AZD9291, an irreversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor, was associated with tumor responses in the majority of patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer in whom T790M-mediated ...drug resistance to other EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors had developed.
Somatic mutations in the gene encoding epidermal growth factor receptor (
EGFR
) are detected in approximately 30 to 40% of non–small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) from Asian patients and in 10% of NSCLCs from white patients.
1
–
3
EGFR
mutations lead to constitutive activation of EGFR signaling and oncogenic transformation both in vitro and in vivo.
4
,
5
Cancers with
EGFR
mutations (
EGFR-
mutated cancers) depend on EGFR signaling for growth and survival and are often sensitive to treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
6
Among patients with advanced
EGFR-
mutated NSCLC, treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib, erlotinib, and . . .
PURPOSEMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Patients with MPM who do not respond to standard first-line chemotherapy have limited treatment ...options. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, for the treatment of advanced or metastatic MPM. PATIENTS AND METHODSJapanese patients with unresectable, advanced, or metastatic MPM resistant or intolerant to ≤2 regimens of chemotherapy and ≥1 measurable lesion(s) were enrolled. Patients received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by central assessment according to the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events (AEs) and treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were evaluated. RESULTSThirty-four patients were enrolled between July 2016 and October 2016. Median follow-up was 16.8 (range: 1.8-20.2) months. Ten (29%, 95% confidence interval, 16.8-46.2) patients showed a centrally assessed objective response. The objective response rates were 26% (7/27), 67% (2/3), and 25% (1/4) patients for epithelioid, sarcomatoid, and biphasic histologic subtypes, respectively. Median duration of response was 11.1 months with a 68% disease control rate. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 17.3 and 6.1 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 40% with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥1% and 8% with <1%. Thirty-two patients (94%) experienced AEs and 26 (76%) experienced TRAEs. CONCLUSIONSNivolumab met the primary endpoint as second- or third-line treatment for patients with MPM and showed promising efficacy with manageable toxicity.See related commentary by Mansfield and Zauderer, p. 5438.
Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify images of melanoma, with accuracies comparable to those achieved by dermatologists. However, the ...performance of a CNN trained with only clinical images of a pigmented skin lesion in a clinical image classification task, in competition with dermatologists, has not been reported to date. In this study, we extracted 5846 clinical images of pigmented skin lesions from 3551 patients. Pigmented skin lesions included malignant tumors (malignant melanoma and basal cell carcinoma) and benign tumors (nevus, seborrhoeic keratosis, senile lentigo, and hematoma/hemangioma). We created the test dataset by randomly selecting 666 patients out of them and picking one image per patient, and created the training dataset by giving bounding-box annotations to the rest of the images (4732 images, 2885 patients). Subsequently, we trained a faster, region-based CNN (FRCNN) with the training dataset and checked the performance of the model on the test dataset. In addition, ten board-certified dermatologists (BCDs) and ten dermatologic trainees (TRNs) took the same tests, and we compared their diagnostic accuracy with FRCNN. For six-class classification, the accuracy of FRCNN was 86.2%, and that of the BCDs and TRNs was 79.5% (
= 0.0081) and 75.1% (
< 0.00001), respectively. For two-class classification (benign or malignant), the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 91.5%, 83.3%, and 94.5% by FRCNN; 86.6%, 86.3%, and 86.6% by BCD; and 85.3%, 83.5%, and 85.9% by TRN, respectively. False positive rates and positive predictive values were 5.5% and 84.7% by FRCNN, 13.4% and 70.5% by BCD, and 14.1% and 68.5% by TRN, respectively. We compared the classification performance of FRCNN with 20 dermatologists. As a result, the classification accuracy of FRCNN was better than that of the dermatologists. In the future, we plan to implement this system in society and have it used by the general public, in order to improve the prognosis of skin cancer.
Full text
Available for:
IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
Purpose The AURA study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01802632) included two cohorts of treatment-naïve patients to examine clinical activity and safety of osimertinib (an epidermal growth ...factor receptor EGFR -tyrosine kinase inhibitor selective for EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor sensitizing EGFRm and EGFR T790M resistance mutations) as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Sixty treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFRm NSCLC received osimertinib 80 or 160 mg once daily (30 patients per cohort). End points included investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety evaluation. Plasma samples were collected at or after patients experienced disease progression, as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), to investigate osimertinib resistance mechanisms. Results At data cutoff (November 1, 2016), median follow-up was 19.1 months. Overall ORR was 67% (95% CI, 47% to 83%) in the 80-mg group, 87% (95% CI, 69% to 96%) in the 160-mg group, and 77% (95% CI, 64% to 87%) across doses. Median PFS time was 22.1 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 30.2 months) in the 80-mg group, 19.3 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 26.0 months) in the 160-mg group, and 20.5 months (95% CI, 15.0 to 26.1 months) across doses. Of 38 patients with postprogression plasma samples, 50% had no detectable circulating tumor DNA. Nine of 19 patients had putative resistance mechanisms, including amplification of MET (n = 1); amplification of EGFR and KRAS (n = 1); MEK1, KRAS, or PIK3CA mutation (n = 1 each); EGFR C797S mutation (n = 2); JAK2 mutation (n = 1); and HER2 exon 20 insertion (n = 1). Acquired EGFR T790M was not detected. Conclusion Osimertinib demonstrated a robust ORR and prolonged PFS in treatment-naïve patients with EGFRm advanced NSCLC. There was no evidence of acquired EGFR T790M mutation in postprogression plasma samples.
Thyroid dysfunction (TD) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors is not sufficiently understood. The purpose of this retrospective observational study was to identify risk factors and the clinical ...course of TD induced by nivolumab. Patients with advanced solid tumors who were treated with nivolumab from March 2009 through to March 2016 at the National Cancer Center Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were included. Thyroid function and antithyroid Abs from serum samples among all patients were evaluated at baseline and during nivolumab treatment. Overt hypothyroidism was defined as low serum‐free T4 together with elevated thyroid‐stimulating hormone (TSH) >10 μIU/mL. Thyrotoxicosis was defined as low TSH with elevated free T4 and/or free T3. We defined thyroid autoimmunity as the presence of antithyroid Abs at baseline, including antithyroid peroxidase Abs and antithyroglobulin Abs (TgAb). Twenty‐three (14%) of a total of 168 patients developed TD, including 17 cases of hypothyroidism and 20 of thyrotoxicosis. Thyrotoxicosis followed by hypothyroidism occurred in 14 cases. Fourteen of 35 patients (40%) with thyroid autoimmunity developed TD vs 9 of 133 (7%) without (odds ratio 9.19; 95% confidence interval CI, 3.53‐23.9). In multivariate analysis, elevated TSH and TgAb at baseline were significantly associated with the development of TD, with odds ratio of 7.36 (95% CI, 1.66‐32.7) and 26.5 (95% CI, 8.18‐85.8), respectively. Association between TD and elevated antithyroid peroxidase Abs at baseline was not significant. These results suggest that patients with pre‐existing TgAb and elevated TSH at baseline are at high risk of TD.
Thyroid dysfunction induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors is not sufficiently understood. This retrospective observational study revealed that pre‐existing antithyroglobulin Abs and elevated thyroid‐stimulating hormone before nivolumab treatment are risk factors for the development of thyroid dysfunction induced by nivolumab.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
In the FLAURA trial Japanese subset, osimertinib significantly improved median PFS versus standard-of-care (gefitinib) in patients with previously untreated EGFR (exon 19 deletion or L858R) ...mutation-positive advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Abstract
Background
The FLAURA study was a multicenter, double-blind, Phase 3 study in which patients with previously untreated epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma were randomized 1:1 to oral osimertinib 80 mg once daily or standard-of-care (gefitinib 250 mg or erlotinib 150 mg, once daily) to compare safety and efficacy. In the overall FLAURA study, significantly better progression-free survival was shown with osimertinib versus standard-of-care.
Methods
Selected endpoints, including progression-free survival (primary endpoint), overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response and safety were evaluated for the Japanese subset of the FLAURA study.
Results
In Japan, 120 eligible Japanese patients were randomized to osimertinib (65 patients) or gefitinib (55 patients) treatment from December 2014 to June 2017. Median progression-free survival was 19.1 (95% confidence interval, 12.6, 23.5) and 13.8 (95% confidence interval, 8.3, 16.6) months with osimertinib and gefitinib, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.38, 0.99). Median overall survival was not reached in either treatment arm (data were immature). In the osimertinib and gefitinib arms, objective response rate was 75.4% (49/65) and 76.4% (42/55), and median duration of response from onset was 18.4 (95% confidence interval, not calculated) and 9.5 (95% confidence interval, 6.2, 13.9) months, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. The frequency of Grade ≥3 interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis in the two groups were the same (one patient).
Conclusions
As the first-line therapy, osimertinib showed significantly improved efficacy versus gefitinib in the Japanese population of the FLAURA study. No new safety concerns were raised.
Clinical trial registration
NCT02296125 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
In CheckMate 227, nivolumab plus ipilimumab prolonged overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy in patients with tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) greater than or equal to 1% (primary end ...point) or less than 1% (prespecified descriptive analysis). We report results with minimum 4 years' follow-up.
Adults with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC were randomized (1:1:1) to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 ≥1%); or to nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Efficacy included OS and other measures. Safety included timing and management of immune-mediated adverse events (AEs). A post hoc analysis evaluated efficacy in patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to treatment-related AEs (TRAEs).
After 54.8 months' median follow-up, OS remained longer with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 1% (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65–0.90) and PD-L1 less than 1% (0.64; 0.51–0.81); 4-year OS rate with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was 29% versus 18% (PD-L1 ≥1%); and 24% versus 10% (PD-L1 <1%). Benefits were observed in both squamous and nonsquamous histologies. In a descriptive analysis, efficacy was improved with nivolumab plus ipilimumab relative to nivolumab (PD-L1 ≥1%) and nivolumab plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 <1%). Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common immune-mediated AE with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, nivolumab, and nivolumab plus chemotherapy was rash; most immune-mediated AEs (except endocrine events) occurred within 6 months from start of treatment and resolved within 3 months after, mainly with systemic corticosteroids. Patients who discontinued nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs had long-term OS benefits, as seen in the all randomized population.
At more than 4 years' minimum follow-up, with all patients off immunotherapy treatment for at least 2 years, first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab continued to demonstrate durable long-term efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC. No new safety signals were identified. Immune-mediated AEs occurred early and resolved quickly with guideline-based management. Discontinuation of nivolumab plus ipilimumab due to TRAEs did not have a negative impact on the long-term benefits seen in all randomized patients.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options, especially after relapse.
In this open-label, two-stage, multicentre, single-arm and phase II trial, the ...main eligibility criteria were unresectable or recurrent TC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–performance status of 0 or 1, progression after at least one chemo(radio)therapy and no history of autoimmune disease. Nivolumab was administered at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary end-point was response rate (RR) as evaluated by central review using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST), version 1.1. The planned sample size was 15 for each stage, with a threshold RR of 5%, an expected RR of 20%, one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%.
Between July 1 and August 16 2016, 15 patients were accrued in the first stage. Response was assessable in all patients, and 13 had squamous histology. Median follow-up time was 14.1 months (range: 2.4–17.5). The median number of nivolumab received was eight (range: 3–33). RR was 0% (95% confidential interval CI: 0–21.8). Eleven patients had stable disease (SD) including five patients with SD for 24 or more weeks. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 months (95% CI: 1.9–7.0). Two patients experienced immune-related serious adverse events (grade III aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase and grade II adrenal insufficiency). Because the early termination criteria (less than one responder) were fulfilled during the first stage, the patient accrual was terminated.
Despite the small number of patients, nivolumab was unable to produce tumour shrinkage by RECIST in previously treated unresectable or recurrent TC.
•Thymic carcinoma (TC) is a rare cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options.•This is the first phase II trial of nivolumab for pretreated unresectable or recurrent TC.•Nivolumab produced no responders among the 15 patients accrued during the first stage.•Only two patients developed serious immune-related adverse events, both of which were resolved.•However, the disease control rate of 73% suggested some clinical benefit of nivolumab in TC.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Previous clinical trials indicate that 10%–25% of patients received genomically matched therapy after comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests. However, the clinical utility of CGP tests has not ...been assessed in clinical practice. We assessed the clinical utility of CGP tests for advanced or metastatic solid tumor and determined the proportion of patients receiving genomically matched therapy among those with common and non‐common cancers. From August 2019 to July 2020, a total of 418 patients had undergone CGP tests, and the results were discussed through the molecular tumor board at our site. The median age of patients was 57 (range: 3–86) years. Colorectal cancer was the most common, with 47 (11%) patients. Actionable genomic alterations (median 3, range: 1–17) were identified in 368 (88.0%) of 418 patients. Druggable genomic alterations were determined in 196 (46.9%) of 418 patients through the molecular tumor board. Genomically matched therapy was administered as the subsequent line of therapy in 51 (12.2%) patients, which is comparable to the proportion we previously reported in a clinical trial (13.4%) (p = 0.6919). The proportion of patients receiving genomically matched therapy was significantly higher among those with common cancers (16.2%) than non‐common cancers (9.4%) (p = 0.0365). Genomically matched therapy after the CGP tests was administered to 12.2% of patients, which is similar to the proportion reported in the previous clinical trials. The clinical utility of CGP tests in patients with common cancers greatly exceeded that in patients with non‐common cancers.
Genomically matched therapy after comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests was administered to 12.2% of patients in clinical practice. We demonstrated the clinical utility of CGP tests in clinical practice, particularly among those with common cancers who received genomically matched therapy more frequently than those with non‐common cancers.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
PDF
