Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) is prognostically highly relevant in patients with COPD. The criteria for severe PH have been defined based on hemodynamic thresholds in right heart ...catheterization.
Can noninvasive clinical tools predict severe PH in patients with COPD? How does the mortality risk change with increasing severity of airflow limitation and pulmonary vascular disease?
We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive patients with COPD with suspected PH undergoing in-depth clinical evaluation, including right heart catheterization, in our PH clinic between 2005 and 2018. Clinical variables potentially indicative of severe PH or death were analyzed using univariate and stepwise multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analysis adjusted for age and sex.
We included 142 patients with median FEV1 of 55.0% predicted (interquartile range IQR, 42.4%–69.4% predicted) and mean pulmonary arterial pressure of 35 mm Hg (IQR, 27–43 mm Hg). A multivariate model combining echocardiographic systolic pulmonary arterial pressure of ≥ 56 mm Hg, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels of ≥ 650 pg/mL, and pulmonary artery (PA) to ascending aorta (Ao) diameter ratio on chest CT scan of ≥ 0.93 predicted severe PH with high positive and negative predictive values (both 94%). After correction for age and sex, both airflow limitation (P = .002; Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease GOLD stages 1-2 vs stage 3: hazard ratio HR, 1.56 95% CI, 0.90-2.71; GOLD stages 1-2 vs stage 4: HR, 3.45 95% CI, 1.75-6.79) and PH severity (P = .012; HR, 1.85 95% CI, 1.15-2.99) remained associated independently with survival. The combination of GOLD stages 3 and 4 airflow limitation and severe PH showed the poorest survival (HR for death, 3.26 95% CI, 1.62-6.57; P = .001 vs GOLD stages 1-2 combined with nonsevere PH).
In patients with COPD, the combination of echocardiography, NT-proBNP level, and PA to Ao diameter ratio predicts severe PH with high sensitivity and specificity. The contribution of severe PH and severe airflow limitation to impaired survival is comparable.
Radial artery access has been used for left heart catheterization (LHC) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for over 30 years. This method has gained popularity among operators due to ...superficial vessel anatomy, allowing for easy accessibility and compressibility, resulting in effective hemostasis.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PCI due to ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), and chest pain (stable angina) from November 2013 to February 2023.
We analyzed validated registries and found 7714 PCIs. Of these, 1230 were STEMI patients, 5585 were NSTE-ACS patients, and 899 were stable angina patients, forming the basis of our final analysis. In STEMI patients, there was a trend toward a higher rate of ventriculography with femoral access compared to radial access (53.4 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.06), which was also observed in NSTE-ACS patients (34.2 % vs. 31.8 %, p = 0.07). The use of central venous access was more common with femoral access in all three diagnoses, with significantly higher rates seen in STEMI patients (36.2 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.001), NSTE-ACS patients (19.3 % vs. 2.8 %, p < 0.001), and chest pain patients (26.4 % vs. 2.7 %, p < 0.001).
The analysis revealed that operators may perform fewer ventriculography and RHC procedures when using radial access as compared to femoral access. While there is discrepancy in performing left ventriculography and RHC when using a radial artery, it is essential to emphasize that routinely performing ventriculography and hemodynamic assessment has not proven to impact outcomes, despite their contributions to proper decision-making and treatment.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Objective The severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) dynamically changes during a stress test. Isometric handgrip is a readily-available stress test in daily practice; however, little is known ...regarding the response to isometric handgrip in MR patients during right heart catheterization. We aimed to evaluate this issue from our case-series study. Methods We retrospectively investigated consecutive MR patients using the isometric handgrip stress test during right heart catheterization at our institution between October 2019 and April 2021. After resting measurements were obtained, sustained maximum-effort hand dynamometer grasping was maintained for about 2-3 minutes. We investigated the differences in right heart catheterization data between at rest and during handgrip, and evaluated the individual response to the isometric handgrip stress test. Results We investigated a total of 15 patients (mean age: 75±6 years, moderate/severe MR: 7/8, primary/secondary MR: 8/7, mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 56±16%, exertional dyspnea: 10). During the handgrip test, the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) significantly increased (9 8, 13 mmHg at rest to 20 15, 27 mmHg during handgrip; p<0.001). PCWP changes varied among individuals (range 2-22 mmHg) and were not correlated with patients' backgrounds including age, the natriuretic peptide levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter or E/e' (all p>0.05). Patients with PCWP ≥25 mmHg during handgrip had a higher prevalence of exertional dyspnea than those without (6 100% vs. 4 44%; p=0.04). Conclusion We observed dynamic and varied hemodynamic changes during isometric handgrip in MR patients, suggesting that further research is needed to evaluate the clinical value of this maneuver.
The measurements used to define pulmonary hypertension (PH) etiology, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP), and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) vary in clinical practice. We aimed ...to identify clinical features associated with measurement discrepancy between PAWP and LVEDP in patients with PH.
We extracted clinical data and invasive hemodynamics from consecutive patients undergoing concurrent right and left heart catheterization at Vanderbilt University between 1998 and 2014. The primary outcome was discordance between PAWP and LVEDP in patients with PH in a logistic regression model.
We identified 2,270 study subjects (median age, 63 years; 53% men). The mean difference between PAWP and LVEDP was −1.6 mm Hg (interquartile range, −15 to 12 mm Hg). The two measurements were moderately correlated by linear regression (R = 0.6, P < .001). Results were similar when restricted to patients with PH. Among patients with PH (n = 1,331), older age (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.23-2.45) was associated with PAWP underestimation in multivariate models, whereas atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.08-2.84), a history of rheumatic valve disease (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.36-3.52), and larger left atrial diameter (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.32) were associated with PAWP overestimation of LVEDP. Results were similar in sensitivity analyses.
Clinically meaningful disagreement between PAWP and LVEDP is common. Atrial fibrillation, rheumatic valve disease, and larger left atrial diameter are associated with misclassification of PH etiology when relying on PAWP alone. These findings are important because of the fundamental differences in the treatment of precapillary and postcapillary PH.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
To identify preoperative predictors of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy and evaluate trajectory of postoperative ventricular function.
From ...January 2017 to January 2020, 238 patients with ejection fraction <30% (206/238) or 30% to 34% with at least moderately severe mitral regurgitation (32/238) underwent conventional cardiac surgery at Cleveland Clinic, 125 with ischemic and 113 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Preoperative ejection fraction was 25 ± 4.5%. The primary outcome was postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, defined as need for microaxial temporary left ventricular assist device, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or vasoactive-inotropic score >25. RandomForestSRC was used to identify its predictors.
Postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock occurred in 27% (65/238). Pulmonary artery pulsatility index <3.5 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >19 mm Hg were the most important factors predictive of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Cardiac index <2.2 L·min−1 m−2 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >21 mm Hg were the most important predictive factors in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Operative mortality was 1.7%. Ejection fraction at 12 months after surgery increased to 39% (confidence interval, 35-40%) in the ischemic group and 37% (confidence interval, 35-38%) in the nonischemic cardiomyopathy group.
Predictors of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock were different in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Right heart dysfunction, indicated by low pulmonary artery pulsatility index, was the most important predictor in ischemic cardiomyopathy, whereas greater degree of cardiac decompensation was the most important in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Therefore, preoperative right heart catheterization will help identify patients with low ejection fraction who are at greater risk of postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock.
Display omitted
Right heart catheterization (RHC) stands as a unique tool for both diagnosing and managing a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. Though its origins trace back to the 18th century, the most ...substantial progress was achieved in the 20th century. The focus of this review is on pulmonary hypertension (PH), where RHC is recognized as the diagnostic gold standard. Parameters derived from this procedure are crucial for classifying PH into various subgroups, assessing the risk of adverse events or mortality, and informing treatment strategies. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines define PH as an increase in mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPm) greater than 25 mmHg. The differentiation between pre- and post-capillary PH is based on the levels of pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP). Furthermore, right atrial pressure (RAP), cardiac index (CI), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO
) are the sole parameters recommended for prognostic assessment, specifically in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Patients presenting with RAP exceeding 14 mmHg, CI less than 2.0 L/min/m
, and SvO
below 60% are considered to be at a high risk (greater than 10%) of death within the subsequent year. A primary goal in the management of PAH is the early diagnosis to facilitate the swift initiation of treatment. This aims to minimize symptom burden, optimize the patient's biochemical, hemodynamic, and functional profile, and curtail adverse events. To achieve these objectives, clinicians must remain informed about emerging risk factors and be familiar with the revised hemodynamic definition for PAH.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
Radiation exposure during invasive cardiovascular procedures remains an important health care issue. Lead aprons and shields (LAS) are used to decrease radiation exposure but leave large portions of ...the body unshielded. The Rampart IC M1128 is a portable radiation shielding system that may significantly attenuate radiation exposure.
Catheterization laboratory teams were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to perform elective invasive cardiovascular procedures utilizing either traditional LAS or the Rampart IC M1128. Radiation exposure was measured using real-time dosimetry monitoring in prespecified anatomic locations on 3 operators (position 1: first operator/fellow; position 2: second operator/attending; and position 3: catheterization laboratory nurse/technologist). Radiation exposure was measured on a per-case basis.
In total, 100 consecutive cases were randomized in this study (47 Rampart; 53 LAS). There was no difference in fluoroscopy time (12.3 minutes for Rampart vs 15.4 minutes for LAS; P = .52), dose area product (288 Gy⋅cm2 for Rampart vs 376.5 Gy⋅cm2 for LAS; P = .52), or scatter radiation (38.8 mRem for Rampart vs 46.8 mRem for LAS; P = .61) between the groups. There was significantly lower total body radiation (in milliroentgen equivalent man) exposure using the Rampart than that using LAS for each team member: position 1—0.1 mRem for Rampart vs 2.2 mRem for LAS; P < .001; position 2—0.1 mRem Rampart vs 3.2 mRem LAS; P < .001; and position 3—0.0 mRem for Rampart vs 0.8 mRem for LAS; P < .001.
During routine clinical procedures, the Rampart system significantly decreases total body radiation exposure compared with traditional LAS.
Display omitted
•Rampart reduces total body radiation compared to traditional lead aprons and shields.•Rampart significantly reduces radiation to the head and neck.•Rampart enables lead-free invasive cardiac procedures.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
9.
Definitions and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Hoeper, Marius M., MD; Bogaard, Harm Jan, MD; Condliffe, Robin, MD ...
Journal of the American College of Cardiology,
12/2013, Volume:
62, Issue:
25
Journal Article, Conference Proceeding
Peer reviewed
Open access
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥25 mm Hg at rest, measured during right heart catheterization. There is still insufficient evidence to add an exercise ...criterion to this definition. The term pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) describes a subpopulation of patients with PH characterized hemodynamically by the presence of pre-capillary PH including an end-expiratory pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤15 mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance >3 Wood units. Right heart catheterization remains essential for a diagnosis of PH or PAH. This procedure requires further standardization, including uniformity of the pressure transducer zero level at the midthoracic line, which is at the level of the left atrium. One of the most common problems in the diagnostic workup of patients with PH is the distinction between PAH and PH due to left heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A normal PAWP does not rule out the presence of HFpEF. Volume or exercise challenge during right heart catheterization may be useful to unmask the presence of left heart disease, but both tools require further evaluation before their use in general practice can be recommended. Early diagnosis of PAH remains difficult, and screening programs in asymptomatic patients are feasible only in high-risk populations, particularly in patients with systemic sclerosis, for whom recent data suggest that a combination of clinical assessment and pulmonary function testing including diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, biomarkers, and echocardiography has a higher predictive value than echocardiography alone.
Full text
Available for:
GEOZS, IJS, IMTLJ, KILJ, KISLJ, NLZOH, NUK, OILJ, PNG, SAZU, SBCE, SBJE, UILJ, UL, UM, UPCLJ, UPUK, ZAGLJ, ZRSKP
PDF
