Osrednji slovenski literarni časopis je izhajal mesečno. Po prenehanju izhajanja Stritarjevega časnika Zvona, so Josip Jurčič, Fran Levec, Janko Kersnik in Ivan Tavčar ustanovili literarno ...svobodomiselno revijo, sprva kot glasilo realistov. Poleg leposlovja, je vseboval tudi umetniško kritiko ter razprave in eseje o umetnostih. Sprva je bil bolj znanstveno usmerjen (Leposlovni in znanstveni list), kasneje se je omejil še na humanistiko (Mesečnik za književnost in prosveto), od 1931 (Slovenska revija) je objavljal tudi prispevke o aktualnih družbenih vprašanjih. V Ljubljanskem zvonu so objavljali pomembnejši slovenski pesniki in pisatelji: Anton Aškerc, Simon Gregorčič, Janko Kersnik, Ivan Tavčar, Janez Trdina, Oton Župančič, Ivan Cankar, Vladimir Bartol… Avtorji, ki so pisali o znanosti so bili: Fran levstik, Josip Apih, Ivan Šubic…
We first specify Anton Vodnik’s role in literary history and his style. The article’s main interest is the distribution and types of intertextuality in his poetry from the inter-war period (Žalostne ...roke, 1922; Vigilije, 1923; Talitá, kumi, 1923) with regard to the Marian motif. We consider poems that are intertextually connected and influenced by the Bible, Rilke, Verlaine, Maeterlinck, Trakl, and Župančič. We also reveal intermedial relations with the early and high Renaissance, Pre-Raphaelite art, art nouveau decorative style, and paintings by the Kralj brothers. There are detailed intertextual analyses of the poems Oznanjenje The Annunciation, Ženitna v Kani The wedding feast at Cana and Immaculata.
U radu nastojimo osvijetliti biografsku sastavnicu u opusu Branka Vodnika, s naglaskom na metabiografska i metodološka očitovanja u njegovim književnopovijesnim i kritičkim člancima te u natuknicama ...u Narodnoj enciklopediji srpsko-hrvatsko-slovenačkoj . Kako bi uvid u Vodnikov leksikografski rad bio potpuniji, konzultirana je i opisana i leksikografska građa u Vodnikovoj rukopisnoj ostavštini. Cilj je rada trojak: osvjetljenje manje poznatih Vodnikovih zapažanja o metodi književnopovijesnoga posla, povezivanje njegovih teza u studijama s interpretacijama koje je donio u natuknicama i opis prijepora u književnopovijesnoj struci koji su se izravno očitovali u Vodnikovu radu i na njegovu profesionalnom putu. Kao istaknut književni povjesničar hrvatske moderne, prepoznat kao metodološki inovator i reformator, recepcijski je bio i precjenjivan kao prvi znanstveni književni povjesničar u nas, ali i stručno osporavan s neknjiževnih pozicija, kao pristran književni stručnjak, čije se ocjene temelje na zagovoru jugoslavenskoga kulturnoga jedinstva. Nastojali smo prenijeti bitne teze koje je sam Vodnik oblikovao kao nosiv dio svoje metode, dio njih i naoko usputno u radovima prigodnoga i polemičkoga značaja, s ciljem nepristrana i vremenski distancirana pogleda na metodološki proturječan, ali izvoran književnopovijesni opus koji je u čitanja hrvatskih pisaca i razumijevanje njihovih duhovnih biografija unio nov, sintetski i genološko-kulturološki pristup, koji je, nedovoljno priznat za Vodnikova života i razumijevan kao znak njegove kritičke ekscentričnosti i metodološke kolebljivosti, puni zamah dobio u radovima suvremenih književnih povjesničara novije književnosti, koji u književnopovijesne sinteze uvrštavaju kulturološke uvide. Vodnik je stoga među pretečama i moderne enciklopedijske književne biografije i kulturološkoga zaokreta u hrvatskoj književnoj povijesti.
In this paper, we try to shed light on the biographical component in Branko Vodnikʼs oeuvre, with an emphasis on metabiographical and methodological manifestations in his literary-historical and critical articles and in the articles in the Serbian-Croatian-Slovenian National Encyclopedia. In order to have a more complete insight into Vodnikʼs lexicographic work, the lexicographic material in Vodnikʼs manuscript legacy was consulted and described. The aim of the paper is threefold: to shed light on Vodnikʼs lesser-known observations on the method of literary history work, to connect his theses in his studies with the interpretations he presented in his encyclopedia articles, and to describe the controversies in literary history that were directly manifested in Vodnikʼs work and in his professional career. As a prominent literary historian of Croatian modernity, recognised as a methodological innovator and reformer, he was incorrectly presented as the first Croatian literary historian to apply a scientific method, but also criticised from non-literary standpoints, as a literary expert whose evaluations were based on the advocacy of Yugoslav cultural unity. We attempt to convey the essential theses that Vodnik himself formed as a supporting part of his method, some of them seemingly incidentally in works of occasional and polemical importance, with the aim of presenting an unbiased and temporally distanced view of the methodologically contradictory but original literary-historical oeuvre that introduced a new, synthetic, and genological-cultural approach into the readings of Croatian writers and understanding of their biographies, which, insufficiently recognised during Vodnikʼs lifetime and understood as a sign of his critical eccentricity and methodological vacillation, gained full momentum in the works of contemporary literary historians of recent literature, who include cultural insights in literary-historical syntheses. Vodnik thus belongs to the forerunners of modern encyclopedic literary biography and a cultural turn in Croatian literary history.
The article considers a brief history of the introduction «GTO» complex in 1930-1940 among employees of water transport. Water athletes not only passed the standards of the «GTO», but also held ...industry competitions, took an active part in the sports life of the country. In 1938, the «Vodnik» voluntary sports society United the water athletes. At the second all-around championship of the USSR «GTO» 2nd stage DSO «Vodnik» took third place. At the parade dedicated to the all Union day of physical culture in 1940 years 300 athletes of DSO «Vodnik» took part, among them were the Champions of the USSR.
Kmetijske in rokodelske novice so izhajale tedensko, urejal jih je Janez Bleiweis. Namenjene so bile najprej v pomoč kmetom in obrtnikom, kasneje pa so objavljale prispevke s področja leposlovja, ...konservativne politike, kulture in dopisov iz raznih krajev. Pomembne so bile predvsem zaradi utrjevanja slovenskega knjižnega jezika, splošnega sprejema gajice in nasploh zaradi vsestranskega kulturnega razvoja slovenskega naroda. Časnik se nadaljuje pod naslovom Novice kmetijskih, rokodelnih in narodskih reči
