Pulsed field ablation uses electrical pulses to cause nonthermal irreversible electroporation and induce cardiac cell death. Pulsed field ablation may have effectiveness comparable to traditional ...catheter ablation while preventing thermally mediated complications.
The PULSED AF pivotal study (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF) was a prospective, global, multicenter, nonrandomized, paired single-arm study in which patients with paroxysmal (n=150) or persistent (n=150) symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) refractory to class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs were treated with pulsed field ablation. All patients were monitored for 1 year using weekly and symptomatic transtelephonic monitoring; 3-, 6-, and 12-month ECGs; and 6- and 12-month 24-hour Holter monitoring. The primary effectiveness end point was freedom from a composite of acute procedural failure, arrhythmia recurrence, or antiarrhythmic escalation through 12 months, excluding a 3-month blanking period to allow recovery from the procedure. The primary safety end point was freedom from a composite of serious procedure- and device-related adverse events. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the primary end points.
Pulsed field ablation was shown to be effective at 1 year in 66.2% (95% CI, 57.9 to 73.2) of patients with paroxysmal AF and 55.1% (95% CI, 46.7 to 62.7) of patients with persistent AF. The primary safety end point occurred in 1 patient (0.7%; 95% CI, 0.1 to 4.6) in both the paroxysmal and persistent AF cohorts.
PULSED AF demonstrated a low rate of primary safety adverse events (0.7%) and provided effectiveness consistent with established ablation technologies using a novel irreversible electroporation energy to treat patients with AF.
URL: https://www.
gov; Unique identifier: NCT04198701.
The relationship between Holter electrocardiography (ECG) and atrial fibrillation (AF) diagnosis in the real world has not been widely evaluated in Japan.This is a claims-based retrospective study ...using a health insurance claims database provided by DeSC Healthcare Corporation. We identified patients with at least one Holter for any purpose during the data period from April 2015 to November 2020 and without diagnosis of AF before the tests (n = 19,739). We obtained a whole picture of Holter and AF diagnosis after correcting for population distribution bias in the dataset. Based on this picture and the assumption that the patient had AF at the 1st Holter whose AF was detected for the first time at the second or subsequent Holter, we estimated the number of diagnosis with AF and overlooked AF by initial Holter. We conducted sensitivity analyses changing the definition of AF, the potential detection period, and the washout period (a period required to avoid including patients who have already been diagnosed with AF or who have already undergone several Holters) to confirm the validity of the base scenario.Among patients for analysis, 88.4% had only one Holter. The percentage of AF diagnosis by initial Holter was 7.6%. The percentage of AF overlooked by initial Holter was estimated to be 31.4% and this value did not change much by sensitivity analyses.It was estimated that approximately 30% of AF patients were overlooked by initial Holter, and reducing the overlooked rate will be a clinical challenge.
Permanent cardiac pacing of the His-bundle restores and retains normal electrical activation of the ventricles. Data on His-bundle pacing (HBP) are largely limited to small single-centre reports, and ...clinical benefits and risks have not been systematically examined. We sought to systematically examine published studies of patients undergoing permanent HBP and quantify the benefits and risks of the therapy.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for full-text articles on permanent HBP. Clinical outcomes of interest included implant success rate, procedural and lead complications, pacing thresholds, QRS duration, and ejection fraction at follow-up, and mortality. Data were extracted and summarized. Where possible, meta-analysis of aggregate data was performed. Out of 2876 articles, 26 met the inclusion criteria representing 1438 patients with an implant attempt. Average age of patients was 73 years and 62.1% were implanted due to atrioventricular block. Overall average implant success rate was 84.8% and was higher with use of catheter-delivered systems (92.1%; P < 0.001). Average pacing thresholds were 1.71 V at implant and 1.79 V at >3 months follow-up; although, pulse widths varied at testing. Average left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs) were 42.8% at baseline and 49.5% at follow-up. There were 43 complications observed in 907 patients across the 17 studies that reported safety information.
Among 26 articles of permanent HBP, the implant success rate averaged 84.8% and LVEF improved by an average of 5.9% during follow-up. Specific reporting of our clinical outcomes of interest varied widely, highlighting the need for uniform reporting in future HBP trials.
PDF
