Autor analizira ratifikaciju Istanbulske konvencije u Hrvatskoj 2018. Nakon uvodnog prikaza temeljnih teorijskih i metodologijskih postavki, prvi dio članka analizira tekst Konvencije. Drugi dio ...članka analizira njezinu političku recepciju u hrvatskoj javnosti uoči, tijekom i nakon ratifikacije. Pritom se diskursi koji su se sučeljavali i surađivali uspostavljaju induktivno, na osnovi uočavanja ponavljajućih sličnosti i razlika u istupima različitih aktera u javnim medijima. Nakon analize diskurzivnih okvira rasprave, prikazuju se institucionalni i izvaninstitucionalni aspekti procesa ratifikacije koji se odigrao unutar tih okvira. Naglasak se stavlja na sklapanje diskurzivne koalicije zastupnika dominantnog diskursa o nasilju nad ženama i diskursa o obiteljskoj tradiciji koji je, uz interpretativnu izjavu, omogućio ratifikaciju Konvencije.
The author analyzes the case of ratification of the Istanbul convention in Croatia in 2018. After introductory explanations of the basic theoretical and methodological conditions of the analysis, the first part of the article analyzes the text of the convention. The second part of the article analyzes its political reception in Croatian public at the time before, during and after its ratification. In doing so, it inductively establishes the discourses that both clashed and collaborated, on the basis of repetitive similarities and differences in the utterances that different actors made in the public media. After the discursive framework of the debate is analyzed, the institutional and non-institutional aspects of the ratification process that took place within these framework are presented. Emphasis is placed on the formation of a discursive coalition between advocates of the dominant discourse on violence against women and the discourse on family tradition that, with the interpretive statement, enabled the ratification of the convention.
Ideology and Truth Petković, Krešimir
Političke perspektive (Beograd ),
05/2019, Volume:
8, Issue:
3
Journal Article
Peer reviewed
Open access
The author argues that any discourse analysis, as well as other approaches in social sciences and humanities, cannot ultimately avoid the truth and ideology distinction. The first part of the article ...provides several glimpses at the Western philosophical tradition that preserves the value of truth. In the second part, an idea for political science, grounded in such a history of ideas, is sketched. After a brief discussion of what is ideology as opposed to truth, the author proposes a thesis about ideology, identity and power, and several heuristic ideas how to develop it. In the third part, he briefly provides examples from political and policy analysis that correspond to such a project. In the final part, he explains the importance of preserving the distinction between ideology and truth in the discursively postulated “post-truth” era. This combination of epistemology, science, analysis and teleology is reflected together in one political area of utmost importance for political science operating in the public sphere: the politics of naming.
Autor tvrdi da svaka analiza diskursa, kao i drugi pristupi u društvenim i humanističkim znanostima, ne mogu u konačnici izbjeći razlikovanje istine i ideologije. Prvi dio članka daje nekoliko pogleda na zapadnu filozofijsku tradiciju koja čuva vrijednost istine. U drugom dijelu, skicirana je ideja političke znanosti, utemeljena na takvoj povijesti ideja. Nakon kratke rasprave o tome što je ideologija nasuprot istini, autor predlaže tezu o ideologiji, identitetu i moći, te nekoliko heurističkih ideja kako je razviti. U trećem dijelu ukratko se navode primjeri iz političke analize i analize javnih politika koji odgovaraju takvom projektu. U posljednjem se dijelu objašnjava važnost očuvanja razlike između ideologije i istine u diskurzivno postavljenoj eri „post-istine“. Ova kombinacija epistemologije, znanosti, analize i teleologije ogleda se zajedno u političkom području od najveće važnosti za političku znanost koja djeluje u javnoj sferi: politici imenovanja.
This critical essay deals with the book Can Democracy Work? by James Miller, which, warning of the problems of democratic politics, retains democratic faith. By combining political science and ...historiography, and intertwining the history of ideas with political biography in portraying different episodes in the history of democracy, the book seeks to give insight into the riddle of democracy. This riddle is exhibited in various theoretical and practical tensions: between the Rousseauian demand for sovereignty of the people and the general will on the one hand, and the Platonistic epistemic skepticism about the ability of the people to decide and the political demands of liberalism on the other; between the need to control the rulers and the political-economic dynamics of corruption and clientelism incited by democratic politics; between rebellion against the elites as a species of functional political hygiene in a polity, and uncertainty of outcomes brought by the inherent instability of democracy and its aptitude to excess; and between the seeming inevitability of elections and their cooptational trap. Between the liberalism of fear à la Judith Shklar and the thrills of populism à la Chantal Mouffe, the author retains democratic faith – a political version of Kierkegaardian existentialism which goes beyond the undecided, forever doubting reflection and a political good that is shared with others, in spite of the uncertainties of public opinion and the ascertained questionability of civic virtue in the open field of the political in history.
U tekstu se ispituju mogućnosti artikulacije političkog otpora u Hrvatskoj kojiautor naziva “protubriselskom revolucijom”. Prvi dio teksta razjašnjava odnoskulturne i protubirokratske revolucije u ...kontekstu odnosa političkih elita scjelinom političkog tijela. Drugi dio prikazuje i objašnjava uporabu sintagme“protubirokratska revolucija” u analizama politologinje Mirjane Kasapovićkoje daju povijesno poučne uvide o odnosu institucionalnog i izvaninstitucionalnogpolitičkog djelovanja potrebne za analizu pojave protubriselske revolucijeu Hrvatskoj. Treći dio teksta donosi kratak prikaz i tipologizaciju šest paradigmatskih epizoda vezanih uz prosvjednu, referendumsku i protureferendumsku politiku koje se mogu podvesti pod pojmovno polje studijârevolucijâ i koje predstavljaju prethodnicu protubriselske revolucije kao političkogdogađaja u području smisla za moguće. Zaključuje se kako je protubriselska revolucija oblik protubirokratske revolucije u nastajanju.
The text examines the possibilities of articulating the political resistance in Croatia, which the author calls the “anti-Brussels revolution”. The first part of the text clarifies the relationship between cultural and anti-bureaucratic revolution in the context of the relationship between political elites and the body politic. The second part presents and explains the use of the phrase anti-bureaucratic revolution in the analyses of Mirjana Kasapović, a political scientist, which provide historically instructive insights into the relationship between institutional and extra-institutional political activity necessary for the analysis of the emergence of the anti-Brussels revolution in Croatia. The third part of the text provides a brief presentation and typologization of six paradigmatic episodes related to protest, referendum and counter-referendum politics. These episodes can be subsumed under the conceptual field of revolution studies and represent a precursor to the anti-Brussels revolution as a political event in the realm of the sense of the possible. It is concluded that the anti-Brussels revolution is a form of emerging anti-bureaucratic revolution.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, ODKLJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
The text examines the possibilities of articulating the political resistance in Croatia, which the author calls the “anti-Brussels revolution”. The first part of the text clarifies the relationship ...between cultural and anti-bureaucratic revolution in the context of the relationship between political elites and the body politic. The second part presents and explains the use of the phrase anti-bureaucratic revolution in the analyses of Mirjana Kasapović, a political scientist, which provide historically instructive insights into the relationship between institutional and extra-institutional political activity necessary for the analysis of the emergence of the anti-Brussels revolution in Croatia. The third part of the text provides a brief presentation and typologization of six paradigmatic episodes related to protest, referendum and counter-referendum politics. These episodes can be subsumed under the conceptual field of revolution studies and represent a precursor to the anti-Brussels revolution as a political event in the realm of the sense of the possible. It is concluded that the anti-Brussels revolution is a form of emerging anti-bureaucratic revolution.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, ODKLJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Ovogodišnje Hrvatske politološke razgovore, održane 4. i 5. studenog – u deset paralelnih panela s ukupno oko 45 prijavljenih izlagača što, s obzirom na institut suizlaganja,
dođe na oko 35 ...prijavljenih izlaganja – obilježila je povijest.
Kritika je sastavni dio racionalnog procesa napretka prema potpunijoj i preciznijoj spoznaji. Posljedično tome, ona subjektima donosi mogućnosti za bolje i učinkovitije djelovanje na pojedinačnoj i ...kolektivnoj razini. Postavke prosvjetiteljskog svjetonazora obuhvaćaju viziju napretka znanosti kao kolektivnog procesa otvorenog nagađanja i opovrgavanja ili barem progresivnog djelovanja unutar određene paradigme do njezina iscrpljivanja i prevladavanja. Premda se društvene znanosti ponekad čine kulturno omeđenima i politički uvjetovanima kontekstualnim vrednovanjima kojima nedostaje paradigmatski status, navedene postavke načelno vrijede i za njih. To se ponekad naziva pozitivizmom – načelnim jedinstvom metode prirodnih i društvenih znanosti. Stoga su društveni znanstvenici, kao i oni prirodni, običajno i institucionalno izloženi kritici svojih teza: na znanstvenim skupovima, u akademskoj i široj javnosti ili pak kroz procese anonimnog recenziranja njihovih članaka i knjiga. Kritika dolazi od drugih, ponekad dobronamjernih, ponekad manje dobronamjernih kolega, ali u široj slici, bez sumnje vođenih naznačenom vizijom znanstvenog i povijesnog napretka.
PDF
