserving surgery, a post-treatment mammogram should be obtained 1 year after the initial mammogram and at least 6 months after completion of radiation therapy. Thereafter, unless otherwise indicated, a yearly mammographic evaluation should be performed. The use of complete blood counts, chemistry panels, bone scans, chest radiographs, liver ultrasounds, pelvic ultrasounds, computed tomography scans, (18)Ffluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, CA 15-3, and CA 27.29) is not recommended for routine follow-up in an otherwise asymptomatic patient with no specific findings on clinical examination.
Limited tools exist to predict the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.
Patients of age ≥ 65 years with stage I-III breast cancer from 16 institutions treated ...with neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were prospectively evaluated for geriatric and clinical features predictive of grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity. Logistic regression with best-subsets selection was used to identify and incorporate independent predictors of toxicity into a model with weighted variable scoring. Model performance was evaluated using area under the ROC curve (AUC) and goodness-of-fit statistics. The model was internally and externally validated.
In 473 patients (283 in development and 190 in validation cohort), 46% developed grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicities. Eight independent predictors were identified (each assigned weighted points): anthracycline use (1 point), stage II or III (3 points), planned treatment duration > 3 months (4 points), abnormal liver function (3 points), low hemoglobin (3 points), falls (4 points), limited walking (3 points), and lack of social support (3 points). We calculated risk scores for each patient and defined three risk groups: low (0-5 points), intermediate (6-11 points), or high (≥ 12 points). In the development cohort, the rates of grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity for these three groups were 19%, 54%, and 87%, respectively (
< .01). In the validation cohort, the corresponding toxicity rates were 27%, 45%, and 76%. The AUC was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.81) in the development cohort and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.77) in the validation cohort. Risk groups were also associated with hospitalizations and reduced dose intensity (
< .01).
The Cancer and Aging Research Group-Breast Cancer (CARG-BC) score was developed and validated to predict grade 3-5 chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with early-stage breast cancer.
PDF
