Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • Ipilimumab alone or in comb...
    Zimmer, Lisa; Apuri, Susmitha; Eroglu, Zeynep; Kottschade, Lisa A; Forschner, Andrea; Gutzmer, Ralf; Schlaak, Max; Heinzerling, Lucie; Krackhardt, Angela M; Loquai, Carmen; Markovic, Svetomir N; Joseph, Richard W; Markey, Kelly; Utikal, Jochen S; Weishaupt, Carsten; Goldinger, Simone M; Sondak, Vernon K; Zager, Jonathan S; Schadendorf, Dirk; Khushalani, Nikhil I

    European journal of cancer (1990), 04/2017, Volume: 75
    Journal Article

    Abstract Background The anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors pembrolizumab and nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab have shown improved objective response rates and progression-free survival compared to ipilimumab only in advanced melanoma patients. Anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated nearly equal clinical efficacy in patients who had progressed after ipilimumab or were treatment-naïve. However, only limited evidence exists regarding the efficacy of ipilimumab alone or in combination with nivolumab after treatment failure to anti-PD-therapy. Patients and methods A multicenter retrospective study in advanced melanoma patients who were treated with nivolumab (1 or 3 mg/kg) and ipilimumab (1 mg or 3 mg/kg) or ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) alone after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy was performed. Patient, tumour, pre- and post-treatment characteristics were analysed. Results In total, 47 patients were treated with ipilimumab (ipi-group) and 37 patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab (combination-group) after treatment failure to anti-PD-1 therapy. Overall response rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 16% and 21%, respectively. Disease control rate was 42% for the ipi-group and 33% for the combination-group. One-year overall survival rates for the ipi- and the combination-group were 54% and 55%, respectively. Conclusions Ipilimumab should be considered as a viable treatment option for patients with failure to prior anti-PD-1 therapy, including those with progressive disease as best response to prior anti-PD-1. In contrast, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab appears significantly less effective in this setting compared to treatment-naïve patients.