Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-resources
Full text
Peer reviewed
  • The geographies of communit...
    Cutter, Susan L.; Ash, Kevin D.; Emrich, Christopher T.

    Global environmental change, 11/2014, Volume: 29
    Journal Article

    •Inherent resilience and its drivers are spatially variable.•The Midwest and Northeast have higher levels of inherent resilience than elsewhere in the US.•Lowest levels of resilience are in Texas border counties, Appalachia, and the interior western US.•Resilience and vulnerability are statistically related, but not the obverse of one another. There is increasing policy and research interest in disaster resilience, yet the extant literature is still mired in definitional debates, epistemological orientations of researchers, and differences in basic approaches to measurement. As a consequence, there is little integration across domains and disciplines on community resilience assessment, its driving forces, and geographic variability. Using US counties as the study unit, this paper creates an empirically-based resilience metric called the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) that is both conceptually and theoretically sound, yet, easy enough to compute for use in a policy context. A common set of variables were used to measure the inherent resilience of counties in the United States according to six different domains or capitals as identified in the extant literature – social, economic, housing and infrastructure, institutional, community, and environmental. Data were from public and freely accessible data sources. Counties in the US Midwest and Great Plains states have the most inherent resilience, while counties in the west, along the US-Mexico border, and along the Appalachian ridge in the east contain the least resilience. Further, it was found that inherent resilience is not the opposite of social vulnerability, but a distinctly different construct both conceptually and empirically. While understanding the overall variability in resilience, the BRIC is easily deconstructed to its component parts to provide guidance to policy makers on where investments in intervention strategies may make a difference in the improvement of scores. Such evidence-based research has an opportunity to influence public policy focused on disaster risk.