All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert ...referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: (1) Authors send their papers to the email address of the conference. (2) All submissions go through a preliminary review to check the scope, length and plagiarism. (3) Problematic papers sent back to the authors. (4) The rest papers assigned to relevant reviewers. The email address used for the management system is emceme@126.com and the person in charge is Professor Huayuan Wu. • Number of submissions received: 478 • Number of submissions sent for review: 418 • Number of submissions accepted: 378 Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 79.08% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 35 • Any additional info on review process: (1) Papers divided into several sections according to the scopes. (2) Authors’ names, affiliations and emails removed from papers. (3) Papers assigned to relevant reviewers for peer review. (4) Papers rejected if two reviewers give a poor rating to the same paper. (5) Papers sent for publication if two reviewers accept the same paper. (6) Papers sent to editors for final decision if two reviewers disagree on the same paper. (7) Authors revise papers according to the reviewers’ comments. • Contact person for queries (please include: name, affiliation, institutional email address) Liyun Guo, China University of Geosciences, 120040787@cug.edu.cn
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert ...referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-blind • Conference submission management system: no, articles were sent directly to editor on conference e-mail icmtmt@gmail.com • Number of submissions received: 512 • Number of submissions sent for review: 455 • Number of submissions accepted: 416 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 81,25 • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 910 The main criteria for the review were: 1. Is the topic in the conference scope? 2. Is subject is worthy the publication? 3. Is information new? 4. Is paper written in acceptable English? For each question, the reviewer used scale from 1 to 5 to answer. The reviewer also checked that article was formatted according the Template, that all references, figures and tables were cited in the text and provided other comments. • Contact person for queries: Dr. Stanislav Roshchupkin, icmtmte@gmail.com, Tel. +79787040395
To solve the information explosion problem and enhance user experience in various online applications, recommender systems have been developed to model users' preferences. Although numerous efforts ...have been made toward more personalized recommendations, recommender systems still suffer from several challenges, such as data sparsity and cold-start problems. In recent years, generating recommendations with the knowledge graph as side information has attracted considerable interest. Such an approach can not only alleviate the above mentioned issues for a more accurate recommendation, but also provide explanations for recommended items. In this paper, we conduct a systematical survey of knowledge graph-based recommender systems. We collect recently published papers in this field, and group them into three categories, i.e., embedding-based methods, connection-based methods, and propagation-based methods. Also, we further subdivide each category according to the characteristics of these approaches. Moreover, we investigate the proposed algorithms by focusing on how the papers utilize the knowledge graph for accurate and explainable recommendation. Finally, we propose several potential research directions in this field.
Object detection has recently experienced substantial progress. Yet, the widely adopted horizontal bounding box representation is not appropriate for ubiquitous oriented objects such as objects in ...aerial images and scene texts. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect multi-oriented objects. Instead of directly regressing the four vertices, we glide the vertex of the horizontal bounding box on each corresponding side to accurately describe a multi-oriented object. Specifically, We regress four length ratios characterizing the relative gliding offset on each corresponding side. This may facilitate the offset learning and avoid the confusion issue of sequential label points for oriented objects. To further remedy the confusion issue for nearly horizontal objects, we also introduce an obliquity factor based on area ratio between the object and its horizontal bounding box, guiding the selection of horizontal or oriented detection for each object. We add these five extra target variables to the regression head of faster R-CNN, which requires ignorable extra computation time. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that without bells and whistles, the proposed method achieves superior performances on multiple multi-oriented object detection benchmarks including object detection in aerial images, scene text detection, pedestrian detection in fisheye images.
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering have been peer-reviewed through processes administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were ...conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing.• Type of peer review: Single Anonymous• Conference submission management system: The CVENT submission management system and Morressier• Number of full paper submissions received: 59• Number of full paper submissions sent for review: 59• Number of submissions accepted: 52• Acceptance Rate (Submissions Accepted / Submissions Received × 100): 88.13%• Average number of reviews per paper: 2• Total number of reviewers involved: 37Contact persons for queries:Name: Bernard RolfeEmail: Bernard.Rolfe@deakin.edu.auAffiliation: Deakin University, AustraliaName: Matthias WeissEmail: Matthias.Weiss@deakin.edu.auAffiliation: Deakin University, AustraliaName: Peng (Neo) ZhangEmail: Peng.Neo.Zhang@deakin.edu.auAffiliation: Deakin University, AustraliaName: Jeong Whan YoonEmail: j.yoon@kaist.ac.krAffiliation: KAIST, South Korea / Deakin University, Australia
All papers published in this volume of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science have been peer reviewed through processes administered by the Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert ...referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal published by IOP Publishing. • Type of peer review: Double-review and non-blind. There were two rounds of reviews conducted by ICEEG 2020. The first round is the preliminary examination, which checks the quality and the scope of the submissions. The second round is professional review. Two experts in related research fields gave professional review on the submissions and put forward suggestions for revision. At last, the accepted submissions received the acceptance notice. • Conference submission management system: All submissions are required to send by email to iceeg2020@163.com, oversaw by Zhuo Wang (wangzhuo18@mail.jlu.edu.cn) Jing Li (inter_lijing@jlu.edu.cn) • Number of submissions received: 213 • Number of submissions sent for review: 165 • Number of submissions accepted: 159 • Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100): 74.6% • Average number of reviews per paper: 2 • Total number of reviewers involved: 38 • Any additional info on review process: • Contact person for queries: (please include name, affiliation and email address) Professor Qi Lu College of Geo-Exploration Science and Technology, Jilin University luqi@jlu.edu.cn
All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:
•
Type of peer review:
Single blind
•
Conference ...submission management system:
By email received from the organizing and editorial committee of the conference. The correspondence authors make the submission by email.
•
Number of submissions received:
17
•
Number of submissions sent for review:
17
•
Number of submissions accepted:
11
•
Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received × 100):
64.71%
•
Average number of reviews per paper:
2 reviews per paper
•
Total number of reviewers involved:
8
•
Any additional info on review process:
All papers are plagiarism checked by Turnitin software
•
Contact person for queries:
Ely Dannier V. Niño
Foundation of Researchers in Science and Technology of Materials (FORISTOM)
Email:info@foristom.org
All conference organisers/editors are required to declare details about their peer review. Therefore, please provide the following information:• Type of peer review: Single blind• Conference ...submission management system:By email received from the organizing and editorial committee of the conference. The correspondence authors make the submission by email.• Number of submissions received:24• Number of submissions sent for review:24• Number of submissions accepted:20• Acceptance Rate (Number of Submissions Accepted / Number of Submissions Received X 100):83.33%• Average number of reviews per paper:2 reviews per paper• Total number of reviewers involved:12• Any additional info on review process:All papers are plagiarism checked by Turnitin software• Contact person for queries:Ely Dannier V. NiñoFoundation of Researchers in Science and Technology of Materials (FORISTOM)Email: info@foristom.org
A Sandoval-Amador1,2, J P Rojas-Suarez3, and E D V-Niño1 1 Foundation of Researchers in Science and Technology of Materials, Colombia 2 Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos ...Aires, Tandil, Argentina 3 Universidad Fransisco de Paula Santander, San José de Cúcuta, Colobia E-mail: anderson84f@gmail.com, deydannv@gmail.com These proceedings present the written contributions of th participants of The 5th International Week of Science, Technology and Innovation (5th IWSTI), which was held from 20 to 23 November, 2018, at the San José de Cúcuta city, Colombia, and was organized by alianza del Sistema de Instituciones de Educación Superior de Norte de Santander (SIES+). This event was aimed at the academic and scientific community and the productive sectors of the region. The purpose of the 5th IWSTI was disseminate the advances in research and extension of national and international institutions, through research groups and incubators, promoting the participation of the productive sectors in research, extension, technological development and innovation activities that strengthen the University - Company - Government relationship. Moreover, 5th IWSTI searched the exchange of experiences with researchers from National and International fields. The 5th IWSTI had the participation of students, professors, businessmen and researchers from Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Chile, Mexico, United State of America and Spain. List of Organizing Committee, International Scienctific Committee, National Scientific Committee are available in this pdf
PDF
