O estudo atual examina vários movimentos ideológicos e os conecta a uma interpretação do direito processual civil. Muita carga ideológica foi incorporada aos termos normativos com o tempo e as ...influências dos contextos históricos na composição do Poder Legislativo. Essa concepção é evidente nos institutos jurídicos contemporâneos. Assim, a presente análise é realizada para atualizar a visão dessas ideologias, voltadas ao estudo do processo civil para verificar o cumprimento de seus escopos sociais. Desde ideologias clássicas até ideologias críticas, os fenômenos são examinados com foco na questão processual, usando estudos históricos e dedutivos críticos, bem como estudos reflexivos. A partir dessa perspectiva, o texto examina o processo civil contemporâneo usando os efeitos das ideologias clássicas do liberalismo, conservadorismo, socialismo, nacionalismo, anarquismo e nazifascismo, bem como dos feminismos, ecologismos, multiculturalismos e fundamentalismos religiosos contemporâneos. É fundamental entender como uma legislação cujo objetivo é estabelecer as diretrizes para o desenvolvimento do processo civil no Brasil pode conter tantas variáveis importantes que impactam a forma como o processo civil no Brasil se desenvolverá. O debate planejado começa com uma discussão sobre os fundamentos da ideologia, discutindo autores como Terry Eagleton, Karl Mannheim e Michael Löwy, antes de se expandir para uma discussão razoável a partir das perspectivas de Mauro Cappelletti e Ovídio Baptista Silva. Desde já, é possível identificar como os diferentes fenômenos jurídicos surgiram a partir da perspectiva dos movimentos ideológicos em questão. Embora esse tipo de análise não seja visto no domínio do processo civil, as considerações desse nível podem ajudar na compreensão e resolução de vários conflitos que podem surgir. Eles também podem ajudar a entender por que uma regra específica foi criada e de onde vem. Por esse motivo, o debate desperta a curiosidade daquele que sempre se ateve a observar o direito processual como um ramo eminentemente norteado por regras, sem se debruçar pelas ideologias a ele inerentes.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 bertolak belakang dengan Perjalanan panjang praktik hukum acara perdata di Indonesia yang selalu berusaha mengikuti perkembangan ...teknologi dan informasi sehingga hukum menjadi tidak ketinggalan jaman, dan juga berseberangan dengan semangat UU ITE yang telah memberikan perlindungan/kepastian hukum atas aktifitas manusia menggunakan sarana elektronik dan teknologi informasi yang semakin umum dilakukan. Putusan tersebut telah mereduksi ketentuan dalam UU ITE yang menyatakan bahwa Informasi Elektronik dan/atau Dokumen Elektronik dan/atau hasil cetaknya merupakan alat bukti hukum yang sah dan memperluas jenis alat bukti hukum yang selama ini dikenal dalam hukum acara yang berlaku. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang telah memberikan penafsiran terhadap frasa Informasi Elekronik dan/atau Dokumen Elektronik dalam Pasal 5 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) menjadi tidak berlaku terhadap hukum acara perdata.
Abstract An arbitration Agreement between the parties is an important source of law in the arbitration proceeding, especially in International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration Agreements, which ...could be made before and after the dispute, provide jurisdiction to the arbitral tribunal to settle the dispute. Traditionally, the arbitration agreement provides that only the parties in the agreement could be bound by the arbitration proceeding. However, in commercial arbitration, there is a circumstance in which a third party could be bound to arbitration proceedings. Indonesia has an arbitration law based on Law No. 30 Year 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This law stipulates how arbitration proceedings could proceed in Indonesia, including third-party issues in arbitration proceedings, as stipulated in Article 30. However, it depends on an arbitrator to settle since the Law itself does not explain further. The definition also does not govern in BANI Rules and Procedure as BANI procedural law. One opinion based on the writer’s research shows that commercial arbitration in Indonesia could also consider Indonesian Civil Procedural Law, as well as the regulation toward third parties’ involvement. Some of the mechanism of third parties’ involvement that has been regulated in Indonesian Civil Procedural Law is Vrijwaring, Tussenkomst, and Voeging. Abstrak Perjanjian Arbitrase di antara para pihak merupakan sumber hukum utama dalam proses arbitrase, khususnya dalam Arbitrase Komersial Internasional. Perjanjian Arbitrase dapat dibuat sebelum dan setelah sengketa, dan merupakan dasar kewenangan dari lembaga arbitrase untuk menyelesaikan sengketa. Secara konsep, perjanjian arbitrase hanya mengikat para pihak yang terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase. Namun demikian, terdapat kondisi bilamana pihak ketiga dapat terikat dalam proses arbitrase. Indonesia mengatur arbitrase dalam UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Undang-undang ini mengatur bagaimana proses arbitrase di Indonesia, termasuk para pihak dalam proses arbitrase sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 30. Hal ini sangat tergantung pada arbiter untuk memutuskannya karena undang-undang tidak memberikan penjelasan lebih lanjut. Penjelasan selanjutnya juga tidak diatur dalam Hukum Acara BANI. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan, dalam arbitrase komersial di Indonesia, para pihak perlu mempertimbangkan Hukum Acara Perdata yang berlaku di Indonesia, khususnya mengenai pengaturan bagaimana pihak ketiga bisa terikat dalam proses arbitrase. Mekanisme keterlibatan pihak ketiga yang diatur dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia yaitu Vrijwaring, Tussenkomst, and Voeging.
The principle of pari passu prorata partij is applied in bankruptcy cases involving several creditors and debtors. This encourages a study of legal protection for the application of the pari passu ...prorata partij principle to concurrent creditors in the perspective of civil procedural law. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the principle of pari passu prorata partij provides legal protection for concurrent creditors. The research method used is a qualitative type of literature study. The results of this study indicate that the principle of pari passu prorata partij provides a solution that the provision of repayment to creditors is given jointly without anyone taking precedence, especially concurrent creditors who do not have privileges in accordance with the provisions of the law. Debt repayments to creditors are also scaled according to their relative debt. According to Article 37 of Law no. 37 of 2004, if the debtor's assets are not sufficient to cover his debts, then the curator will make more efforts by filing an actio paulina case. It can be concluded that the principle of pari passu prorata partij can provide solutions and legal protection for bankruptcy problems involving both parties.
The present study analyzes the conditions and limits for the procedural agreements in brazilian enforced execution (art. 190 CPC). It also deals with the controversy about the possibility to remove ...protection of “legal family property” (bem de família) or the debtor's salary by procedural agreements, and the appropriateness of procedural settles to dejudicialization enforced civil execution and to deal atypical conventional executive measures.
This paper analyzes the characteristics (and limits) of procedural flexibility and the combination of procedures in the Brazilian Civil Procedure Law, as instruments that allow the judge to promote ...procedural adaptability to adequate the procedures to the characteristics and peculiarities of the case.
O presente artigo tem por finalidade a análise dos aspectos processuais correlatos à Lei n. 14.181/2021, também conhecida como “Lei de Superendividamento”, que criou espécie de procedimento especial, ...dividido em duas fases: (a) a fase de repactuação consensual de dívidas e (b) a fase de revisão compulsória por superendividamento. Para tanto, foram utilizadas as metodologias jurídico-descritiva e jurídico-prospectiva, tendo como resultado a descrição do procedimento e a identificação das tendências processuais estruturadas pela Lei.
This paper presents a comparison between the system of conflict management in the US federal courts (Court Management and Case Management) with the conflict management model of the Brazilian civil ...procedural law, especially after the advent of the 2015 code of civil procedure law (Law n. 13.105/2015).
New rules for transferring the case from one court to another are being investigated, the conclusion on expanding the competence of the court on this issue is substantiated. The most problematic ...requirements for the content of the claim, which are not provided with legal and organizational mechanisms, are considered.Particular attention was paid to the problem of implementing “cassation filters”, which have undergone additional changes since the main reform strengthens them. It is proved that this problem is closely related to another one – the problem of defining a certain legal concepts, substantiates a significant expansion of the scope of judicial discretion in determining the grounds for cassation appeal in a particular case.The article considers the possibility of referring to the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights as the sources of civil procedural law of Ukraine. The problem of administering justice under martial law received separate consideration.It is concluded that the evaluation of the effectiveness of judicial reform involves its critical consideration by both science and practice, generalization and analysis of law enforcement practice will provide grounds for a final assessment of the quality of reform.
The essay is a reworking of the speech given at the Conference on "Onere della prova e accertamento del fatto nel nuovo processo civile" organised at the Università Cattolica del S. Cuore - Milan 20 ...April 2023. The A. gives a preliminary exposition on the novelties introduced by the 2022 Cartabia Reform on civil justice relating to the Court of Cassation judgment. The A. focuses on the limits of only indirect censorship of the second instance judgement on the merit and addresses the principle of self-sufficiency and of clarity and conciseness of appeals in cassation, which are both functional to protect the nature of mere legality of the Supreme Court's review of the judgments on the merit.
PDF
