Abstract
Objective:
To provide an understanding of the detrimental impact of cirrhosis and its complications, strengths and weaknesses of current treatment options for the management of these ...complications, and new developments in this rapidly changing field.
Research design and methods:
Relevant publications were identified via PubMed and Cochrane databases, with additional references obtained by reviewing bibliographies from selected articles.
Results:
Cirrhosis, a progressive liver disease, is characterized by fibrosis caused by chronic liver injury. Liver fibrosis impairs hepatic function and causes structural changes that result in portal hypertension. Most patients with cirrhosis remain asymptomatic until they develop decompensated cirrhosis. At this stage, patients experience complications associated with portal hypertension (i.e., the abnormal increase in portal vein pressure), including ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), hepatic encephalopathy (HE), hepatorenal syndrome, portopulmonary hypertension, or variceal bleeding. In addition, intestinal microbial translocation in patients with cirrhosis might also cause SBP and HE. Because the survival rate for patients with cirrhosis substantially decreases once complications develop, the key goals in treating patients with cirrhosis include both managing the underlying liver disease and preventing and treating related complications. In patients with compensated cirrhosis, the management strategy is to prevent variceal bleeding and other complications that can lead to decompensated cirrhosis. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis are typically referred for liver transplantation, and the main focus of pre-transplant management is to eliminate the cause of cirrhosis (e.g., excess alcohol consumption, hepatitis virus) and prevent the recurrence of each decompensating complication.
Conclusions:
Although substantial progress has been made to prevent the complications and mortality associated with cirrhosis, liver transplantation in combination with resolution of the etiology of cirrhosis remains the only curative option for most patients. Emerging therapies such as anti-fibrotic agents hold promise in potentially halting or reversing the progression of cirrhosis, even in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Summary Background Interferon-based treatment is not suitable for many patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection because of contraindications such as psychiatric illness, and a high burden of ...adverse events. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free regimen—a fixed-dose combination of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (400 mg) and the HCV NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (90 mg), with and without ribavirin—in patients with genotype-1 hepatitis C infection who were treatment-naive or previously treated with a protease-inhibitor regimen. Methods For this open-label study, we enrolled 100 adult patients (>18 years) with HCV infection at a centre in the USA between Nov 2, 2012, and Dec 21, 2012. In cohort A, we used a computer-generated sequence to randomly assign (1:1:1; stratified by HCV genotype 1a vs 1b) 60 non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive patients to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 8 weeks (group 1), sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and ribavirin for 8 weeks (group 2), or sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks (group 3). In cohort B, we randomly allocated (1:1; stratified by genotype and presence or absence of cirrhosis) 40 patients who previously had virological failure after receiving a protease inhibitor regimen to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks (group 4) or sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks (group 5). 22 (55%) of 40 patients in cohort B had compensated cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01726517. Findings In cohort A, SVR12 was achieved by 19 (95%) of 20 patients (95% CI 75–100) in group 1, by 21 (100%) of 21 patients (84–100) in group 2, and by 18 (95%) of 19 patients (74–100) in group 3. In cohort B, SVR12 was achieved by 18 (95%) of 19 patients (74–100) in group 4 and by all 21 (100%) of 21 patients (84–100) in group 5. Two patients had viral relapse; one patient was lost to follow-up after achieving sustained virological response 8 weeks after treatment. The most common adverse events were nausea, anaemia, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. One patient in group five had a serious adverse event of anaemia, thought to be related to ribavirin treatment. Interpretation These findings suggest that the fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone or with ribavirin has the potential to cure most patients with genotype-1 HCV, irrespective of treatment history or the presence of compensated cirrhosis. Further clinical trials are needed to establish the best treatment duration and to further assess the contribution of ribavirin. Funding Gilead Sciences.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
In this phase 2 study, peginterferon-free regimens were effective in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis, ...liver cancer, and end-stage liver disease.
1
The current standard of care for chronic HCV genotype 1 infection is pegylated interferon (peginterferon) and ribavirin, with a protease inhibitor (boceprevir or telaprevir).
2
Although the addition of a protease inhibitor has been associated with a significant increase in response rates, only approximately one third of patients who had not had a response to prior therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin had a sustained virologic response when re-treated with the addition of a protease inhibitor.
3
,
4
Furthermore, these therapies are associated with adverse . . .
Background & Aims Rifaximin is a gut-selective, oral antimicrobial agent shown to reduce the recurrence of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and HE-related hospitalizations in a 6-month, randomized, ...controlled trial (RCT). We performed a phase 3, open-label maintenance study to assess the safety and rate of hospitalization with long-term rifaximin use. Methods We conducted a 24-month, open-label maintenance study of rifaximin (550 mg, twice daily) in patients with HE who participated in the previous RCT of rifaximin or new patients enrolled from March 2007 to December 2010. Safety was assessed (adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters) for the integrated population of all patients, who were given rifaximin 550 mg twice daily (all-rifaximin population, N = 392). Safety and hospitalization data were compared between the group given placebo in the original RCT (n = 159) and those given rifaximin (n = 140). Results In the all-rifaximin population, the median exposure to rifaximin was 427.0 days (range, 2–1427 d), with 510.5 person-years of exposure. The profile and rate of adverse events with long-term rifaximin treatment were similar to those of the original RCT. There was no increase in the rate of infections, including with Clostridium difficile , or development of bacterial antibiotic resistance. Rates of hospitalizations with long-term rifaximin administration remained low: the HE-related hospitalization rate, normalized for exposure (0.21; all-rifaximin population), was similar to that of the rifaximin group in the original RCT (0.30), and lower than that for the placebo group (0.72). Conclusions Long-term treatment (≥24 mo) with rifaximin (550 mg, twice daily) appears to provide a continued reduction in the rate of HE-related and all-cause hospitalization, without an increased rate of adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00686920.
In patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis, the rate of sustained virologic response was 92% with three new antiviral agents plus ribavirin for 12 weeks and 96% with the same regimen for ...24 weeks. Two percent of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events.
An estimated 184 million people worldwide have hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection,
1
a leading cause of chronic liver disease and the leading indication for liver transplantation globally.
2
,
3
Approximately 25% of persons with HCV infection in the United States have cirrhosis, and this number is expected to rise to 37% by 2020.
4
,
5
Eradication of HCV with antiviral therapy reduces the risk of hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death from a liver-related cause or any cause.
6
–
10
Among patients with HCV infection and cirrhosis in whom peginterferon–ribavirin treatment has failed, rates of sustained virologic response to retreatment with interferon-containing regimens . . .
Summary Background Protease inhibitors have improved treatment of infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but dosing, a low barrier to resistance, drug interactions, and side-effects restrict their ...use. We assessed the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir, a uridine nucleotide analogue, in treatment-naive patients with genotype 1–3 HCV infection. Methods In this two-cohort, phase 2 trial, we recruited treatment-naive patients with HCV genotypes 1–3 from 22 centres in the USA. All patients were recruited between Aug 16, 2010, and Dec 13, 2010, and were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18–70 years, had an HCV RNA concentration of 50 000 IU/mL or greater, and had no cirrhosis. We randomly allocated all eligible patients with HCV genotype 1 (cohort A) to receive sofosbuvir 200 mg, sofosbuvir 400 mg, or placebo (2:2:1) for 12 weeks in combination with peginterferon (180 μg per week) and ribavirin (1000–1200 mg daily), after which they continued peginterferon and ribavirin for an additional 12 weeks or 36 weeks (depending on viral response). Randomisation was done by use of a computer-generated randomisation sequence and patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until week 12. Patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (cohort B) received open-label sofosbuvir 400 mg plus peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks. Our primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary efficacy analyses were by intention to treat and endpoints included sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at post-treatment weeks 12 and 24. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01188772. Findings In cohort A, 122 patients were assigned 200 mg sofosbuvir (48 patients), 400 mg sofosbuvir (48), or placebo (26). We enrolled 25 patients into cohort B. The most common adverse events—fatigue, headache, nausea, and chills—were consistent with those associated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Eight patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events, two (4%) receiving sofosbuvir 200 mg, three (6%) receiving sofosbuvir 400 mg, and three (12%) receiving placebo. In cohort A, HCV RNA was undetectable at post-treatment week 12 in 43 (90%; 95% CI 77–97) of 48 patients in the 200 mg sofosbuvir group; 43 (91%; 80–98) of 47 patients in the 400 mg sofosbuvir group, and 15 (58%; 37–77) of 26 patients in the placebo group. In cohort B, 23 (92%) of 25 patients had undetectable HCV RNA at post-treatment week 12. Interpretation Our findings lend support to the further assessment, in phase 2 and 3 trials, of sofosbuvir 400 mg plus peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype-1. Funding Gilead Sciences.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
In this trial in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and no cirrhosis who had previously been treated with peginterferon and ribavirin, retreatment with three new oral antiviral agents and ...ribavirin resulted in a sustained virologic response in 96% of patients.
Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are at risk for progressive liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, and decompensated liver disease. HCV infection can be cured with antiviral therapy, reducing the risk of illness and death associated with end-stage liver disease.
1
–
3
For more than a decade, patients with HCV genotype 1 infection have been treated with peginterferon–ribavirin dual therapy, resulting in rates of sustained virologic response of approximately 40 to 50%.
4
–
6
Response rates among previously untreated patients have been shown to increase to 68 to 75% with peginterferon–ribavirin plus a protease inhibitor (telaprevir or boceprevir, . . .
In this trial involving patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 in whom previous treatment had failed, boceprevir plus peginterferon and ribavirin was more effective than ...peginterferon and ribavirin alone. Adverse effects of boceprevir included anemia and neutropenia.
More than 170 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) worldwide.
1
The standard treatment is combination therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin.
2
–
4
Of the six HCV genotypes, genotype 1 is the least responsive to currently approved therapies, with rates of sustained virologic response of less than 50%.
2
,
5
–
7
Thus, there is a large population of patients with few therapeutic options, and direct-acting antiviral therapy has become the focus of investigations regarding treatment for HCV infection.
8
–
11
Boceprevir is a structurally novel peptidomimetic ketoamide protease inhibitor that binds reversibly to the HCV nonstructural 3 (NS3) active site. . . .
In this preliminary study, a combination of a protease inhibitor, a nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor, and ribavirin was effective for the treatment of HCV genotype 1 infection.
Hepatitis C virus ...(HCV) infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis, liver cancer, and liver transplantation. Peginterferon-free regimens of direct-acting antiviral agents have the potential to improve both the safety and efficacy of HCV therapy, as compared with the current standard treatment of peginterferon and ribavirin with telaprevir or boceprevir.
1
,
2
Interferon is associated with substantial toxicity, and many patients with HCV infection are not eligible for interferon therapy owing to coexisting medical or psychiatric conditions or adverse events related to interferon, or they decline such therapy.
3
,
4
There is also a large population of HCV-infected patients in whom interferon . . .
PDF
