E-resources
Peer reviewed
Open access
-
DeRose, J.; Becker, M. R.; Rykoff, E. S.; Pandey, S.; MacCrann, N.; Amon, A.; Myles, J.; Krause, E.; Gruen, D.; Troxel, M. A.; Prat, J.; Alarcon, A.; Sánchez, C.; Blazek, J.; Crocce, M.; Giannini, G.; Gatti, M.; Bernstein, G. M.; Zuntz, J.; Dodelson, S.; Friedrich, O.; Secco, L. F.; Elvin-Poole, J.; Porredon, A.; Everett, S.; Choi, A.; Harrison, I.; Rodriguez-Monroy, M.; McCullough, J.; Cawthon, R.; Alves, O.; Andrade-Oliveira, F.; Bechtol, K.; Camacho, H.; Campos, A.; Rosell, A. Carnero; Kind, M. Carrasco; Diehl, H. T.; Drlica-Wagner, A.; Eckert, K.; Eifler, T. F.; Gruendl, R. A.; Hartley, W. G.; Huang, H.; Kuropatkin, N.; Raveri, M.; Rosenfeld, R.; Ross, A. J.; Sanchez, J.; Sheldon, E.; Yanny, B.; Yin, B.; Fosalba, P.; Aguena, M.; Allam, S.; Avila, S.; Bacon, D.; Bhargava, S.; Buckley-Geer, E.; Burke, D. L.; Carretero, J.; Castander, F. J.; Chang, C.; da Costa, L. N.; Pereira, M. E. S.; De Vicente, J.; Dietrich, J. P.; Doel, P.; Evrard, A. E.; Ferrero, I.; Ferté, A.; Flaugher, B.; García-Bellido, J.; Gaztanaga, E.; Giannantonio, T.; Gschwend, J.; Hinton, S. R.; Hollowood, D. L.; Huterer, D.; Kuehn, K.; Lahav, O.; Maia, M. A. G.; Marshall, J. L.; Menanteau, F.; Miquel, R.; Mohr, J. J.; Morgan, R.; Palmese, A.; Paz-Chinchón, F.; Petravick, D.; Pieres, A.; Malagón, A. A. Plazas; Sanchez, E.; Scarpine, V.; Serrano, S.; Smith, M.; Soares-Santos, M.; Suchyta, E.; Tarle, G.; Varga, T. N.
Physical review. D, 06/2022, Volume: 105, Issue: 12Journal Article
We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) 3×2-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak-lensing analyses. We show that the buzzard2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak-lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the 3×2-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the nonlinear matter power spectrum, nonlinear galaxy bias, and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy–galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
Author
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.