Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-resources
Peer reviewed Open access
  • Discovery of biomarkers for...
    Koivula, Robert W.; Forgie, Ian M.; Kurbasic, Azra; Viñuela, Ana; Heggie, Alison; Giordano, Giuseppe N.; Hansen, Tue H.; Hudson, Michelle; Koopman, Anitra D. M.; Rutters, Femke; Siloaho, Maritta; Allin, Kristine H.; Brage, Søren; Brorsson, Caroline A.; Dawed, Adem Y.; De Masi, Federico; Groves, Christopher J.; Kokkola, Tarja; Mahajan, Anubha; Perry, Mandy H.; Rauh, Simone P.; Ridderstråle, Martin; Teare, Harriet J. A.; Thomas, E. Louise; Tura, Andrea; Vestergaard, Henrik; White, Tom; Adamski, Jerzy; Bell, Jimmy D.; Beulens, Joline W.; Brunak, Søren; Dermitzakis, Emmanouil T.; Froguel, Philippe; Frost, Gary; Gupta, Ramneek; Hansen, Torben; Hattersley, Andrew; Jablonka, Bernd; Kaye, Jane; Laakso, Markku; McDonald, Timothy J.; Pedersen, Oluf; Schwenk, Jochen M.; Pavo, Imre; Mari, Andrea; McCarthy, Mark I.; Ruetten, Hartmut; Walker, Mark; Pearson, Ewan; Franks, Paul W.

    Diabetologia, 09/2019, Volume: 62, Issue: 9
    Journal Article

    Aims/hypothesis Here, we describe the characteristics of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification (DIRECT) epidemiological cohorts at baseline and follow-up examinations (18, 36 and 48 months of follow-up). Methods From a sampling frame of 24,682 adults of European ancestry enrolled in population-based cohorts across Europe, participants at varying risk of glycaemic deterioration were identified using a risk prediction algorithm (based on age, BMI, waist circumference, use of antihypertensive medication, smoking status and parental history of type 2 diabetes) and enrolled into a prospective cohort study ( n  = 2127) (cohort 1, prediabetes risk). We also recruited people from clinical registries with type 2 diabetes diagnosed 6–24 months previously ( n  = 789) into a second cohort study (cohort 2, diabetes). Follow-up examinations took place at ~18 months (both cohorts) and at ~48 months (cohort 1) or ~36 months (cohort 2) after baseline examinations. The cohorts were studied in parallel using matched protocols across seven clinical centres in northern Europe. Results Using ADA 2011 glycaemic categories, 33% ( n  = 693) of cohort 1 (prediabetes risk) had normal glucose regulation and 67% ( n  = 1419) had impaired glucose regulation. Seventy-six per cent of participants in cohort 1 was male. Cohort 1 participants had the following characteristics (mean ± SD) at baseline: age 62 (6.2) years; BMI 27.9 (4.0) kg/m 2 ; fasting glucose 5.7 (0.6) mmol/l; 2 h glucose 5.9 (1.6) mmol/l. At the final follow-up examination the participants’ clinical characteristics were as follows: fasting glucose 6.0 (0.6) mmol/l; 2 h OGTT glucose 6.5 (2.0) mmol/l. In cohort 2 (diabetes), 66% ( n  = 517) were treated by lifestyle modification and 34% ( n  = 272) were treated with metformin plus lifestyle modification at enrolment. Fifty-eight per cent of participants in cohort 2 was male. Cohort 2 participants had the following characteristics at baseline: age 62 (8.1) years; BMI 30.5 (5.0) kg/m 2 ; fasting glucose 7.2 (1.4) mmol/l; 2 h glucose 8.6 (2.8) mmol/l. At the final follow-up examination, the participants’ clinical characteristics were as follows: fasting glucose 7.9 (2.0) mmol/l; 2 h mixed-meal tolerance test glucose 9.9 (3.4) mmol/l. Conclusions/interpretation The IMI DIRECT cohorts are intensely characterised, with a wide-variety of metabolically relevant measures assessed prospectively. We anticipate that the cohorts, made available through managed access, will provide a powerful resource for biomarker discovery, multivariate aetiological analyses and reclassification of patients for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes.