Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • Corpora amylacea in benign ...
    Palangmonthip, Watchareepohn; Wu, Ruizhe; Tarima, Sergey; Bobholz, Samuel A.; LaViolette, Peter S.; Gallan, Alexander J.; Iczkowski, Kenneth A.

    The Prostate, 06/2020, Volume: 80, Issue: 9
    Journal Article

    Background Corpora amylacea (CAM), in benign prostatic acini, contain acute‐phase proteins. Do CAM coincide with carcinoma? Methods Within 270 biopsies, 83 prostatectomies, and 33 transurethral resections (TURs), CAM absence was designated CAM 0; corpora in less than 5% of benign acini: CAM 1; in 5% to 25%: CAM 2; in more than 25%: CAM 3. CAM were compared against carcinoma presence, clinicopathologic findings, and grade groups (GG) 1 to 2 vs 3 to 5. The frequency of CAM according to anatomic zone was counted. A pilot study was conducted using paired initial benign and repeat biopsies (33 benign, 24 carcinoma). Results A total of 68.9% of biopsies, 96.4% of prostatectomies, and 66.7% of TURs disclosed CAM. CAM ≥1 was common at an older age (P = .019). In biopsies, 204 cases (75%) had carcinoma; and CAM of 2 to 3 (compared to 0‐1) were recorded in 25.0% of carcinomas but only 7.4% of benign biopsies (P = .005; odds ratio OR = 5.1). CAM correlated with high percent Gleason pattern 3, low GG (P = .035), and chronic inflammation (CI). CI correlated inversely with carcinoma (P = .003). CAM disclosed no association with race, body mass index, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), acute inflammation (in biopsies), atrophy, or carcinoma volume. With CAM 1, the odds of GG 3 to 5 carcinoma, by comparison to CAM 0, decreased more than 2× (OR = 0.48; P = .032), with CAM 2, more than 3× (OR = 0.33; P = .005), and with CAM 3, almost 3× (OR = 0.39, P = .086). For men aged less than 65, carcinoma predictive model was: Score = (2 × age) + (5 × PSA) − (20 × degree of CAM); using our data, area under the ROC curve was 78.17%. When the transition zone was involved by cancer, it showed more CAM than in cases where it was uninvolved (P = .012); otherwise zonal distributions were similar. In the pilot study, CAM ≥1 predicted carcinoma on repeat biopsy (P < .05; OR = 8), as did CAM 2 to 3 (P < .0001; OR = 30). CI was not significant, and CAM retained significance after adjusting for CI. Conclusion CAM correlate with carcinoma. Whether abundant CAM in benign biopsies adds value amidst high clinical suspicion, warrants further study.