Entecavir (ETV) is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B viral replication, but long‐term therapy may be required. We investigated whether adding on pegylated interferon (Peg‐IFN) to ETV therapy enhances ...serological response rates. In this global investigator‐initiated, open‐label, multicenter, randomized trial, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with compensated liver disease started on ETV monotherapy (0.5 mg/day) and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either Peg‐IFN add‐on therapy (180 µg/week) from week 24 to 48 (n = 85) or to continue ETV monotherapy (n = 90). Response was defined as HBeAg loss with HBV DNA <200 IU/mL at week 48. Responders discontinued ETV at week 72. All patients were followed until week 96. Response was achieved in 16 of 85 (19%) patients allocated to the add‐on arm versus 9 of 90 (10%) in the monotherapy arm (P = 0.095). Adjusted for HBV DNA levels before randomized therapy, Peg‐IFN add‐on was significantly associated with response (odds ratio: 4.8; 95% confidence interval: 1.6‐14.0; P = 0.004). Eleven (13%) of the add‐on‐treated patients achieved disease remission after ETV cessation versus 2 of 90 (2%) of those treated with monotherapy (P = 0.007), which was 79% (11 of 14) versus 25% (2 of 8) of those who discontinued ETV (P = 0.014). At week 96, 22 (26%) patients assigned add‐on versus 12 (13%) assigned monotherapy achieved HBeAg seroconversion (P = 0.036). Peg‐IFN add‐on led to significantly more decline in hepatitis B surface antigen, HBeAg, and HBV DNA (all P < 0.001). Combination therapy was well tolerated. Conclusion: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, 24 weeks of Peg‐IFN add‐on therapy led to a higher proportion of HBeAg response, compared to ETV monotherapy. Add‐on therapy resulted in more viral decline and appeared to prevent relapse after stopping ETV. Hence, Peg‐IFN add‐on therapy may facilitate the discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analogs. (Hepatology 2015;61:1512–1522)
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Peginterferon alfa‐2a results in a sustained response (SR) in a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study investigated the role of early ...on‐treatment serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels in the prediction of SR in HBeAg‐negative patients receiving peginterferon alfa‐2a. HBsAg (Architect from Abbott) was quantified at the baseline and during treatment (weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48) and follow‐up (weeks 60 and 72) in the sera from 107 patients who participated in an international multicenter trial (peginterferon alfa‐2a, n = 53, versus peginterferon alfa‐2a and ribavirin, n = 54). Overall, 24 patients (22%) achieved SR serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA level < 10,000 copies/mL and normal alanine aminotransferase levels at week 72. Baseline characteristics were comparable between sustained responders and nonresponders. From week 8 onward, serum HBsAg levels markedly decreased in sustained responders, whereas only a modest decline was observed in nonresponders. However, HBsAg declines alone were of limited value in the prediction of SR area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) at weeks 4, 8, and 12 = 0.59, 0.56, and 0.69, respectively. Combining the declines in HBsAg and HBV DNA allowed the best prediction of SR (AUC at week 12 = 0.74). None of the 20 patients (20% of the study population) in whom a decrease in serum HBsAg levels was absent and whose HBV DNA levels declined less than 2 log copies/mL exhibited an SR (negative predictive value = 100%). Conclusion: At week 12 of peginterferon alfa‐2a treatment for HBeAg‐negative CHB, a solid stopping rule was established with a combination of declines in serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels from the baseline. Quantitative serum HBsAg in combination with HBV DNA enables on‐treatment adjustments of peginterferon therapy for HBeAg‐negative CHB. (HEPATOLOGY 2010)
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
BACKGROUND—Endovascular infrapopliteal treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia using percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and bail-out bare metal stenting (BMS) is hampered by ...restenosis. In interventional cardiology, drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown better patency rates and are standard practice nowadays. An investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized trial was conducted to assess whether DES also improve patency and clinical outcome of infrapopliteal lesions.
METHODS AND RESULTS—Adults with critical limb ischemia (Rutherford category ≥4) and infrapopliteal lesions were randomized to receive PTA±BMS or DES with paclitaxel. Primary end point was 6-month primary binary patency of treated lesions, defined as ≤50% stenosis on computed tomographic angiography. Stenosis >50%, retreatment, major amputation, and critical limb ischemia–related death were regarded as treatment failure. Severity of failure was assessed with an ordinal score, ranging from vessel stenosis through occlusion to the clinical failures. Seventy-four limbs (73 patients) were treated with DES and 66 limbs (64 patients) received PTA±BMS. Six-month patency rates were 48.0% for DES and 35.1% for PTA±BMS (P=0.096) in the modified-intention-to-treat and 51.9% and 35.1% (P=0.037) in the per-protocol analysis. The ordinal score showed significantly worse treatment failure for PTA±BMS versus DES (P=0.041). The observed major amputation rate remained lower in the DES group until 2 years post-treatment, with a trend toward significance (P=0.066). Less minor amputations occurred after DES until 6 months post-treatment (P=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS—In patients with critical limb ischemia caused by infrapopliteal lesions, DES provide better 6-month patency rates and less amputations after 6 and 12 months compared with PTA±BMS.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION—URLhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifierNCT00471289.
The aim of this open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled study was to investigate whether the life cycle pharma (LCP)-tacrolimus compared with the extended-release (ER)-tacrolimus formulation ...results in a difference in the prevalence of posttransplant diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at 12 mo after liver transplantation.
Patients were 1:1 randomized to either of the 2 tacrolimus formulations. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite endpoint of any of 3 events: sustained (>3 mo postrandomization) posttransplant diabetes, new-onset hypertension, and/or CKD, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m
for >3 m during the follow-up.
In total, 105 patients were included. In the intention-to-treat analysis, a statistically significant lower proportion of liver transplant recipients in the LCP-tacrolimus group reached the composite primary endpoint at 12 mo compared with the ER-tacrolimus group (50.9% 27/53, 95% confidence interval CI, 37.9%-63.9% versus 71.2% 37/52, 95% CI, 57.7%-81.7%; risk difference: 0.202; 95% CI, 0.002-0.382;
= 0.046). No significant difference was found in the per protocol analysis. In the intention-to-treat and per protocol population, fewer liver transplant recipients in the LCP-tacrolimus group developed CKD and new-onset hypertension compared with the ER-tacrolimus group. No differences in rejection rate, graft and patient survival were found.
A statistically significant and clinically relevant reduction in the prevalence of the composite primary endpoint was found in the LCP-tacrolimus group compared with the ER-tacrolimus group in the first year after liver transplantation with comparable efficacy.
To assess whether a combination of adalimumab and ciprofloxacin is superior to adalimumab alone in the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease (CD).
Randomised, double-blind, placebo ...controlled trial in eight Dutch hospitals. In total, 76 CD patients with active perianal fistulising disease were enrolled. After adalimumab induction therapy (160/80 mg week 0, 2), patients received 40 mg every other week together with ciprofloxacin 500 mg or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, adalimumab was continued. Follow-up was 24 weeks. Primary endpoint (clinical response) was defined as 50% reduction of fistulas from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included remission (closure of all fistulas), Perianal Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ).
Clinical response was observed in 71% of patients treated with adalimumab plus ciprofloxacin and in 47% treated with adalimumab plus placebo (p=0.047). Likewise, remission rate at week 12 was significantly higher (p=0.009) in the combination group (65%) compared with adalimumab plus placebo (33%). Combination treatment was associated with a higher mean CDAI change and mean IBDQ change at week 12 (p=0.005 and p=0.009, respectively). At week 24, no difference in clinical response between the two treatment groups was observed (p=0.22). No difference in safety issues was observed.
Combination therapy of adalimumab and ciprofloxacin is more effective than adalimumab monotherapy to achieve fistula closure in CD. However, after discontinuation of antibiotic therapy, the beneficial effect of initial coadministration is not maintained.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00736983.
Background. We studied whether 48 weeks of pegylated interferon alfa-2b (peginterferon) add-on therapy increases serological response in hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope antigen (HBeAg)–positive ...patients receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy, compared with continued NA monotherapy. Methods. This randomized trial included HBeAg-positive patients with compensated liver disease who were treated with entecavir/tenofovir for >12 months and had an HBV DNA load of <2000 IU/mL. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to 48 weeks of peginterferon add-on therapy (n = 39) or continued NA monotherapy (n = 38). Response (defined as HBeAg seroconversion with an HBV DNA load of <200 IU/mL) was assessed at week 48, with responders discontinuing NA therapy at week 72. Results. The primary end point (response at week 96) was achieved in 18% of patients who were assigned peginterferon add-on therapy versus 8% of patients assigned NA monotherapy (P = .31). Among 58 interferon-naive patients, add-on therapy led to a greater frequency of HBeAg seroconversion (30% vs 7%; P = .034) and response (26% vs 7%; P = .068) at week 96, compared with monotherapy. Among 8 responders at week 48 who discontinued NA therapy at week 72, 6 patients (75%) maintained a response until week 96 (4 of 6 67% in the add-on therapy group vs 2 of 2 100% in the monotherapy group; P = 1.00). Adverse events were mainly related to peginterferon. Conclusion. The primary end point was negative, but peginterferon add-on therapy appeared to result in a greater frequency of HBeAg seroconversion, compared with NA monotherapy, in interferon-naive patients receiving NA therapy. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01532843.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, NMLJ, NUK, PNG, SAZU, UL, UM, UPUK
We studied whether 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a add‐on increases HBsAg‐decline and clearance in HBeAg‐negative patients on long‐term nucleo(s)tide analogue (NA) therapy. In this ...investigator‐initiated, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Europe and Canada, HBeAg‐negative patients treated with NA > 12 months, with HBVDNA < 200 IU/mL, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a add‐on (180 μg per week) or continued NA‐monotherapy with subsequent follow‐up to Week 72. Endpoints were HBsAg decline (≥1 log10 IU/mL) and HBsAg clearance at Week 48. Of the 86 patients in the modified‐intention‐to‐treat analysis, 58 patients received PEG‐IFN add‐on, and 28 continued NA monotherapy. At Week 48, 16(28%) patients achieved HBsAg decline ≥1 log10 in the add‐on arm versus none on NA‐monotherapy (p < .001), and HBsAg clearance was observed in 6 (10%) PEG‐IFN add‐on patients versus 0% NA‐monotherapy (p = .01). HBVRNA was only detected in 2% after PEG‐IFN treatment versus 19% in NA‐monotherapy (p = .002) at Week 48. PEG‐IFN add‐on therapy was well tolerated in majority of patients. Low baseline HBsAg levels (<10 IU/mL) identified patients most likely to achieve HBsAg loss with PEG‐IFN add‐on, whereas an HBsAg level > 200 IU/mL at on‐treatment Week 12 was highly predictive of non‐response (NPV = 100%). Addition of PEG‐IFN to long‐term NA enhanced HBsAg decline and increased the chance of HBsAg clearance in HBeAg‐negative patients on long‐term NA. On‐treatment HBsAg levels >200 IU/mL identify patients unlikely to benefit from PEG‐IFN add‐on and could be used as a potential stopping‐rule for PEG‐IFN therapy. Our findings support further exploration of immune modulation add‐on to antiviral therapy, preferably using response‐guided strategies, to increase functional cure rates in patients with CHB.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
We studied whether 48 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a add-on increases HBsAg-decline and clearance in HBeAg-negative patients on long-term nucleo(s)tide analogue (NA) therapy. In this ...investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Europe and Canada, HBeAg-negative patients treated with NA > 12 months, with HBVDNA < 200 IU/mL, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to 48 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a add-on (180 μg per week) or continued NA-monotherapy with subsequent follow-up to Week 72. Endpoints were HBsAg decline (≥1 log
IU/mL) and HBsAg clearance at Week 48. Of the 86 patients in the modified-intention-to-treat analysis, 58 patients received PEG-IFN add-on, and 28 continued NA monotherapy. At Week 48, 16(28%) patients achieved HBsAg decline ≥1 log
in the add-on arm versus none on NA-monotherapy (p < .001), and HBsAg clearance was observed in 6 (10%) PEG-IFN add-on patients versus 0% NA-monotherapy (p = .01). HBVRNA was only detected in 2% after PEG-IFN treatment versus 19% in NA-monotherapy (p = .002) at Week 48. PEG-IFN add-on therapy was well tolerated in majority of patients. Low baseline HBsAg levels (<10 IU/mL) identified patients most likely to achieve HBsAg loss with PEG-IFN add-on, whereas an HBsAg level > 200 IU/mL at on-treatment Week 12 was highly predictive of non-response (NPV = 100%). Addition of PEG-IFN to long-term NA enhanced HBsAg decline and increased the chance of HBsAg clearance in HBeAg-negative patients on long-term NA. On-treatment HBsAg levels >200 IU/mL identify patients unlikely to benefit from PEG-IFN add-on and could be used as a potential stopping-rule for PEG-IFN therapy. Our findings support further exploration of immune modulation add-on to antiviral therapy, preferably using response-guided strategies, to increase functional cure rates in patients with CHB.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, FZAB, GIS, IJS, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, UL, UM, UPUK
Abstract
Background
(Pegylated) Interferon (PegIFN) therapy leads to response in a minority of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Host genetic determinants of response are therefore in demand.
...Methods
In this genome-wide association study (GWAS), CHB patients, treated with (Peg)IFN for at least 12 weeks ± nucleos(t)ide analogues within randomized trials or as standard of care, were recruited at 21 centers from Europe, Asia, and North America. Response at 24 weeks after (Peg)IFN treatment was defined as combined hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <2000 IU/mL, or an HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL for HBeAg-negative patients.
Results
Of 1144 patients, 1058 (92%) patients were included in the GWAS analysis. In total, 282 (31%) patients achieved the response and 4% hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. GWAS analysis stratified by HBeAg status, adjusted for age, sex, and the 4 ancestry components identified PRELID2 rs371991 (B= −0.74, standard error SE = 0.16, P = 3.44 ×10–6) for HBeAg-positive patients. Importantly, PRELID2 was cross-validated for long-term response in HBeAg-negative patients. G3BP2 rs3821977 (B = 1.13, SE = 0.24, P = 2.46 × 10–6) was associated with response in HBeAg-negative patients. G3BP2 has a role in the interferon pathway and was further examined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy controls stimulated with IFNα and TLR8. After stimulation, less production of IP-10 and interleukin (IL)-10 proteins and more production of IL-8 were observed with the G3BP2 G-allele.
Conclusions
Although no genome-wide significant hits were found, the current GWAS identified genetic variants associated with (Peg)IFN response in CHB. The current findings could pave the way for gene polymorphism-guided clinical counseling, both in the setting of (Peg)IFN and the natural history, and possibly for new immune-modulating therapies.
Clinical Trials Registation
NCT01401400.
This large multi-ethnic genome-wide association study (GWA) study identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms PRELID2 and G3BP2 associated with both short-term and long-term response to (pegylated) interferon in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients, respectively. If further corroborated, these single-nucleotide polymorphisms could aid in clinical counselling.
Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B patients are at high risk of treatment relapse after any antiviral therapy. Combining peginterferon alpha-2a with ribavirin might improve ...sustained response rates.
Overall, 138 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients were randomized to receive monotherapy (peginterferon alpha-2a 180 microg weekly plus placebo) or combination therapy (peginterferon alpha-2a weekly plus ribavirin 1,000 or 1,200 mg daily, depending on body weight) for 48 weeks. Post-treatment follow-up lasted 24 weeks. Analyses were based on the modified intention-to-treat population after exclusion of five patients.
At the end of follow-up, 14 (20%) of 69 patients assigned to monotherapy and 10 (16%) of 64 assigned to combination therapy had a combined response (hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <10,000 copies/ml (<1,714 IU/ml) and a normal alanine aminotransferase level, P=0.49). At the end of treatment, more patients had a combined response (25 (36%) vs. 26 (41%) in the monotherapy and combination therapy group, respectively, P=0.60), but subsequently relapsed during follow-up. Serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels decreased during treatment (mean change at week 48 compared with baseline -3.9 vs. -2.6 log copies/ml, P<0.001 and -0.56 vs. -0.34 log IU/ml, P=0.23, respectively). HBV DNA levels relapsed after treatment discontinuation; HBsAg remained at end-of-treatment levels. In general, combination therapy was well tolerated, although it was associated with a higher risk of anemia and neutropenia.
Treatment with peginterferon alpha-2a resulted in a limited sustained response rate in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients. Addition of ribavirin did not improve response to therapy.
PDF
