Background
In light of the modern surgical trend towards minimally invasive surgery, we aim to assess the feasibility of hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic ...intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM).
Methods
Patients with PSM secondary to colorectal cancer or pseudomyxoma peritonei with peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of ≤ 10 were considered for HAL CRS and HIPEC. One patient had PCI of 15 but based on the disease distribution laparoscopic-assisted CRS and HIPEC was thought to be feasible, thus was also included. These patients were compared to matched controls who underwent open CRS and HIPEC for similar pathologies. Matching was performed on age and PCI to reflect a comparable complexity of the operation, and tumor grade for comparable risk of disease recurrence.
Results
Eleven patients were included in each group. In both groups, mean PCI was 4.1, mean age was 58.5 years, and 81.8% were well-moderately differentiated tumors. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in all patients. Upon comparison, HAL patients had significantly less blood loss and 3-day shorter hospitalization. No difference was demonstrated in operative time, number of visceral resections, and rate of omentectomy/peritonectomy. Also, no difference was detected in morbidities and 30-day readmission rates. No intraperitoneal recurrences have been reported in the HAL group after a median follow-up of 11 months.
Conclusion
HAL CRS and HIPEC is a feasible procedure and can be considered for PSM with low PCI. It offers very acceptable and comparable short-term outcomes to the conventional open approach.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Introduction
We conducted this analysis to compare the outcomes of open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTTE) and minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy (MITTE) when performed for oncologic ...indications.
Methods
The NSQIP esophagectomy-targeted database during 2-year period was used. Only patients who underwent elective TTE for oncologic indications were included. Patients were matched per a propensity score for the likelihood of receiving OTTE versus MITTE.
Results
Overall, 2098 esophagectomies were reported; 576 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 161 purely OTTE patients were matched 1:1 with patients who received purely MITTE. OTTE was associated with higher reported rates of abdominal and mediastinal lymphadenectomies (LAD) (26.7% vs. 3.1% and 38.5% vs. 16.1%, respectively;
p
< 0.001) and had shorter mean operative time (329 vs. 414 min;
p
< 0.001). However, OTTE patients had higher rates of wound infection (7.5% vs. 1.9%), longer median hospitalization (10 vs. 8 days), more non-home discharges (18.0 vs. 8.1%), and a tendency toward higher rates of postoperative transfusion (13.0% vs. 6.8%;
p
= 0.092). The overall complications rate was higher in OTTE (46.0% vs. 33.5%;
p
= 0.028). No difference was noted in the rates of anastomotic leak, negative margins, reoperation, readmission, or mortality. Laparoscopic versus robotic approaches were uniformly comparable, except for higher rates of reported abdominal LAD in laparoscopic and higher rates of reported mediastinal LAD in robotic approach.
Conclusions
MITTE is comparable to OTTE for oncologic indications in immediate postoperative outcomes. A concern is raised regarding the oncologic outcome given the lower reported rates of lymphadenectomies. Comparison of long-term outcomes is essential to address this concern.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Background
Factors associated with refusal of multimodality therapy in patients with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) remain unknown. We hypothesized that sociodemographic disparities affect ...decision to pursue optimal trimodally therapy for patients with EA.
Methods
NCDB for esophageal cancer (2004-2017) was utilized. Included were patients diagnosed with cT3-T4 cN0 or cTany N1-3 EA of the mid-lower esophagus. Annual institutional esophagectomy volumes were categorized as low (<20/year) and high (≥20/year). Conditional logistic regression was used to identify predictors of refusal of offered treatment. Kaplan Meier method was used to compare survival.
Results
13 091 patients met selection criteria, mean age was 62.4 ± 9.6 years and 11 581 (88.5%) were males. 633 (4.8%) patients refused at least one component of recommended treatment (chemotherapy, radiation, and esophagectomy), most commonly refusal of surgery (N = 554, 4.2%). On multivariable analysis, factors predictive of treatment refusal included older age, female gender, black race, no insurance, low income (below poverty), mid-esophageal tumors, and treatment at low-volume centers. Patients who were recommended treatment but refused had significantly worse survival than those who adhered to treatment (median 23.1 ± 1.1 vs. 32.1 ± 1.2 months; P < .001).
Conclusions
In this study, sociodemographic disparities and center volume were among factors predictive of therapy refusal in patients with localized esophageal adenocarcinoma. While understanding potential reasons for treatment refusal is critical, this data suggests that socioeconomic variables may drive patient decisions.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Background
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been associated with significant morbidity and increased hospital length of stay (LOS). The authors ...report their experience after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program for CRS-HIPEC.
Methods
Outcomes were analyzed before and after ERAS implementation. The components of ERAS included preoperative carbohydrate loading, goal-directed fluid management, multimodal pain management, minimization of narcotic use, avoidance of nasogastric tubes, and early mobilization and feeding.
Results
Of 168 procedures, 88 (52%) were in the pre-ERAS group and 80 (48%) were in the post-ERAS group. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index scores, completeness of cytoreduction, or operative time. The ERAS patients received fewer fluids intraoperatively (mean, 4.2 vs 6.4 L;
p
< 0.01). The mean LOS was 7.9 days post-ERAS compared with 10.0 days pre-ERAS (
p
= 0.015). Clavien–Dindo complications classified as grade ≥ 3 were lower after ERAS (23.7% vs 38.6%;
p
= 0.04). Moreover, the readmission rates remained the same (16.2% vs 13.6%;
p
= 0.635).
Conclusions
Implementation of an ERAS program for patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC is feasible and not associated with an increase in overall major complications or readmissions. These data support incorporation of ERAS protocols for CRS-HIPEC procedures.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Background
Axillary management varies between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinical N1 (cN1), hormone receptor-positive (HR+), ...human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu-negative (HER2–), infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC) who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). This study sought to evaluate clinical practice patterns and survival outcomes of SLNB versus ALND in this patient subset.
Methods
Patients with cN1, HR+/HER2–, unilateral IDC demonstrating a cCR to NAST were identified from the 2012–2017 National Cancer Database (NCDB) and stratified based on final axillary surgery management (SLNB vs ALND). After propensity score-matching, overall survival (OS) was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, and significant OS predictors were identified using Cox regression.
Results
Of the 1676 patients selected for this study, 593 (35.4%) underwent SLNB and 1083 (64.6%) underwent ALND. Use of SLNB increased by 28 % between 2012 and 2017. Among a total of 584 matched patients, 461 matched ypN0 patients, and 108 matched ypN+ patients, mean OS did not differ between SLNB and ALND (all patients 92.1 ± 0.8 vs 90.2 ± 1.0 months;
p
= 0.157, ypN0 patients 92.4 ± 0.8 vs 89.9 ± 0.9 months;
p
= 0.105, ypN+ patients 83.5 ± 2.3 vs 91.7 ± 2.7 months;
p
± 0.963). Cox regression identified age, Charlson score, clinical T stage, and pathologic nodal status as significant predictors of OS.
Conclusion
The final surgical management strategy used for cN1, HR+/HER2– IDC patients who achieved a cCR to NAST did not have a significant impact on survival outcomes in this analysis. Potential opportunities for de-escalation of axillary management among this patient subset exist, and validation studies are needed.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Introduction
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) drives morbidity and mortality following pancreatectomy. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has recently increased in the treatment of ...potentially resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study examined the effect of NAC on POPF rates and postoperative outcomes in PDAC.
Methods
The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Pancreatectomy dataset was queried to identify PDAC patients who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomies. Propensity score matching was used to stratify patients by receipt of NAC. Postoperative outcomes were compared and logistic regression applied to identify POPF predictors.
Results
Six thousand eight hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria; of those, 1908 (27.8%) received NAC and 4955 (72.2%) did not (NNAC). Two thousand sixty-two patients were matched 1:1 from each group. NAC patients had significantly lower POPF rates (9.0% vs. 14.5%;
P
< 0.001); the majority were categorized as grade A (5.1% vs. 9.5%). Overall 30-day morbidity was lower with NAC (40.4% vs. 49.5%;
P
< 0.001). Specifically, pneumonia (2.3% vs. 4.1%), organ space infections (7.9% vs. 13.2%), sepsis (5.2% vs. 8.0%), and delayed gastric emptying (10.1% vs. 14.8%) occurred less frequently in the NAC group. Postoperative mortality and unplanned reoperations were similar. On multivariate analysis, receipt of NAC was an independent predictor of decreased POPF rates (HR, 0.73 0.56–0.94;
P
= 0.016). Other factors included gland texture, duct size, male gender, and lower BMI.
Conclusions
In this propensity-matched, population-based cohort study of PDAC patients, NAC was associated with lower POPF rates and overall major complications. Those findings suggest a modest protective effect of NAC from POPF.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FZAB, GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
