Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Importance of nonpulmonary ...
    Hayashi, Kentaro; An, Yoshimori; Nagashima, Michio; Hiroshima, Kenichi; Ohe, Masatsugu; Makihara, Yu; Yamashita, Kennosuke; Yamazato, Schoichiro; Fukunaga, Masato; Sonoda, Koichiro; Ando, Kenji; Goya, Masahiko

    Heart rhythm, 09/2015, Volume: 12, Issue: 9
    Journal Article

    Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is an established treatment strategy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, the recurrence rate of PAF is 8% to 37%, despite repeated procedures, and the catheter ablation strategy for PAF with non-PV foci is unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the PAF ablation strategy for non-PV foci. The study included 304 consecutive patients undergoing PAF ablation (209 males, age 63.0 ± 10.4 years) divided into 3 groups: group 1 (245 patients) with no inducible non-PV foci; group 2 (34 patients) with atrial fibrillation (AF) originating from non-PV foci and all the foci successfully ablated; and group 3 (25 patients) with AF originating from non-PV triggers, but without all foci being ablated or with persistently inducible AF. Mean follow-up period was 26.9 ± 11.8 months, and AF recurrence rates since the last procedure were 9.8%, 8.8%, and 68.0% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between groups 1 and 2 (P = .89); however, there were statistically significant differences between groups 3 and 1 (P <.0001) and groups 3 and 2 (P <.0001). The patients in group 2 had an AF-free outcome to equivalent to those who had PV foci in group 1 (P = .83). Success rates can be improved for PAF ablation if non-PV foci are detected and eliminated.