Many placebo controlled trials and meta-analyses evaluated the efficacy of different drugs for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease(IBD),including immunosuppressants and biologics.Their use is ...indicated in moderate to severe disease in non responders to corticosteroids and in steroid-dependent patients,as induction and maintainance treatment.Infliximab,as well as cyclosporine,is considered a second line therapy in the case of severe ulcerative colitis,or non-responders to intravenous corticosteroids.An adequate dosage and duration of therapy with thiopurines should be reached before evaluating their efficacy.Methotrexate is a valid option in patients with Crohn’s disease but its use is confined to patients who are intolerant or non-responders to thiopurines.Evidence for the use of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis is insufficient.The use of thalidomide and mycophenolate mofetil is not recommended in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,these treatments could be considered in case of failure of all other therapeutic options.In patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis,refractory to thiopurines,the use of tacrolimus is considered an alternative to biologics.An increase of the dose or a decrease in the interval of administration of biologic treatment could be useful in the presence of an incomplete clinical response.In the case of primary failure of an anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha a switch to another one should be considered.Data on the efficacy of combination therapy are up to now insufficient to consider this strategy in all IBD patients.The final outcome of the treatment should be considered the clinical remission,with mucosa healing,and not the clinical response.The evaluation of serum concentration of thiopurine methyl transferase activity,thiopurine metabolites,biologic serum levels and antibiologic antibodies could be useful for the management of the treatment but it has not been routinely applied in clinical practice.The evidence of high risk development of lymphoma and cutaneous malignancies should be considered in patients treated with immunosuppressants and biologics for a long period.
The chronic inflammation of Crohn's disease is caused, at least in part, by repression of TGF-β1 signaling, which is caused by high levels of SMAD7. This trial shows that mongersen, an antisense ...inhibitor of
SMAD7
mRNA, induces disease remission in some persons.
Crohn’s disease is a chronic inflammatory illness that primarily affects the terminal ileum and right colon. Crohn’s disease–related inflammation is segmental and transmural, leading to various degrees of tissue damage.
1
At disease onset, most patients have inflammatory lesions, which become predominantly strictures or penetrating lesions over time.
2
,
3
Mucosal healing can be promoted with the use of immunosuppressive drugs and anti–tumor necrosis factor
α
(TNF-
α
) antibodies; however, more than one third of patients do not have a response to these therapies. The efficacy of these drugs may also diminish over time, and they can increase a patient’s risk . . .
During past years, the increasing knowledge of molecular mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have led to the development of several targeted biological therapies. This great expansion of ...available medical options has prompted the need for comparative data between drugs. For years, given that most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed only versus placebo, this demand has clashed with the absence of head-to-head trials comparing two or more treatments. The quality of evidence coming from real-world experience was low overall, so it was extremely difficult to clarify the correct positioning of the biologicals inside the therapeutic algorithms for IBD. Fortunately, times are changing: head-to-head comparative RCTs have been conducted or are ongoing, and the methodological quality of real-world studies is gradually increasing, mainly thanks to a higher rate of application of statistical methods capable of reducing the selection bias, such as the propensity score. In this evolving scenario, the increasing number of comparative RCTs is providing high-quality data for a correct drug positioning in IBD. In parallel, real-world observational studies are supporting the data coming from RCTs, and covering those comparisons not performed in the RCT setting. We believe that there is moderate evidence already available to support clinicians in the correct choice between different biologicals, and data will certainly be more robust in the near future.
Background & Aims Few data are available on effects of biologic therapies in patients more than 65 years old with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We evaluated the risk and benefits of therapy with ...tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in these patients. Methods We collected data from patients with IBD treated with infliximab (n = 2475) and adalimumab (n = 604) from 2000 to 2009 at 16 tertiary centers. Ninety-five patients (3%) were more than 65 years old (52 men; 37 with ulcerative colitis and 58 with Crohn's disease; 78 treated with infliximab and 17 with adalimumab). The control group comprised 190 patients 65 years old or younger who were treated with both biologics and 190 patients older than 65 years who were treated with other drugs. The primary end points were severe infection, cancer, or death. Results Among patients more than 65 years old who received infliximab and adalimumab, 11% developed severe infections, 3% developed neoplasms, and 10% died. No variable was associated with severe infection or death. Among control patients more than 65 years old, 0.5% developed severe infections, 2% developed cancer, and 2% died. Among control patients less than 65 years old, 2.6% developed severe infections, none developed tumors, and 1% died. Conclusions Patients older than 65 years treated with TNF inhibitors for IBD have a high rate of severe infections and mortality compared with younger patients or patients of the same age that did not receive these therapeutics. The effects of anti-TNF agents in older patients with IBD should be more thoroughly investigated, because these patients have higher mortality related to hospitalization than younger patients.
Introduction:
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) represent a chronic inflammatory condition of the bowel that often require lifelong medical therapy for the induction and maintenance of ...the remission. Mesalazine therapies are available both as oral delayed-release and sustained-release formulation, topical formulations and as prodrug.
Areas covered:
Available literature regarding mesalazine is extensively reviewed in this article, covering its mechanism of action, pharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability in different settings.
Expert opinion:
Mesalazine has a well-established role in the management of UC. It is the treatment of choice in active and inactive mild-to-moderate UC combining oral and topical drug. No clear role of mesalazine in prevention of colon cancer has been demonstrated because of the contradictory results coming from case-control and prospective studies. The role of mesalazine in the management of CD is less clear; some studies suggest a potential efficacy of 5-ASA in preventing relapse of CD after surgical resection but more convincing results are needed.
Abstract The two main forms of intestinal bowel disease, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, are not curable but can be controlled by various medical therapies. The Italian Group for the ...Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD) has prepared clinical practice guidelines to help physicians prescribe corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs for these patients. The guidelines consider therapies that induce remission in patients with active disease as well as treatment regimens that maintain remission. These guidelines complement already existing guidelines from IG-IBD on the use of biological drugs in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
To review the available evidence of chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Computerized bibliographic searches with MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases from 1980 through 2000 ...were supplemented with manual searches, with the keywords "hepatocellular carcinoma," "liver cell carcinoma," "randomized controlled trial RCT," and "chemoembolization." Studies were included if patients with unresectable HCC were enrolled and if they were RCTs in which chemoembolization was compared with nonactive treatment (five RCTs) or if different transarterial modalities of therapy (13 RCTs) were compared. Data were extracted from each RCT according to the intention-to-treat method. Five of the RCTs with a nonactive treatment arm were combined by using the random-effects model, whereas all 18 RCTs were pooled from meta-regression analysis.
Chemoembolization significantly reduced the overall 2-year mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.89; P =.015) compared with nonactive treatment. Analysis of comparative RCTs helped to predict that overall mortality was significantly lower in patients treated with transarterial embolization (TAE) than in those treated with transarterial chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.98; P =.039) and that there is no evidence that transarterial chemoembolization is more effective than TAE (odds ratio, 1.007; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.27; P =.95), which suggests that the addition of an anticancer drug did not improve the therapeutic benefit.
In patients with unresectable HCC, chemoembolization significantly improved the overall 2-year survival compared with nonactive treatment, but the magnitude of the benefit is relatively small.
Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require proactive monitoring both during the active phase to evaluate therapeutic response and during the remission phase to evaluate relapse or ...colorectal cancer surveillance. However, monitoring may vary between patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), with distinct tools and intervals.
This narrative review aims to focus on modern approaches to IBD monitoring, considering international guidelines and expert consensus.
The most recent European diagnostic guidelines advocate a combination of clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and radiological parameters to evaluate the disease course of patients with IBD. Unfortunately, the conventional symptom-based therapeutic approach does not improve long-term outcomes and there is no single ideal biomarker available. Endoscopy plays a key role in evaluating response to therapy as well as monitoring disease activity. Recently, bedside intestinal ultrasound (IUS) has gained increasing interest and diffusion as it appears to offer several advantages including the monitoring of therapeutic response.
In light of growing clinical advances, we present a schematic evidence-based monitoring algorithm that can be easily applied in clinical practice which combines all major monitoring modalities, including noninvasive tools such as IUS and video-capsule endoscopy.
Anti-TNF therapies infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) are approved for treating moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). In UC, only the switch from IFX to ADA has been ...investigated, reaching no more than 10–43% remission rates at 12 months.
Of the present study was to investigate disease outcome after a switch from subcutaneous (SC) agents to the intravenous (IV) agent (IFX).
In this retrospective multicentre study, we analysed the charts of UC patients unresponsive/intolerant or with secondary loss of response (LOR) to ADA or GOL who were switched to IFX. We evaluated clinical response and remission together with adverse events at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up.
Seventy-six patients were included; 38 patients started ADA and 38 started GOL for a mean therapy duration of 6 ± 6 months. Indications for switch were adverse events in 3%, primary failure in 79%, and LOR in 18% of patients. Clinical remission was reached by 47%, 50%, and 77% of patients, respectively. Patients that switched for LOR did numerically, but not statistically, better than patients who switched for primary failure.
Our data show a superior remission rate in SC to IV anti-TNF switch in UC compared to the IV to SC switch reported in literature.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
