The clinical efficacy and safety of cefixime (CFIX), a new oral cephalosporin, were com pared with those of cefroxadine (CXD) in patients sufferring from acute lacunar tonsillitis in a double blind ...study. Two hundred and fifty two patients were given each orally 100mg of CFIX b.i.d. or 250 mg of CXD t.i.d. for, in principle, 7 days. Number of patients evaluated for clinical efficacy was 202 (103 treated with CFIX and 99 treated with CXD). As for the backgrounds of patients, more severe cases were found in the CFIX group than in the CXD group (P< 0.01). Efficacy rates evaluated by individual doctors were 88.3% in the CFIX group and 91.9% in the CXD group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Efficacy rates on the third day after the initiation of treatment evaluated by the committee were 40.8% in the CFIX group and 47.9% in the CXD group with no significant difference. Efficacy rate on the 7th day, however, was 79.8% in the CFIX group and 93.4% in the CXD group, showing a significant difference (P<0.05). Bacteriological effectivenesses were satisfactory for both groups with eradication rates of 93.4% for the CFIX and 96.9% for the CXD group. Number of patients evaluated for safety was 226 (110 treated with CFIX and 116 treated with CXD). No significant difference was observed between the 2 drug groups in incidences of side effects; gastrointestinal disturbances or rashes were noted in 6 patients (5.5%) of the CFIX group and in 5 patients (4.3%) of the CXD group. As for the abnormal laboratory findings, elevation of GOT & GPT was observed in 1 patient of the CFIX group. From these results, it was concluded that 100 mg b.i.d. of CFIX was as useful as 250 mg t.i.d. of CXD in the treatment of acute lacunar tonsillitis.
A double blind study was carried out to compare the efficacy and safety of cefixime (CFIX), a new oral cephem with cefaclor (CCL) in the treatment of 245 children weighing 10-30 kg, with acute ...suppurative otitis media. The daily dosages of CFIX and CCL were 3-6 mg/kg in 2 divided portions, and 20-40mg/kg in 3 divided portions, respectively, and the drugs were administered for 7 days. The results obtained in this study are summarized as follows. 1. Analyzed subjects were 211 patients (CFIX group: 108 patients, CCL group: 103 patients) for clinical efficacy. Efficacy rates judged by the doctor in charge were 88.9% and 83.5% in CFIX and CCL group, respectively, without significant difference between the 2 groups. Similar results were also obtained by the committee. 2. When clinical effects were classified by clinical isolates, the efficacy rates against monomicrobial infections with Gram-negative bacteria were judged by the doctor in charge to be 100% in the CFIX group and 84.6% in the CCL group. Thus CFIX was judged to be significantly superior to CCL (P < 0.05). 3. The overall eradication rates of bacteria were 97.1% in the CFIX group and 90.3% in the CCL group. The eradication rate of CFIX was significantly superior to that of CCL (P < 0.05). 4. When improvements of individual symptoms were evaluated, regarding redness of the tympanic membrane and the tympanic cavity on the 3rd day of dosing, CFIX group (improvement in 84.1% of the cases) was significantly superior (P<0.05) to the CCL group (67.6%). Regarding purulent secretion on the 7th day of dosing, the CFIX group (improvementin 98.1% of the cases) was also significantly superior (P<0.05) to the CCL group (91.3%). 5. Two hundred thirty eight patients were analyzed for side effects (CFIX group: 120 patients, CCL group: 118 patients). The incidence rates of side effects were 0.8% (1/120) in the CFIX group and 1.7% (2/118) in the CCL group, and there was no significant difference between the 2 drugs. From the above results, it is concluded that CFIX is a useful oral antibiotic in the treatment of acute suppurative otitis media in chicken. Furthermore, CFIX is expected to be equal or superior to CCL in clinical effects.
