Resistance to BRAF inhibitors is an emerging problem in the melanoma field. Strategies to prevent and overcome resistance are urgently required.
The dynamics of cell signalling, BrdU incorporation ...and cell-cycle entry after BRAF inhibition was measured using flow cytometry and western blot. The ability of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition to prevent the emergence of resistance was demonstrated by apoptosis and colony formation assays and in 3D organotypic cell culture.
BRAF inhibition led to a rapid recovery of phospho-ERK (pERK) signalling. Although most of the cells remained growth arrested in the presence of drug, a minor population of cells retained their proliferative potential and escaped from BRAF inhibitor therapy. A function for the rebound pERK signalling in therapy escape was demonstrated by the ability of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition to enhance the levels of apoptosis and abrogate the onset of resistance.
Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition may be one strategy to prevent the emergence of drug resistance in BRAF-V600E-mutated melanomas.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
In recent years, melanoma has become a poster-child for the development of oncogene-directed targeted therapies. This approach, which has been exemplified by the development of small-molecule BRAF ...inhibitors and the BRAF/MEK inhibitor combination for BRAF-mutant melanoma, has brought new hope to patients. Despite these successes, treatment failure seems near inevitable in the majority of cases—even in individuals treated with the BRAF/MEK inhibitor doublet. In the current review, we discuss the future of combination strategies for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma as well as the emerging therapeutic options for patients with NRAS-mutant and BRAF/NRAS-wild-type melanoma. We also outline some of the newest developments in the in-depth personalisation of therapy that should allow melanoma treatment to continue shaping the field precision cancer medicine.
Full text
Available for:
DOBA, EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, IZUM, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5–7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 ...leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment for brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of metastatic melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
•A melanoma consensus conference, organised by the ESMO Guidelines Committee, was attended by 32 experts from 14 countries•The experts compiled recommendations (with supporting evidence) on controversial topics in melanoma management•Recommendations for metastatic melanoma in this manuscript include the following:○targeted versus immunotherapy○treatment sequencing and duration○management of brain metastases•A separate manuscript presenting results relating to the management of locoregional melanoma is also available
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
The mechanisms by which some melanoma cells adapt to Serine/threonine-protein kinase B-Raf (BRAF) inhibitor therapy are incompletely understood. In the present study, we used mass spectrometry-based ...phosphoproteomics to determine how BRAF inhibition remodeled the signaling network of melanoma cell lines that were BRAF mutant and PTEN null. Short-term BRAF inhibition was associated with marked changes in fibronectin-based adhesion signaling that were PTEN dependent. These effects were recapitulated through BRAF siRNA knockdown and following treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs. Increased fibronectin expression was also observed in mouse xenograft models as well as specimens from melanoma patients undergoing BRAF inhibitor treatment. Analysis of a melanoma tissue microarray showed loss of PTEN expression to predict for a lower overall survival, with a trend for even lower survival being seen when loss of fibronectin was included in the analysis. Mechanistically, the induction of fibronectin limited the responses of these PTEN-null melanoma cell lines to vemurafenib, with enhanced cytotoxicity observed following the knockdown of either fibronectin or its receptor α5β1 integrin. This in turn abrogated the cytotoxic response to BRAF inhibition via increased AKT signaling, which prevented the induction of cell death by maintaining the expression of the pro-survival protein Mcl-1. The protection conveyed by the induction of FN expression could be overcome through combined treatment with a BRAF and PI3K inhibitor.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a consensus conference on melanoma on 5–7 September 2019 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 ...leading experts in the management of melanoma. The aim of the conference was to develop recommendations on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline and where available evidence is either limited or conflicting. The main topics identified for discussion were: (i) the management of locoregional disease; (ii) targeted versus immunotherapies in the adjuvant setting; (iii) targeted versus immunotherapies for the first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma; (iv) when to stop immunotherapy or targeted therapy in the metastatic setting; and (v) systemic versus local treatment of brain metastases. The expert panel was divided into five working groups in order to each address questions relating to one of the five topics outlined above. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This manuscript presents the results relating to the management of locoregional melanoma, including findings from the expert panel discussions, consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.
•A melanoma consensus conference, organised by the ESMO Guidelines Committee, was attended by 32 experts from 14 countries•The experts compiled recommendations (with supporting evidence) on controversial topics in melanoma management•Recommendations for locoregional melanoma in this manuscript include:○indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy and radical lymph node dissection○adjuvant targeted versus immunotherapy○adjuvant therapy in specific situations (after node dissection, stage IIIA, resected stage IV, in-transit metastasis)○adjuvant therapy toxicity management•A separate manuscript presenting results relating to the management of metastaticmelanoma is also available
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Vaccine alternatives to high-dose interferon alfa-2b therapy (HDI), the current standard adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma, are of interest because of toxicity associated with HDI. The GM2 ...ganglioside is a well-defined melanoma antigen, and anti-GM2 antibodies have been associated with improved prognosis. We conducted a prospective, randomized, intergroup trial to evaluate the efficacy of HDI for 1 year versus vaccination with GM2 conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and administered with QS-21 (GMK) for 96 weeks (weekly x 4 then every 12 weeks x 8).
Eligible patients had resected stage IIB/III melanoma. Patients were stratified by sex and number of positive nodes. Primary end points were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).
Eight hundred eighty patients were randomized (440 per treatment group); 774 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The trial was closed after interim analysis indicated inferiority of GMK compared with HDI. For eligible patients, HDI provided a statistically significant RFS benefit (hazard ratio HR = 1.47, P = .0015) and OS benefit (HR = 1.52, P = .009) for GMK versus HDI. Similar benefit was observed in the intent-to-treat analysis (RFS HR = 1.49; OS HR = 1.38). HDI was associated with a treatment benefit in all subsets of patients with zero to > or = four positive nodes, but the greatest benefit was observed in the node-negative subset (RFS HR = 2.07; OS HR = 2.71 eligible population). Antibody responses to GM2 (ie, titers > or = 1:80) at days 29, 85, 365, and 720 were associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS (P2 = .068 at day 29).
This trial demonstrated a significant treatment benefit of HDI versus GMK in terms of RFS and OS in melanoma patients at high risk of recurrence.
Pivotal trial E1684 of adjuvant high-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNalpha2b) therapy in high-risk melanoma patients demonstrated a significant relapse-free and overall survival (RFS and OS) benefit ...compared with observation (Obs).
A prospective, randomized, three-arm, intergroup trial evaluated the efficacy of high-dose IFNalpha2b (HDI) for 1 year and low-dose IFNalpha2b (LDI) for 2 years versus Obs in high-risk (stage IIB and III) melanoma with RFS and OS end points.
A total of 642 patients were enrolled (608 patients eligible), of whom a majority (75%) had nodal metastasis (50% had nodal recurrence). Unlike E1684, E1690 allowed entry of patients with T4 (> 4 mm) deep primary tumors, regardless of nodal dissection, and 25% of the patients entered onto this trial had deep primary tumors (compared with 11% in E1684). At 52 months' median follow-up, HDI demonstrated an RFS benefit exceeding that of LDI compared with Obs. The 5-year estimated RFS rates for the HDI, LDI, and Obs arms were 44%, 40%, and 35%, respectively. The hazards ratio for the intent-to-treat analysis of HDI versus Obs was 1.28 (P(2) =.05); for LDI versus Obs, it was 1.19 (P(2) =.17). By Cox analysis, the impact of HDI on RFS achieved significance (P(2) =.03). The RFS benefit was equivalent for node-negative and node-positive patients. Neither HDI nor LDI has demonstrated an OS benefit compared with Obs at this time. A major improvement in the median OS of patients in the E1690 Obs arm was noted in comparison with E1684 (6 years v 2.8 years). An analysis of salvage therapy for patients who relapsed on E1690 demonstrated that a significantly larger proportion of patients in the Obs arm received IFNalpha-containing salvage therapy compared with the HDI arm; this therapy was unavailable to patients during E1684, and patients with undissected regional nodes were not included in E1684. This study did not specify therapy at recurrence. Analysis of treatments received at recurrence demonstrated significantly more frequent use of IFNalpha2b at relapse from Obs than from HDI, which may have confounded interpretation of the survival benefit of assigned treatments in E1690.
The results of the intergroup E1690 trial demonstrate an RFS benefit of IFNalpha2b that is dose-dependent and significant for HDI by Cox multivariable analysis.
Introduction
The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) Staging Manual provides important information for staging and prognostication; however, survival estimates for ...patients with Stage I–III Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rare disease, may be as practical using data from large-volume centers as that collated for the AJCC analysis. As such, we compared our institutional outcomes to AJCC8.
Methods
Patients who presented from 2005 to 2017 with MCC to two high-volume centers were included. Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, survival and recurrence data were compiled, and outcomes compared to AJCC8.
Results
A total of 409 patients were included. Median age was 75 (range 29–98) years, and 68% were male. Median follow-up was 16 months (0–157). Five-year overall survival (OS) was 70%; 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 84%. When stratified by extent of disease, 5-year OS was higher for patients with local disease compared to those with nodal disease (72.6% vs 62.7%, p=0.005). Similarly, patients with local disease had higher 5-year DSS than those with nodal disease (90.1% vs 76.8%, p=0.002). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 59.2% for all patients, 65.0% for local disease and 48.3% for nodal disease (p=0.033).
Conclusions
Here, MCC patients with local or nodal disease have substantially higher OS rates than predicted in AJCC8 (5-year: 72.6% vs 50.6%; 62.7% vs 35.4%, respectively). Importantly, 5-year DSS was significantly better than the OS rates reported presently and in AJCC8. As clinicians and patients rely on AJCC to accurately prognosticate and guide treatment decisions, these estimates should be reassessed and updated to more accurately predict survival outcomes.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
Preclinical
and in vitro studies have determined that copper is an
important cofactor for angiogenesis. Tetrathiomolybdate (TM) was
developed as an effective anticopper therapy for the initial ...treatment
of Wilson’s disease, an autosomal recessive disorder that leads to
abnormal copper accumulation. Given the potency and uniqueness of the
anticopper action of TM and its lack of toxicity, we hypothesized that
TM would be a suitable agent to achieve and maintain mild copper
deficiency to impair neovascularization in metastatic solid tumors.
Following preclinical work that showed efficacy for this anticopper
approach in mouse tumor models, we carried out a Phase I clinical trial
in 18 patients with metastatic cancer who were enrolled at three dose
levels of oral TM (90, 105, and 120 mg/day) administered in six divided
doses with and in-between meals. Serum ceruloplasmin (Cp) was used as a
surrogate marker for total body copper. Because anemia is the first
clinical sign of copper deficiency, the goal of the study was to reduce
Cp to 20% of baseline value without reducing hematocrit below 80% of
baseline. Cp is a reliable and sensitive measure of copper status, and
TM was nontoxic when Cp was reduced to 15–20% of baseline. The level
III dose of TM (120 mg/day) was effective in reaching the target Cp
without added toxicity. TM-induced mild copper deficiency achieved
stable disease in five of six patients who were copper deficient at the
target range for at least 90 days.
C.R. Farley and M.C. Perez contributed equally to this publication and are co-first authors. J.S. Zager and M.C. Lowe contributed equally to this publication and are co-corresponding authors.
Full text
Available for:
EMUNI, FIS, FZAB, GEOZS, GIS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, MFDPS, NLZOH, NUK, OBVAL, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, SBMB, SBNM, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK, VKSCE, ZAGLJ
PDF
