Kant’s position on the colonial question has mostly been discussed by referring to his conceptions of relationships between collective groupings (states, nations, ‘races’, peoples). The text argues ...that his strong anti-colonial stance rather stems from his normative framework – developed in the second half of the 1790s – of a limited scope of the right to hospitality that an individual is intitled to enjoy upon arrival on a foreign territory.
O Kantovem stališču do kolonialnega vprašanja so večinoma razpravljali s sklicevanjem na njegove koncepcije odnosov med kolektivnimi združenji (državami, narodi, »rasami«, ljudstvi). Prispevek argumentira, da njegova močna protikolonialna drža prej izhaja iz njegovega normativnega okvira – razvitega v drugi polovici 1790-ih – omejenega obsega pravice do gostoljubja, ki jo ima posameznik ob prihodu na tuje ozemlje.
"Post/Trans/Hyper?: The Case for Humanism" Giesen, Klaus-Gerd
Monitor ISH: Revija za humanistične in družbene vede / Monitor ISH: Journal for the Humanities and the Social Sciences,
2021, Volume:
23, Issue:
n° 2
Journal Article
Open access
The essay argues that the covid-19 crisis has caused a humanist leap on a planetary scale. It then examines possible objections from three currents of thought (posthumanism, tran-shumanism, ...hyperhumanism) which believe, in its own way, that the coronavirus pandemic demonstrates, on the contrary, that it is important to go beyond any humanist interpretation. It concludes that such an outbidding of humanism is not convincing.
PDF