E-resources
-
Abbott, T M C; Abdalla, F B; Annis, J; Bechtol, K; Blazek, J; Benson, B A; Bernstein, R A; Bernstein, G M; Bertin, E; Brooks, D; Burke, D L; Carnero Rosell, A; Carrasco Kind, M; Carretero, J; Castander, F J; Chang, C L; Crawford, T M; Cunha, C E; D’Andrea, C B; da Costa, L N; Davis, C; DeRose, J; Desai, S; Diehl, H T; Dietrich, J P; Doel, P; Drlica-Wagner, A; Evrard, A E; Fernandez, E; Flaugher, B; Fosalba, P; Frieman, J; García-Bellido, J; Gaztanaga, E; Gerdes, D W; Giannantonio, T; Gruen, D; Gruendl, R A; Gschwend, J; Gutierrez, G; Hartley, W G; Henning, J W; Honscheid, K; Hoyle, B; Huterer, D; Jain, B; James, D J; Jarvis, M; Jeltema, T; Johnson, M D; Johnson, M W G; Krause, E; Kuehn, K; Kuhlmann, S; Kuropatkin, N; Lahav, O; Liddle, A R; Lima, M; Lin, H; MacCrann, N; Maia, M A G; Manzotti, A; March, M; Marshall, J L; Miquel, R; Mohr, J J; Natoli, T; Nugent, P; Ogando, R L C; Park, Y; Plazas, A A; Reichardt, C L; Reil, K; Roodman, A; Ross, A J; Rozo, E; Rykoff, E S; Sanchez, E; Scarpine, V; Schubnell, M; Scolnic, D; Sevilla-Noarbe, I; Sheldon, E; Smith, M; Smith, R C; Soares-Santos, M; Sobreira, F; Suchyta, E; Tarle, G; Thomas, D; Troxel, M A; Walker, A R; Wechsler, R H; Weller, J; Wester, W; Wu, W L K; Zuntz, J
Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 11/2018, Volume: 480, Issue: 3Journal Article
We combine Dark Energy Survey Year 1 clustering and weak lensing data with baryon acoustic oscillations and Big Bang nucleosynthesis experiments to constrain the Hubble constant. Assuming a flat ΛCDM model with minimal neutrino mass (∑m_ν = 0.06 eV), we find |$H_0=67.4^{+1.1}_{-1.2}\ \rm {km\,\rm s^{-1}\,\rm Mpc^{-1}}$| (68 per cent CL). This result is completely independent of Hubble constant measurements based on the distance ladder, cosmic microwave background anisotropies (both temperature and polarization), and strong lensing constraints. There are now five data sets that: (a) have no shared observational systematics; and (b) each constrains the Hubble constant with fractional uncertainty at the few-per cent level. We compare these five independent estimates, and find that, as a set, the differences between them are significant at the 2.5σ level (χ^2/dof = 24/11, probability to exceed = 1.1 per cent). Having set the threshold for consistency at 3σ, we combine all five data sets to arrive at |$H_0=69.3^{+0.4}_{-0.6}\ \rm {km\,\mathrm{ s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{ Mpc}^{-1}}$|.
Author
Shelf entry
Permalink
- URL:
Impact factor
Access to the JCR database is permitted only to users from Slovenia. Your current IP address is not on the list of IP addresses with access permission, and authentication with the relevant AAI accout is required.
Year | Impact factor | Edition | Category | Classification | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Select the library membership card:
If the library membership card is not in the list,
add a new one.
DRS, in which the journal is indexed
Database name | Field | Year |
---|
Links to authors' personal bibliographies | Links to information on researchers in the SICRIS system |
---|
Source: Personal bibliographies
and: SICRIS
The material is available in full text. If you wish to order the material anyway, click the Continue button.