Background:
Opioids are commonly prescribed to treat moderate-to-severe pain. However, their use can trigger the development of opioid use disorder. A major problem in treating opioid use disorder ...remains the high rate of relapse.
Aim:
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are differences among opioids in their ability to trigger relapse after pre-exposure during adolescence.
Methods:
On postnatal day 33, mice were examined for the acute locomotor response to saline, morphine, or hydrocodone (5 mg/kg). They were administered with the corresponding opioid or saline during postnatal days 34–38 (20 mg/kg) and 40–44 (40 mg/kg). On postnatal day 45, they were recorded for the development of locomotor sensitization (5 mg/kg). Starting on postnatal day 55, mice were examined for the acquisition (1, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), extinction, and drug-induced reinstatement (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) of conditioned place preference.
Results:
There were no significant differences in the acute locomotor response to morphine and hydrocodone. Morphine induced significantly stronger locomotor sensitization as compared to hydrocodone. Pre-exposure to morphine, but not hydrocodone, sensitized the acquisition of conditioned place preference. There were no significant differences in extinction rates. Mice pre-exposed to morphine reinstate conditioned place preference after priming with a 1 mg/kg dose. In contrast, higher priming doses were required for reinstatement in all other experimental groups.
Conclusions:
Adolescent mice administered with morphine develop greater sensitization to its effects and subsequently reinstate conditioned place preference more readily than mice administered with hydrocodone. This suggests higher risk for relapse after pre-exposure to morphine during adolescence as compared to hydrocodone.
Full text
Available for:
NUK, OILJ, SAZU, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Social environment influences the trajectory of developing opioid use disorder (OUD). Thus, the present study tested the hypothesis that sociability levels will affect the responses to opioids. Mice ...were tested for their baseline sociability, anxiety levels, pain sensitivities, and their acute locomotor response to 5 mg/kg opioids. Then, they were administered repeatedly with saline, hydrocodone, or morphine (20 mg/kg for 5 days, and then 40 mg/kg for 5 days). Subsequently, they were examined for the expression of locomotor sensitization and retested for the effects of opioids on their sociability, anxiety levels, and pain sensitivity. On the basis of their baseline sociability level, mice were divided into socially avoiding and socially exploring. Socially avoiding and socially exploring mice did not differ in their baseline weight and anxiety sensitivities. Socially avoiding mice had slightly higher baseline heat sensitivity than those in socially exploring mice. Repeated administration of opioids had differential effects in socially avoiding and socially exploring mice. In both social groups, repeated morphine administration had overall stronger effects compared with hydrocodone. Morphine-treated socially exploring mice developed greater locomotor sensitization than those in morphine-treated socially avoiding mice. Morphine-treated socially avoiding mice, but not socially exploring mice, spent more time in the center zone of the open-field test and in the light zone of light/dark boxes, and developed heat hyperalgesia. This study suggests that socially exploring animals are more sensitive to the sensitizing effects of opioids. In contrast, opioids have greater effects on the stress and pain systems of socially avoiding animals. Thus, the underlying mechanisms for developing OUD might differ in individuals with various sociability levels.
The orexigenic peptide ghrelin (GHR) interacts with ghrelin receptors (GHR-Rs) to modulate brain reinforcement and feeding circuits. Pharmacological inactivation of GHR-Rs via administration of the ...drug JMV 2959 attenuates the rewarding/reinforcing effects of several drugs of abuse including alcohol, morphine, amphetamine and nicotine. One view of these results is that inactivation of GHR-Rs taps into brain reinforcement/feeding circuits acted upon by drugs of abuse. An alternate explanation is that JMV 2959 may induce malaise, which in turn may limit reinforcement as well as food ingestion. This is a variable of interest given that nicotine alone can induce malaise which may be enhanced by JMV 2959. In the present study, we assessed the capacity of JMV 2959 to produce malaise using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) task. Adult male rats were allowed to consume a 0.1% sodium saccharin solution and then injected IP with either vehicle, 0.4mg/kg nicotine, 3mg/kg JMV 2959, a combination of 0.4mg/kg nicotine and 3mg/kg JMV 2959, or 32mg/kg lithium chloride (a positive control known to support induction of CTA). Lithium chloride produced a robust avoidance of the saccharin solution in subsequent 2 bottle (water and saccharin) tests, whereas JMV 2959 alone did not induce CTA. The combination of JMV 2959 and nicotine induced a moderate degree of CTA that was similar to that produced by nicotine alone. These results suggest that JMV 2959 is unlikely to limit either reinforcement or food ingestion via induction of malaise.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
Abstract The LPHN3 gene has been associated with both attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and addiction, suggesting that it may play a role in the etiology of these disorders. ...Unfortunately, almost nothing is known about the normal functions of this gene, which has hampered understanding of its potential pathogenic role. To begin to characterize such normal functions, we utilized a gene-trap embryonic stem cell line to generate mice mutant for the Lphn3 gene. We evaluated differential gene expression in whole mouse brain between mutant and wild type male littermates at postnatal day 0 using TaqMan gene expression assays. Most notably, we found changes in dopamine and serotonin receptors and transporters (Dat1, Drd4, 5Htt, 5Ht2a), changes in neurotransmitter metabolism genes (Th, Gad1), as well as changes in neural developmental genes (Nurr, Ncam). When mice were examined at 4–6 weeks of age, null mutants showed increased levels of dopamine and serotonin in the dorsal striatum. Finally, null mutant mice had a hyperactive phenotype in the open field test, independent of sex, and were more sensitive to the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine. Considered together, these results suggest that Lphn3 plays a role in development and/or regulation of monoamine signaling. Given the central role for monoamines in ADHD and addiction, it seems likely that the influence of LPHN3 genotype on these disorders is mediated through alterations in monoamine signaling.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
ABSTRACT
Systemic infusions of the orexigenic peptide ghrelin (GHR) increase dopamine levels within the nucleus accumbens and augment cocaine‐stimulated locomotion and conditioned place preference in ...rats; observations that suggest an important role for GHR and GHR receptors (GHR‐Rs) in drug reinforcement. In the present studies, we examined the development of cocaine locomotor sensitization in rats, sustaining either pharmacologic antagonism or genetic ablation of GHR‐Rs. In a pharmacologic study, adult male rats were injected (i.p.) with either 0, 3 or 6 mg/kg JMV 2959 (a GHR‐R1 receptor antagonist), and 20 minutes later, with either vehicle or 10 mg/kg cocaine HCl on each of 7 consecutive days. Rats pretreated with JMV 2959 showed significantly attenuated cocaine‐induced hyperlocomotion. In a second study, adult wild‐type (WT) or mutant rats sustaining ENU‐induced knockout of GHR‐R GHR‐R (−/−) received daily injections (i.p.) of vehicle (0.9% saline) or 10.0 mg/kg cocaine HCl for 14 successive days. GHR‐R null rats treated repeatedly with cocaine showed diminished development of cocaine locomotor sensitization relative to WT rats treated with cocaine. To verify the lack of GHR‐R function in the GHR‐R (−/−) rats, a separate feeding experiment was conducted in which WT rats, but not GHR‐R (−/−) rats, were noted to eat more after a systemic injection of 15 nmol GHR than after vehicle. These results suggest that GHR‐R activity is required for the induction of locomotor sensitization to cocaine and complement an emerging literature implicating central GHR systems in drug reward. GHR is an orexigenic gut peptide that is transported across the blood–brain barrier and interacts with GHR‐Rs located on ventral tegmental dopamine neurons.
Full text
Available for:
BFBNIB, DOBA, FZAB, GIS, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBMB, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Ghrelin (GHR) is an orexigenic gut peptide that modulates multiple homeostatic functions including gastric emptying, anxiety, stress, memory, feeding, and reinforcement. GHR is known to bind and ...activate growth-hormone secretagogue receptors (termed GHR-Rs). Of interest to our laboratory has been the assessment of the impact of GHR modulation of the locomotor activation and reward/reinforcement properties of psychostimulants such as cocaine and nicotine. Systemic GHR infusions augment cocaine stimulated locomotion and conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats, as does food restriction (FR) which elevates plasma ghrelin levels. Ghrelin enhancement of psychostimulant function may occur owing to a direct action on mesolimbic dopamine function or may reflect an indirect action of ghrelin on glucocorticoid pathways. Genomic or pharmacological ablation of GHR-Rs attenuates the acute locomotor-enhancing effects of nicotine, cocaine, amphetamine and alcohol and blunts the CPP induced by food, alcohol, amphetamine and cocaine in mice. The stimulant nicotine can induce CPP and like amphetamine and cocaine, repeated administration of nicotine induces locomotor sensitization in rats. Inactivation of ghrelin circuit function in rats by injection of a ghrelin receptor antagonist (e.g., JMV 2959) diminishes the development of nicotine-induced locomotor sensitization. These results suggest a key permissive role for GHR-R activity for the induction of locomotor sensitization to nicotine. Our finding that GHR-R null rats exhibit diminished patterns of responding for intracranial self-stimulation complements an emerging literature implicating central GHR circuits in drug reward/reinforcement. Finally, antagonism of GHR-Rs may represent a smoking cessation modality that not only blocks nicotine-induced reward but that also may limit weight gain after smoking cessation.
Cocaine use is associated with high levels of impulsive choice (preference for immediate over delayed rewards), but it is not clear whether cocaine use causes elevated impulsive choice, or whether ...elevated impulsive choice is solely a predisposing factor for cocaine use. This study examined the effects of prior cocaine self-administration on rats performing a delay discounting task commonly used to measure impulsive choice. Male Long-Evans rats were implanted with intravenous catheters, and following recovery, were trained to self-administer 30 mg/kg/day cocaine HCl (approx. 0.5 mg/kg/infusion) for 14 consecutive days (a control group received yoked intravenous saline infusions). Following three weeks of withdrawal, all rats were food-restricted and began training on the delay discounting task in standard operant chambers. On each trial, rats were given a choice between two levers. A press on one lever delivered a small food reward immediately, and a press on the other delivered a large food reward after a variable delay period. Rats that self-administered cocaine displayed greater impulsive choice (enhanced preference for the small immediate over the large delayed reward, as reflected by shorter indifference points) compared to controls, but were no different from controls on a "probabilistic discounting" task in which they chose between small certain and large uncertain rewards. These data suggest that self-administered cocaine can cause lasting elevations in impulsive choice, and that the high levels of impulsive choice observed in human cocaine users may be due in part to long-term effects of cocaine on brain function.
Full text
Available for:
CEKLJ, FFLJ, NUK, ODKLJ, PEFLJ, UPUK
The focus of the present review is the modulation of eating by the endogenous catecholamines (CA) dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE). Topics addressed include pharmacological and genomic ...manipulations of brain CA systems and subsequent changes in ingestive behavior. DA in particular is a key component of brain reinforcement systems and feeding-associated changes in DA may play a role in the reinforcing aspects of feeding. NE has been linked to both stimulation and suppression of eating and recent evidence has linked these effects to activation of distinct adrenoceptor subtypes. Recent evidence suggests that NE systems may interact with DA systems to augment the activational effects of psychostimulant drugs, such as cocaine or amphetamine, and DA/NE interactions may play a key role in the capacity of psychostimulants to suppress eating.
•Housing with drug-naïve animals protects against the development of opioid reward.•Morphine induced an increase in striatal expression levels of D1DR and AVP.•Housing with drug-naïve animals ...diminished these effects on striatal expression.•Inhibiting AVP-V1b receptors reduced the acquisition of morphine CPP.•Protective effects of housing on the development of opioid reward is mediated by AVP.
The association with opioid-abusing individuals or even the perception of opioid abuse by peers are risk factors for the initiation and escalation of abuse. Similarly, we demonstrated that morphine-treated animals housed with only morphine-treated animals (referred to as morphine only) acquire morphine conditioned place-preference (CPP) more readily than morphine-treated animals housed with drug-naïve animals (referred to as morphine cage-mates). However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects are still elusive.
Mice received repeated morphine or saline while housed as saline only, morphine only, or cage-mates. Then, they were examined for the expression levels of D1 dopamine receptor (D1DR), D2 dopamine receptor (D2DR), dopamine transporter (DAT), oxytocin, and Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) in the striatum using qPCR. Additionally, we examined the effects of the AVP-V1b receptor antagonist, SSR149415, on the acquisition of morphine conditioned place-preference (CPP).
Increased striatal expression of D1DR and AVP was observed in morphine only animals, but not morphine cage-mates. No significant effects were observed on the striatal expression of D2DR, DAT, or oxytocin. Antagonizing the AVP-V1b receptors decreased the acquisition of morphine CPP in the morphine only mice, but did not alter the acquisition of morphine CPP in the morphine cage-mate mice.
Housing with drug-naïve animals protects against the increase in striatal expression of D1DR and AVP elicited by morphine exposure. Moreover, our studies suggest that the protective effect of housing with drug-naïve animals on the acquisition of morphine reward might be, at least partially, mediated by AVP.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZRSKP
The focus of the present review is to reconsider the role of endogenous norepinephrine (NE) in brain, specifically within the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), with regard to its potential ...role in eliciting eating or satiety. The PVN is innervated by NE fibers and is a site at which infusion of exogenous NE elicits eating at low doses. Two subtypes of α-adrenergic receptors within the PVN exert antagonistic actions on eating in the rat: activation of PVN α
2-adrenoceptors increases eating, whereas activation of PVN α
1-adrenoceptors suppresses eating. Pharmacologic manipulations that elevate NE can increase or decrease food intake, depending on the site and type of NE manipulation. Certain antiobesity drugs may act to reduce eating via release of NE and subsequent activation of α
1-adrenoceptors. The PVN exhibits a reliable rhythm in the secretion of endogenous NE over the dark-and-light cycle, and this rhythm may interact with changes in numbers of PVN α
1- and α
2-adrenoceptors to modulate eating during the dark-and-light cycle. Push-and-pull and microdialysis studies indicate that NE secretion is strongly associated with eating, particularly at the start of the dark phase. The present review considers potential interactions of NE with substances such as leptin and neuropeptide Y that alter eating.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NUK, OILJ, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK
PDF
